El Luchador

John Deere is in the middle of a lawsuit on this right now.

You are absolutely wrong, 1 is no more provable than the other. My issue is so much is taught as fact and that no reasonable person would disagree. You're doing it here. There is a lot of scientific debate within the theory of evolution and that information is withheld because they want people to think a certain way. That is not education.

No that's the Nancy Pelosi method, I'm saying wait to hear the debate and see if it amends into something of substance. Reading the bill I would agree, but it's just a rough draft. Clearly the bill doesn't have enough detail to do anything with.

So what's significant about not factoring in depreciation?

https://youtu.be/sSwV7li-duQ

EASTERN Oregon wants to leave the madness of Ultra Liberal Oregon and get annexed by Idaho. Wouldn't this be a great solution for people who can't see eye to eye.

It's intellectual dishonesty and you're doubling down on it

Nice job with the deflection But that was never part of the discussion. The point is the media again tried to mis represent trump. Biden allowed that thing to go all the way across the country and chose to do nothing about it. They tried to make it sound like Trump did the same that was a lie.

You guys are making broad assumptions about a bill that hasn't been passed or debated. You are simply applying your bias which ironically what has so many people upset with their schools. There is no way the way you are portraying this is accurate as to how it will be implemented. But it allows you to paint yourself and other leftist as the intellectual ones and you opposition as stupid.

Not what the left tried to sell us on. Those were lies.

Still not the point they were trying to make us believe. 2 facts: #1: Trump was never made aware of it #2: the left tried to sell the lie Trump knew and did nothing

https://youtu.be/RIiX-z07G04

Did he willing and knowingly allow it? No. Did the left try to make it look that way? Yes. Did they lie? Yes

This is just stupid and weak. The Leftists tried to make up a story to legitimize Brain dead Brandon's ineptitude and they got caught in a lie.

You can't be serious.

Yes but when they colluded with the government then the government was breaking the law, also they have an obligation to provide equal and consistent applications of it policies. There is an agreement that they need to hold up their end of.

No the narrative of the left was Trump allow this, and that is very much untrue.

Are you saying Twitter no long functions properly?

Not allowing your products to be used for killing people makes him a shitbag?

Removing Ivy league doctors because they propose different takes than the government narrative should scare the hell out of any liberty loving American. When the man whose name is on the MRNA patent is removed for disinformation there is a real problem.

If you can't win the debate silence the opposition.

I absolutely do. I have a significant science background. I studied the physics of energy and industrial studies with an emphasis on industry and the environment. This was 35 years ago and I never worked in these fields, but I most certainly do understand theory vs fact. In almost every area of science there are logically competing theories. Even electron flow vs hole theory is not settled science. Gravity is only observable and has widely varied theories. Even the age of the universe is widely disputed but is taught as fact. Zero point energy is often dismissed simply because it take away credibility from to many other theories. Science has become political and that shit needs to stop.

It doesn't help that our refs view everything from a folkstyle perspective.

I personally have no familiarity with Twitter, but I'm pretty sure that's a violation of policy. Not even close to trying to silence your opposition like we now know was common practice. Asking for entire content be removed from all users such as vaccine discussion was clearly Government censorship. Not the same as flagging content that violates policy.

I think this another case of Don't Say Gay. This bill isn't fully developed and people are making broad assumptions as to how it will be applied. It is important that kids are taught that theory is not fact and there should be some balance. Kids are clearly being taught that some science is fact when it is not. The famous "The science is settled " that people love to throw around. Making that statement is about as unscientific as you can be. This is more of a critical thinking issue.