nhs67

Ah bugger, you are correct. To me I was putting the entire weekend in one bubble. (You never said yesterdat BTW - you said WEEKEND) Why did him not being there yesterday have anything to do with him not being able to get an at-large? What are you hopiD)ng to get out of it? You think him acting like a punk On Twatter, which is par for him, means he is not showing up? The kid knows how to get clicks and he knows it. Also, I was there in-person. I physically saw him there quite late Saturday - well after his second 'loss' of the day.

He was for at least three seconds +/- the time to walk to and from the mat.

Yes. We are on the same page. You still made a jab at something with an attemp at being facetious. You still never said that.

Where in any of this did you say that? ??

He legitimately weighed in and stepped on the mat twice, which is the requirement for inclusion. You are allowed an opinion, however. It is also wrong.

1 - Bastida 2 - Kerkvliet 3 - Hendrickson 4 - Schultz 5 - Elam 6 - Taylor 7 - Trephan 8 - Feldman 9 - Davison 10 - Ghadiali Schultz might be #6 as well withiut intervention. No RPI or QW will hurt him. He has conference title and coaches rank to help, though. Win percentage hurts against Elam. Taylor, Trephan, and Ghadiali have conference title going for them. I am for trusting the matrix, to be clear. If they bump Kerk up with intervention, I would be annoyed.

Not below 61 KG (134.5lbs) he hasn't. Weight classes exist for a reason.

You turd, Dr. @MPhillips. Appreciate it, my man. My offer still stands for anyone that comes in as a replacement.

Half of us flew in (Florid the other half drove (Michigan).

I am also travelling late tomortow as well. Will try to monitor throughout the day today and tomorrow, but focus is wrestling so if nobody takes me up I will likely pay (just for me) in the AM

I go to B1Gs or NCAAs each year, sometimes (rarely) both... depends on logistics.

Super stoked for this. First time I have all my boys with me, Kiddos, Grandkiddos. Atmosphere here is fire so far.

Who do I talk to about busted kneecaps?

I think the Big 13....err... 12 takes it.

Just randomly scrolling through wrestlestat today (it started when Arujau beat a guy via 8-2 Decision that he had Techd 19-4 earlier in the season, fwiw). Chaz Tucker, in the 2020 cancelled tournament year, went 31W-0L on the year with a 9% bonus rate. Is the the lowest bonus rate for any undefeated guy going in to natties?

Where's mine?!

VS

More were added this morning...

Does anyone love this?

I am traveling late today and in to tomorrow, so I won't see responses then. Life has been very busy the last month or two and my interactions here are via browser (I haven't caved for Tapatalk)... that's why you see me more active on Twatter. I have an app for that. Is Taptalk good? I had tried it like... ten years ago? It sucked hard then.

@VakAttack And this goes for anyone else as well. I believe I had paid for someone else last year - was anyone else wanting in that might want to use that offer again? I will pay on Sunday and wait for those who might want/need to join the help.

Was it the shoes? We all knew about the shoes, though.

Honestly, looking further in to some of the other weights, it makes me think that they took in to last years results as well. Either at EIWA, NCAA, or both. I get that to an extent. Still a no-brainer oversight.

If they were to come out and say 'Hey. We used a ratings system that is based purely on metrics.' then I would actually be satisfied... to an extent. I would have still expected some sort of coach review. It shouldn't have to just be the Binghamton coach (who should have said WTF with DePrez at 197 AND Nolan at 184) that should have pointed out "Hey... wtf... that is dumb." Unless all the coaches are clueless as to what is happening within the conference, particularly the #1 ranked/rated school (Cornell). If that is the case, then I think we aren't asking enough of head coaches. Seems quite simple. Keep in mind two from every conference do the coaches ranking, which is part of the AQ and seeding criteria for NCAAs.

What makes this horrendously stupid is that the change was basically due to the other wrestler being injured. Brands didn't want to do a wrestle-off between the two while Schriever was considerably hindered by injury. The NCAA is supposed to be a proponent for safety are they not? So penalize Schriever, potentially, for being forced to wrestle with a lingering injury... possibly permanently injuring him (no clue the details or how bad it could have been, but theoretically speaking I am not incorrect). Add it to the long list of stupid things. The B1G needs to get their shit together if they're going to leave the NCAA with the SEC. Hopefully they keep wrestling when they do.