Jump to content

Offthemat

Members
  • Posts

    5,127
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    17

Everything posted by Offthemat

  1. With your anemic, inverted relationship with the truth, I hesitate to ask, but how sure are you that we don’t give money to Hamas?
  2. Why? https://www.politico.com/news/2023/03/21/illicit-cannabis-china-00086125
  3. Reports that on at least one of the western campuses the Hamas cheerleaders have been met by a group experienced with minority discrimination.
  4. That went…, well, let’s just say that the point is, it’s easy to be opinionated in the U.S. and Israel. It’s been relatively easy, until recently, to be Jewish, Zionist or not, in the U.S. and Israel. It’s not easy to be Jewish in any of those countries listed. In discussing the opinions of these twenty year olds on predominantly exclusive campuses, it needs to be noted that they only recently graduated from swallowing Tide pods.
  5. Where does one find anti-zionist Jews? Syria, Jordan, Saudi, Egypt, Iran, Iraq? Jews are just incompatible with sharia, right?
  6. This is not critical thinking. Puerile thinking, maybe, but not critical thinking. But at least now you and Rasta know you don’t have a Constitutional right to vote and won’t embarrass yourselves by claiming you do, anymore.
  7. The truck driver has recently retold his story and said any reports that he had retracted are fake news.
  8. Thanks for adding your face to my post. https://www.nytimes.com/article/voting-rights-constitution.html “But the Constitution contains no explicit right to vote.“
  9. Try: https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2024/04/who-are-these-people.php
  10. Simply, election interference. May be prosecuted as malicious prosecution.
  11. Constitutional. Constitutional Republic.
  12. There were no “fake electors.” There were alternate, or second sets of electors. They are not illegal, but in fact, necessary in contested elections. For a history of their use, study the 1876 and 1960 elections. In both cases second sets of electors were presented, and had they not been, the eventual winner would have forfeited his election.
  13. Voting is a privilege of citizenship, not to be endowed upon interlopers and stowaways, and deserves more consideration than a trip to the 7-11. Making it easier is unlikely to improve the quality. If you can’t get an id, and can’t put a little effort on one day every couple of years, voting is not important to you.
  14. Voting is not hard.
  15. According to a couple of scholars “it’s not the STEM” “it’s not the physics” majors and professors.
  16. Are you saying that a foreign visitor or someone here illegally who pays sales tax on a candy bar should be allowed to vote in our election? Different taxes have different purposes. Here, sales tax goes to pay for city, county, and state operations. Car tags go to schools. Gas goes to highways. Property taxes go to local governments, much of it to schools. Payroll taxes go to SS and medicare. Income taxes go to the state and federal government. If you don’t pay federal income tax, how can you claim the right to vote in elections for federal officers? Totally unnecessary. If voting isn’t important enough for you to make the effort to overcome your inconvenience, then it’s not important to you. There’s nothing wrong with that.
  17. We could, and we will, if we ever get serious about the security of our country.
  18. France uses paper ballots and knows the results by the next morning.
  19. It is not wise to use your SS number anywhere, someone might copy it.
  20. Those amendments do not give the right to vote to anyone, they merely give reasons for which the right to vote cannot be denied. You cannot find a sentence in the Constitution that says anyone has the right to vote.
  21. Wrong. There is no constitutional right to vote for anyone.
  22. Pause
×
×
  • Create New...