Offthemat

You need to understand that it’s a process. An element of the legislative branch is investigating elements of the executive branch and this is preliminary, as to the FBI’s participation in targeting political opponents. It’s actually about the fourth or fifth in the series, so far. The answers to these questions will be examined to determine the next steps to take, possible witnesses, subpoenas, etc. As for your concern about republicans being harsh to another republican, lots of people claim to be republicans in DC, like Comey. I think the tell in this hearing, as in most , is the amount of unresponsive answers.

That’s what she said.

That was three, maybe four years ago, right?

https://rumble.com/v2zhim8-tucker-carlson-ep.-9-the-andrew-tate-interview.html

I resemble this remark. I have a difficult time conveying my generous humor in my posts.

Addict? Sex or drugs?

Good catch.

Your voting record of late is anything but republican.

I find your presentation inconclusive at best, moreover lazy and incompetent. Any claim that requiring picture ID to be suppressive, egregious. 81 million votes, my ass.

Never been there.

You can’t fool me. By the way, can you get viagra in hell? It only happens for a short period during election years?

Not to mention vote democrat. Why do they always vote democrat after they die?

Naw, Hunter has diplomatic immunity.

The acorn doesn’t fall far from the tree. And yes, they all had their ambitions at times. But I think I’ll vote for the guy who’s ex-wives won’t even talk bad about him.

Haha, have you ever delved into the character traits of Joe, John F, Robert F, and Teddy Kennedy?

She’ll likely be asked again. What she said was unresponsive to the question she was asked, no matter how irresponsible she considers it to reframe the question she didn’t answer. The longer it takes to respond to the question the more people are convinced it was Hunter’s.

It is right.

I found it to be of no value.

They don’t communicate anything different at all. It’s the same person asking the same question in both cases and not getting an answer in either.

All the classified documents concerning his father’s and uncle’s deaths, and unnecessarily classified documents. The people have a right to know what our government is doing and has done on their dollar. How many parents did you surveille for attending school board meetings? How many federal agents were at the capitol on Jan. 6th and what was their task? What federal aid is being distributed to generate border crossings?

RFK has said the CIA was involved in his uncle’s death, that he would release all information now classified, that he would follow his uncle’s wish to “scatter the CIA to the wind.” Do you think he’d make it to the inauguration?

Kent you do better than that?

mspart said “she said that was an irresponsible question to ask.” She said “it’s irresponsible of you to ask that question.” What’s the difference?

I’m not speaking for Husker-Du, but what it brings to my mind are the reports that much of the arms shipped to Ukraine are being sold on the black market and the cash is being disbursed here and there, while Ukrainian oligarchs are showing up in Switzerland in their Rolls Royces to buy high end real estate.

I read this as Thomas’ opinion is that the other decisions may have been based on faulty reasoning or application of the law, not that they should necessarily be overturned. Just as Dobbs did not outlaw abortion, it left it to the states to determine how they would handle it.