Offthemat
-
Posts
4,475 -
Joined
-
Days Won
15
Offthemat's Achievements
-
I’m sure some would go that route, maybe even duck the entire match.
-
The ref can call stalemate, but not award points unilaterally.
-
It will likely be the Penn State team.
-
Agreed. It’s also my position that the top man can’t stall unless the bottom wrestler is also stalling. My recommendation is that the penalty for stalling is a restart with choice of position to the non-offending wrestler, much like after an injury timeout.
-
Was there a problem with a lack of scoring in the first period that led to the initiation of the rule?
-
So it has been tried and rejected?
-
Quality of competition? Which one defeated an Olympic Gold Medalist?
-
You’re only speculating. We won’t know how it would affect scoring until or unless it’s tried. It would certainly put emphasis on being the first to get a takedown.
-
He was attempting to resolve the 0-0 first period issue. I thought it was a dandy tournament. And for all the concern about seeding, especially with 125 & 141, they seemed to have gotten it pretty close.
-
No, he said it.
-
I think they decided that this year they’re gonna go by this year’s rules.
-
Sportsmanship: Wyatt sat out the dual with AF Academy to keep from making his old team look bad. His sub still won the match.
-
John Smith might have had it right when he advocated for only the first takedown being 3 points.
-
The only answer is to make stalling a 2 point penalty. /sarc
.png)
