Jump to content

nhs67

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    9,567

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    70

 Content Type 

Everything posted by nhs67

  1. nhs67
    I don't read good enough to understand that, sorry. I did try, though.
  2. nhs67
    On Twatter? So again, mud gets thrown at you and you turn the other cheek and wipe it off...? That isn't how social media works today, bud.
  3. nhs67
    Yeah. Typing comprehension nore reading comprehension is @Paul158's strong suit, apparently. Also, I would challenge you (Paul) to watch Focus's matches thus far. I don't care what the scores are/were... they were not challenging for him. Sake for Sealey. I have not watched all of Locket's (yet).
  4. nhs67
    This was inaccurate. The Top 6 will place Top 6.
  5. nhs67
    5 - 3 over Novak after coming off injury needs no explanation. He gets that tank and he is contending. His length will gice Brooks and Hidlay fits, methinks.
  6. nhs67
    Not per the seeds.
  7. nhs67
    Like... I am okay not discussing this anymore because I actually think it is weak and pathetic to be on Pyle's ballsac over this. I seriously dislike that guy's character for many reasons already. This doesn't add to it for me. It can for you. Free rent.
  8. nhs67
    There was obviously ulterior motive in the Willie crap. The definition of wrong is the same in every dictionary and not a matter or moral factors. He did nothing wrong. Lack of maturity, sure. That was par for the discussion already as Borelli had already showed the same level of class... before Pulendid.
  9. nhs67
    Like... I don't even like Pyle. This whole rhetoric that he did something wrong is pathetic.
  10. nhs67
    If you want to fabricate something from twisted information just like the turdbiscuit on Twatter, go ahead. Free country. Pyle not once said American or any wrestler or coach from American didn't matter. So, turn the other cheek just like the coach did(n't) right? Weak.
  11. nhs67
    They all made sense so I was like 'Cool shit.'
  12. nhs67
    Also, @flyingcement, I legit thought your OP was the results for a bit.
  13. nhs67
    Yes.
  14. nhs67
    On twatter? This week? Nope.
  15. nhs67
    Every Top 5 seed at 165 has bonused both their prior matches so far. Two out of ten are Majors, the rest are Pin or Tech.
  16. nhs67
    So turn the other cheek mentality when idiots and ignorami run rampant in your comments? Had he done that we would be talking about his lack of testicular fortitude. He did nothing wrong.
  17. nhs67
    Oh god. @Husker_Du?!
  18. nhs67
    Are the six the same guys as the top five?
  19. nhs67
    Maybe, and that is a respectful maybe, a dozen or more other guys have the potential to beat Giddens, but the other five are heavy favorites to wrestle to seed. Injuries and off-days (and on-days) happen, but those top three especially? They're not going to lose to anyone not seeded in the Top 6.
  20. nhs67
    Per what DT was talking about he was currently 15lbs less than last year and wanted to get a little lighter. Being as he weighed in at 256.2lbs at B1Gs, I took that as him being ~241.2lbs from DT himself.
  21. nhs67
    WCAP is in as of now. All the usual suspects there plus Morgan McIntosh (Penn State) as well.
  22. nhs67
    Officially in, btw... https://www.flowrestling.org/articles/11616990-ioc-declares-russian-belarusian-wrestlers-eligible-for-the-2024-olympics
  23. nhs67
    https://www.trackwrestling.com/tw/predefinedtournaments/VerifyPassword.jsp?tournamentId=772817132
  24. nhs67
    Rankings aren't an opinion based thing. They should be based off actual results, not necessarily placement(s).
  25. nhs67
    Look at these two babyfaces...
×
×
  • Create New...