Bigbrog

Tennessee has a wrestling program??

Glad you FINALLY got it after asking like 10 times....keep on keeping on Jimmy!

So why is Kerk ahead of Cass??

You want to deflect from what is actually the problem by playing semantics to fit your political narrative of all "R's" are bad and all "D's" are good b.s. Trump AND Biden should be held accountable for having top secret documents when they shouldn't have had them...period. Quite trying to make is sound like Trumps was SOOOO much worse...they both are bad!

Oh...so that makes it ok...

Oh boy...jajensen09 is probably sitting at his key board, staring at your post, and can't even type a response because he is shaking so bad from anger...watch out....

Appreciate the insight...but overall, insert any other president with what you wrote and it holds true. None of the last how many presidents had a clue what was in the best interest of Joe the Plumber, gave lip service to all the things spewed during campaigning, contributed to offshoring and tax breaks to corporate America (now some of those things do make sense when looked at from an overall perspective in terms of getting companies in places to have jobs available for people to work and earn a living. Can't criticize a company taking advantage of what is offered by our government, nor think the company owners are nothing but greedy in humane people when yet they are providing jobs, health care, etc. to a great number of people. Anyway, I digress, to actually answer your question and not give this huge overarching statements, I think Trump did a good job at looking at how we were spending our money and getting people to pay their fair share (ie., the UN, climate committee). His trade policy stance actually is fairly good considering how badly we were paying WAY more than we should have been. Some, not all, his reduction of completely stupid and zero benefit regulations that corporations and individuals had to pay for I liked. He did have a business head and made some good decisions in regards to our economy. Now HOW he went about some of these things was terrible and drove me to dislike him as a person, but that doesn't change how I felt about what he did. I honestly think all our presidential candidates are essentially all the same, and until we do something different we can't expect a different result as a society. I personally am more of a moderate who hates the D and/or R divide we have and who we have to vote for. Get rid of the biparty and just vote for people based on what their potential policies are.

Yikes...but hey at least you are honest and I can respect that.

It wasn't a decision about it "being a right"...that is the point. It was a decision about the ruling of Roe v Wade and who, based on the laws and constitution, has the right to make legislation about abortion.

So here is what gets my goat...when each side plays the extreme "what if" game, or use emotional fallacy statements by saying what could happen. The big 2nd amendment people do the same things (although I believe in the 2nd amendment and sensible background checks) as the Roe v Wade supporters do...say some extreme thing could happen because of a change in regard to a ruling. As for Roe v Wade ruling, I am just glad people have stopped using the emotional fallacy statement of "The SCOTUS banned abortions!", just as I'd like to see people stop using the emotional fallacy statement that the government is coming to take all your guns away used by the 2nd Amendment or die folks. This wasn't meant to derail the conversation but rather, come on people...stop with all the emotional fallacy statements to try and prove your point. To me abortion is a topic I don't think most of us are equipped to have, as it is EXTREMELY complicated. I agree with the SCOTUS that it should be left up to the State to make the legislation around it. I am against abortion, but at the same time don't believe it is my right to say what someone else does in their unique situation. I REALLY struggle with those who use it as a form of birth control but not sure how one can determine that based on each individual situation...so not my place to judge what is in that person's heart when they have to make that terrible decision. Just a tough thing and not sure anyone of us have the right answer and at the same time have the right answer.

So you don't know either...got it. Pretty sure Supreme Court Justices know more about the constitution than you.

I have actually found myself agreeing with a lot of what you wrote on this topic. I have a hard time when people just spew catchy headlines and blast politicians based on if they are a D or an R. If either side screws up they absolutely should be held accountable...equally. And wasn't sure if I wanted to address something you wrote about Trump's policies, or not his policies but don't want to go down that rabbit hole. I too despise the man, but probably for different reasons than you. Stay well.

Royalfan are you Pinto??

Its funny how people want Trump to be guilty of something just because he is a dips@!# and they don't like his policies (which my guess is if some of the people on here actual knew what some of his policies actually were they may in fact like them). I can attest to liking some of his policies but despise the man.

Sure hope your outrage, and maybe rightfully so, doesn't stop based on political party...I'll wait for you to list your glimpse of the future based on what some of the Dems have done....

So again, what law did he break? And you can't be mad at someone who follows the tax laws as written and thus, they don't have to pay as much tax as you hope they would. Trump is a lot of things but the amount he paid or didn't pay in taxes doesn't make him a criminal. Be mad at our politicians who made the laws and the IRS if you need to be mad at something. Be mad and hate Trump for, well, to many reasons really, but being mad about his taxes is baseless.

Wow...I actually agree with Mike on something.

Say all you want about McCarthy as I am not a fan, but it is absolutely laughable to say Schiff is a better person than anyone.

Surprised that there hasn't been any discussion about this (I'm not really surprised). Biden supporters (or I should say anyone with a D after their name supporters) where are you?? Can't wait to hear the hypocrisy from some of you on this... Where I stand on this issue...Biden should be held accountable for this as should Trump.

Dude...let it play out as it will take care of itself...relax...sheesh

Wait...Barry was a 3'xer. Here is a list of them Fanco Wrestling - Top 10 Best Iowa Hawkeye Wrestlers of All Time

Oh crap...I had it in my head Barry D. was a 3 timer

I made the mistake of thinking of Gable while writing what I wrote. I agree Lee may be in the conversation if he wins his fourth, but sure where some 3 timers that were hammers at Iowa in the past...even 2 timers. But Cael is definitely the GOAT at Penn St....as a COACH...LOL

Ban any move that may make the other wrestler uncomfortable. I am all for progressing the sport, but it scares me to think what wrestling may look like in the future if it goes the way some of your guy's hope for in regard to the rules and making certain moves illegal.

Back to the original topic, I think Lee is an elite college wrestler, and definitely should be in discussion as one of the best ever...but man...there sure were a lot of elite wrestlers that have come through Iowa, so it's hard to say unequivocally if he is the Iowa Hawkey's GOAT.