All Activity

A little is essential. Our military spending is about half of the entire world. I'd gut it like a fat pig.

Military is one of the few legitimate functions of government.

Sounds good until someone is doing your job for less driving down your standard of living. Huge amounts of money leave the country and never benefit America.

Okay….well, you brought up the bail. (As was shown where I quoted you). I guess since the data doesn’t agree with what your politicians want you to believe (I know I know, they’re all trash), you’re ready for one of your shifts. Carry on.

Find me one human that doesn’t want the Epstein files released on this board. I’ll save you some time. You won’t.

It is working. Talk about this instead of the Epstein Files.

Ya they win the Nobel prize for great planning for that one. Ha

Oh they are already prepared for the transition, wouldn't you be with someone that old as president...? I know it was a concern when Biden was president which I agree wholeheartedly with. Any time you have someone this old with several comorbidities demonstrating symptoms of advanced aging and decay both physically and mentally you have to be ready for them to go at any second. Especiallllly with congenital heart failure.

Why would you not charge Gang bangers for killing each other. I don’t care about bail for the purposes of that topic

Ummmm.....that's exactly my point. A decision to not prosecute has nothing to do with a system on how to determine pre-trial release. And I was specifically addressing your claim on how they determine pre-trial release. As I see your reading comprehension is suffering again, allow me to copy your quote: "Now do Chicago and the other cities that have this. Having no bail for some of these crimes is stupid" The point is that whether or not the defendant can come up with the money for bail has no impact on whether or not they will commit the crime. What the data shows is that with determining pre-trial release based on risk factors, rather than can they come up with money, is having an impact on whether or not those defendants are out of jail to commit another crime...or...not show up to court. The system does not mean everyone is automatically released, it means their release is not simply determined by whether or not they have the money. To put it into simpler terms.....gang bangers have cash. Drug dealers have cash. Determining their release based on risk factors other than cash.....since these violent criminals have the cash...has no impact on crime going up, which is what the talking heads want you to believe. The other benefit is that instead of $140 million dollars a year going to courts, it is going to the community retail store and restaurants, etc etc, all while not influencing an increase in crime.

she should go on cnn then. The world needs to know. Should jd Vance prepare for immediate promotion to president ?

Fortunately we live in a world where multiple things can be true at once...

What does not prosecuting gang bangers shooting each other because they are “non combatants” have to do with pre release. They elected not to charge because gang banger A only shot at gang banger B. If they’re not charging that. How can their stats have any credibility.

Yah, there's typically a period of poor and rapidly declining health shortly before death.

I've seen plenty of 80 year olds walking around with bruised hands &/or arms ... still alive.

Literally says not a ban. What does not a ban mean to you?

I’m sure she’s an expert. I’m sure you have 0 bias too.

Forewarning it is extremely dry satirical delivery of the content but wild listening and seeing how at the end of the doc it connects to current events/power/control etc... Much of it is about the Comedy scene and Joe Rogan rising to be the comedy Czar. For those thinking this is a liberal documentary, it is not and I've never even heard of this guy (that made the documentary)until today. Instead of focusing on a political side it becomes more about the tech billionaires as power brokers and how they want to implement their world view. If you're patient enough to hang in until the end it's a pretty interesting listen/watch...

You're too stupid to continue with.

Where in the article does it say it's unconstitutional?

It actually is very relevant given her decades spent treating congenital heart failure in 1,000s of patients so common sense would help you arrive at the possibility she and others who have treated it know what it looks like... As for her being on the news, I can't answer that but it certainly never stopped you from giving your opinions on subject matter you have far less knowledge of...

If I put it on YouTube, @JimmySpeaks and other wingers definitely will. I don't need data if it meets their narrative. If not, then any data must be fake anyway.

Well, i guess first you have to understand the system has nothing to do with "not to prosecute", it solely has to do with how they now determine whether or not a defendant is released pre-trial. And, again, I asked what it says that the data is the data. If you don't want to face the data, that's okay. I'm not going to go through all your hoops with you this evening.

Do you actually expect anyone here to believe you have ever had one of these parties, and that you are not just talking BS out your a**?

Hadyn Danals from Virginia to Gardner-Webb Ostin Blanchard from Bellarmine to North Dakota State