Scouts Honor

thanks thats what i figured

whats going on

thats what im thinking...but why why the change back... although its not undoing the past changes... which would make sense if thats what they are thinking

Im not sure 3 points is the answer, but maybe... b/c it will just become freestyle where guys dont finish... DONT EVEN TRY... they just push them out

didn't we just de-emphasize champions a few years ago? now we are de-emphasizing the wrestle backs... why? NO PUSH OUT

btw I like Devaney as a venue.. perhaps a bit big .. but when the right team comes in.. its packed and loud. when did you attend at Devaney?

Devaney the current home of the Huskers, the coliseum at Nebraska, the old home, Iowa/Iowa State at carver, incredible OSU v. Nebraska at gallagher Iba and I chanced into a dual at ASU v. Nebraska . the asu venue was awesome. It would have been amazing had it been well attended we had just flown in for vacay over christmas break and few bowl games and had to speed to get there... missed the first match i think... the nebraska bench turned to see who was yelling go big red!

this year was kind of an anomaly for the finals as well. I can't remember the last time saturday night was this exciting . maybe Most fans remember how boring they can be and choose not to watch the average person does not watch wrestling, unless someone takes them by the hand and watches with them

i dont think it had anything to do with it but im surprised no one mentioned we are butting up against basketball. I think the cable numbers are down b/c of streaming. yes options are the same... but the smart buy is NOT cable.. so more people are using the streaming options. i have used Hulu for 5-6 years now..maybe more.. and have espn+ as part of it. oh i know what happened... my son and daughter were home... so they watched it with me... we didn't have 3 tv's in 3 different cities... sorry guys

did brooks say they couldn't go to school there? did he throw anybody off a building?

wear the shirt!!! bake the cake!!!!!

i have been told repeatedly that b/c Im a conservative that i am a terrorist. yet, brooks is in danger from a group that has been embraced by the correct ppl here (media) ... and that group has beliefs and ACTIONS which go way beyond most conservative views

if you dont stand for something you will fall for anything and many ppl nowadays are falling for some pretty stupid stuff being fed them.

i dont agree with what he said..not b/c it's not true... but b/c its inflammatory to a group or a dig at a group of people i do agree with his right to say it.. i still ask the question...why is he in danger?

but why would he be in trouble?

tell that to ESPN and their continued bowing to the religion of the left

its funny that people here are attacking brooks for attacking a religion.. when they are attacking EVERY religion... hmmm

there is a lot of that going around the last few years

a stain... out damned spot!!

im so sorry this is happening to you

im so sorry this happened to you

now explain obracketology

so then why did you have to ask if he is a liar?

ok both of you listen up numbers...189327489273489 mentioned that star was humble in his interview. i should have said i also saw a star tweet about max dean. very humble and praising max. so maybe star has grown. or maybe he hasn't. maybe he was always a good person. but other people find something bad to chip away at them... just like this whole brooks thread.... are you getting closer?