Offthemat

Speaking of self awareness.

Isn’t that the same same complaint you’re complaining about?

Daisy Duke and Audra Barkley.

There is an effort, maybe even a case initiated, to rule the law he was found guilty of, unconstitutional. It does seem to have some merit.

You trick the shark into biting the battery and it electrocutes him. There’s an easy to follow video somewhere.

Man knows how to trigger the TDS afflicted. Does it repeatedly with success. Like taking candy from a baby. With the same results.

In Gaza, Hamas are salaried; civilians are piecework.

The hard evidence that our IC has interfered with the last two presidential elections is finally starting to sink in across the country.

What a maroon.

False. The court papers, while authentic, come from a legal filing dismissed in 2016. A subsequent lawsuit from the same anonymous claimant was dropped in 2016. The claimant has not been heard from since. Trump's lawyers at the time said the allegations made in the lawsuit were "categorically untrue." They have nothing to do with Wednesday's unsealed court documents, which mentions Trump but contains no allegations of wrongdoing. FACT CHECK BY Newsweek's Fact Check team https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/fact-check-do-papers-allege-trump-and-epstein-took-part-in-sexual-assault/ar-AA1mtiOa

81 million votes, my ass.

I can name a few countries where that occurs.

Another esteemed law professor can’t say what Trump was convicted of.

The FBI had the laptop from December 2019. After much time passed with no action the repair shop owner released copies he’d made. So through the whole affair Barr and Wray knew it was real and pertinent to the election, as well as incriminating, while withholding that information.

While it absolutely does if you’re trying to decide which one to consider to be correct. Another consideration might be to notice which ones have been consistently wrong, telling you Trump colluded with Russians, Hunter’s laptop was Russian disinformation, and Colorado could ban Trump from the ballot because Section 3 of the 14th Amendment is self executing. There’s at least one of those named in your ‘debunked’ link. I believe most of us here get our news from multiple sources that we’ve found reliable over time. We also hear the opposing views from various sources. We have our own varied opinions of right and wrong, but they’re similar for the most part. Of course, there’s a few that read like they’re fresh from the teacher’s union convention. As for transparency, I’m not trying to conceal anything, and I rarely post anything I can’t support. As for ending well, I’m pretty much out of conspiracy theories - they’ve all been proven true.

I’m going to take your word that you don’t know a lot about the trial. Understand that the grand jury and the trial jury were in the same boat. Both proceedings depend on the prosecutor and judge to impartially present the jurors with the information they need to make a judgment. The ‘debunk’ you linked fails on the first point. It debunks nothing, but instead depends on the reader to read the 13 pages that were required for the prosecutor to complete the circle. Similar to the true meaning of begging the question. It is not a matter of “charging in the alternative” as Vak claimed. Smith has a history of overturned verdicts and overcharging cases. Those also had grand juries and trial judges. So if you didn’t know what a show trial was before, now you have an example.

Given that the work that is attributed to our representatives is more the product of unelected staffers, bureaucrats, K Streeters, lobbyists, etc., I’m not sure the lure of money and celebrity will change that much, but it’s worth a shot.

Vote by mail?

You guys vote by mail, right?

I’ve noticed that.

A sign in my favorite pizza establishment says all politicians should be limited to two terms: one in office and one in the pen.

Twice on Sundays.