All Activity

So...what did that article say and what was the point of contention as YOU see it...given I'm sure you're not just going off a headline, right?

Yeah, I never said Harris, Hakm or AOC. Newsom would hardly be "laughable," but not my choice. And if you want to know what someone stands for, go look it up. But calling an Astronaut and literal Fighter Pilot a "loon," is a little silly. He's also one of the most bi-partisan Senators based on his voting history. But sure, "Loon." (Have you seen the cabinet or the guy who sits behind the resolute desk)? You want to know what Polis stands for, go listen to some speeches. JB Pritzker...again, too far, but he looses 40 pounds, he'd be a great candidate.

Of course that's their aim, I said when we pulled out of the JCPOA, there was no reason for THEM to hold up their end of the bargain. -I'm pointing out that SAME organization that... you're now taking as gospel, said they were Complient in 2018 and UNTIL Trump pulled out(which was particularly stupid as he's not telling Israel to stand down while he negotiates). -60% doesn't get you a Nuclear Weapon and AGAIN, the SAME organization, has said; So yeah, I don't believe they're a week away or we'd have bombed them by now. Some of you use the same source in one context, ignore it in another. -They're more definitely working TOWARD building a bomb.

LOL...so to recap, YOU made the claim that Iran was NOT living up to the agreement; So you just effectively said 'nuh-uh!' LOL...I simply pointed out what the DIRECTOR of National Intelligence said and HOW LONG Israel has been making the "one week away" claims. I've also REPEATEDLY said that Iran is OBVIOUSLY now enriching uranium. Of course they are. Why would they NOT? A Nuclear Weapon is a strong deterrent. What's more, I NEVER argued against bombing Iran(just the opposite). See.... reading is important Jimmy. I've advocated the US AIDING in regime change, I've never made it a secret which side I supported. Israel. ALWAYS been Israel. But this is where you're simply...not...capable of a coherent discussion. You contradict yourself regularly. You ALSO said; So.... any chance you can answer my question? -In 2018, it was a fake agreement, Iran did as they pleased despite the IAEA saying they were in accordance. -2025 'Here's PROOF they're enriching Uranium!' I know there's lots of words here and that's my fault. I'll probably get 4-5 replies in which you never actually answer MY question.

Mark Kelly is just not national enough, plus he is a loon. He has not shown leadership on anything to date on a big scale. Polis might be good but no name recognition. Who is he? Point taken about Trump's successor. JD is the most likely and seems to work in the similar way. I think most Rs would be on board. Harris, Newsom, Hakim, AOC? Laughable. mspart

https://nypost.com/2025/06/19/us-news/democrats-main-fundraising-committee-so-cash-strapped-its-considering-borrowing-money-really-f-ked/

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/3447050/dnc-cash-shrinks-leadership-fallout-continues/

Ahh ... thought you were suggesting going to watch it.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/18/us/politics/dnc-ken-martin.html

LOL...ooh...the "Geller report!" That's... definitely a non-biased platform! And the truth; Why use actual sources with any credibility when you have a wacko and a Newsletter!

I already did this; I'd also add Jared Polis of Colorado would be an excellent candidate... if you just look at his political ideology, but he's gay, so his chances are non-existent. I'm...incredibly skeptical of anyone picking up from Trump in the "MAGA," party.

You tube has some really good videos with the MOP (GBU-57) in action. There are a good number of videos. How a Bunker Buster Bomb works. The video Is really good.

go ahead, tell us how you can use it from 2018, but discount it now

Classic victim blaming

We see the problem through the lens of adults with life experience. The victims at Ohio State were 23 and younger and working within a lopsided power dynamic.

FLO if it matters enough...

Tell us everything you know about Sentes and everything you think Sentes isn't...

I answered this question: “Please tell me this is coherent to someone else?” I made no comment as to what I agreed or disagreed with. I would have thought that someone with your scholarly intellect would have caught that, right off.

I sure hope the "knowledgeable" dudes show up soon and tell how to process this in a tier one way...

So you don’t believe what you say? Good to know

I’m just starting to follow and learn more about international freestyle. Is there a good way to follow trials from other countries too? I’d like to learn more about the guys that are top competition for the US team at worlds, but have no idea where to look for that info or updates.

Take your own advice. When it says they are not building a bomb, it means exactly that and nothing more. They may have all the components on the bench in front of them, but as long as they’re not assembling them, they’re not building one. Even at that, it’s still just informed speculation. Recognizing all the missed calls of the intelligence community. There is no civilian or industrial application for uranium enriched above 40%. Iran’s cheating on the JCPOA was known to be just as prolific as in the Oil for Food Program. Anything above 40% is building towards a bomb. To anyone with common sense.

We all agree Iran does not need nuclear weapons right? funny. I’ll have to find the vid. A newscaster on msnbc (this week) said he traveled to Iran and witnessed a ralley where they kept yelling death to America. He tried to spin it that it doesn’t mean that and they are nice and like our American movies lol. True story.

did they have 60% at that time. I dont think so .

Ok...so you "understand" what he's saying, but don't agree with it? You can just go ahead and clarify then. This is what Scout had to say; You understood he was talking about @1032004when he said there was "definitely a troll who SAID he voted for Trump but it's clear he is a leftist And then with regard to Senator Mike Lee, you UNDERSTAND that he was rationalizing Mike Lee's statements as "Playing word games," but don't agree with that? I'd love if you could explain how him saying "this is what happens when Marxists don't get there way," and posting a picture of the man who assassinated a Democrat, his wife and then shot another Democrat and HIS wife 10 times each? My apologies, I just don't follow how that's a "word game," or a game at all, but I'll let you speak for yourself on your "understanding" of Scouts post in this context...if you don't mind.