Jump to content

Husker_Du

President
  • Posts

    2,604
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    26

Everything posted by Husker_Du

  1. i have read that they were fired b/c they didn't need that many coders and engineers. are you saying that is not accurate? and then are you saying there is something in the reason for their firing that makes the current situation poetic?
  2. "You have to keep reading." WHERE?! you've posted nothing of substance! when pressed, went full ad hominem. you post that recipe right now, you prick
  3. Rasta, i'm not 'projecting emotions'. i'm asking you questions based on your previous posts. to which you keep replying with things about my height and emotions lol. if you could post something in response with thought and substance that would be great. if not, please post your grilled wing recipe and we'll call it even.
  4. There it is: my point is that people were using teh initial number as a prop up for how much better Tucker was going to do on Twitter vs. Fox News that is a good point and valid thesis i would have said nothing if you opened with that. (not that i believe it to be a foregone conclusion). although this "Tucker's success was a product of Fox News, not of anything special about Tucker" doesn't necessarily have to be true also.
  5. fair point. sorry. let me ask this: you don't watch Tucker, but you know he's a giant p.o.s.. how? based on what?
  6. so no one watches any news around here and everyone is an expert. weird.
  7. idk what you mean. i'm completely fine lol. anyway, so what's your point about those numbers? it can't be that Tucker is bad. he blows everyone else out of the water. so what is the point? RE: MSM - so you watch none of it, and you watch no national shows. but you're an armchair QB on all things national news shows. got it
  8. why do you guys so clearly and obviously want Elon to fail? c'mon, say it. say it out loud. sheep
  9. lol. where am i trying to be intimidating? sounds like you're reading a bit in to something that's not there. but lemme get this straight, you don't watch any national news shows but tucker is the worst. does that sum it up? also Steve Harvey sucks.
  10. yeah, this is full of shit. who else has done those numbers? who else in news is as followed? if he was a MSM type you'd be singing his praises. objectively....objectively...no one comes close to those numbers. so try again
  11. 1) why? 2) thats not Vak's point. it is clearly that Tucker's numbers aren't great and getting worse 3) who has better numbers 4) this is where you say Tucker only has good numbers b/c this country is inherently racist and everyone who listens to him is racist and racist. racist. racist. racism.
  12. and watch regularly? who's shows/segments do you like best. put it on record cause i'm tired of you whining like snowflakes. i got @VakAttack down for Sunni Hostin & The View i'll put @WrestlingRasta down for Rachel Maddow and Myron Mixon who else?
  13. lmfao. i knew exactly what was going to be in this thread before i opened it. you guys are dorks. what exactly is your thesis here? that Tucker • doesn't matter? • is overrated? • is a waning star? c'mon, spell it out. so that it can be easily refuted. meanwhile...you're watching MSM like lapdogs. dorks.
  14. the delay is in how to spin it, i'd imagine. or who to take the fall for it.
  15. you can't be fucking serious. there's zero difference. the result is the same. he didn't fire them b/c of ability. he fired them b/c they weren't needed. your position makes no sense. there was no 'karma' here
  16. they weren't needed. they were superfluous and twitter hemorrhaged money. whether or not a competing product leads to 'his demise' their employment there was unnecessary. when amazon (ie - any large company) lays off people, would you say the same thing?
  17. i'm so incredibly jealous of this
  18. after 37 pages can i get an update from you hippy effers? what's so bad about Elon's era of twitter? you guys getting picked on?
  19. yeah, i understand that. but the pearl clutching by the right is just a political stance. absolutely no one was in danger bc a little coke was in a cubby. there's more than enough real stuff to address then that
  20. 1) there's no way they can't find out whose it is. it was a 'highly traveled area' and in a cubby. there are cameras everywhere. 2) who gives a fuck? it's a recreational drug. this is partisan stuff. like 'oh, the audacity'.
  21. this is fuggin incredible
  22. i feel like Austin O'Connor would be a tough out (P4P-wise)
  23. my braised short ribs came out awesome. idk if they were supposed to, but they came out kinda resembling like an indian curry dish (w/o the curry flavor)
×
×
  • Create New...