Idaho

Like many other tax ventures, and with dealing with high bankrolls, I am sure there will be some end arounds. " I would like to donate to the collective (wink wink)....but it sure would be nice to have ___________ in our lineup next year (wink wink)."

"Happy Birthday kids.... and if you're looking for a new car in 15 years, be sure to go to Joe's Used Cars.... welp... see ya."

It does make sense. Can the booster who is paying out for the NIL, write off the money as marketing for their business?

My apologies for being snarky...... Although Michigan is not "buying a title", their pickup of 4 AA including an NCAA champ is unprecedented. The idea that you can replace almost half your lineup with AA is mind boggling. This is an example of how a team can now buy their way into contention (not a title) and land a trophy. That was not going to happen otherwise. Even landing 2-3 AA as some teams have done is unprecedented. PSU didn't need it, but Iowa did to stay in trophy contention.

THey will happen much faster as well... might see more first round TF than we have ever seen.

I forgot all about this story... They best be getting things in order this summer before school starts.

That's a good question... He still could have gotten the 6 years with a redshirt and a COVID year.

Um.... I have no clue where you are getting that I believe that..... must be lost in translation somewhere along these last two pages... Your point is why I asked ""Post some examples about Stanford sports and them using NIL as an example of Stanford getting richer and being in contention for national titles as a result." ... because they are not - much the same as 90% of the teams. Could it happen down the road? Maybe. I guess we are agreeing on that???

Keeping track eh..... Don't try to hide it - haha.... remember when you said it was "Boise"? That's funny. I don't recall you ever actually saying what it was, but then again I don't read every post. For the sake of foregoing a 5th or 6th time of asking, what was your old board name?

It actually makes more sense that you are NJ Dan now that I think about it.... hmmm... switched your name from the last board..... refuses to talk about what your last name was on the last board......whereas I have always been Idaho as everybody on this board knows. . Hmm... interesting reverse psychology try there. Anyway.... Yeah we don't have as many huge donors as a lot of schools.... and as far as wrestling we have zero national titles in recent years....which is kind of the point in full circle.....

Great comeback? Good Ol'....? Wait what was your name on the old board before we switched? As a side note, are you an Iowa guy?

You clearly did not attend Clackamas Community College.... collectives are new to most universities. Oregon State put together a collective last summer but the university as whole did not really get it going until last fall with the DAM Nation Collective.

You disagree with me agreeing with you... sounds good...but nope, they are getting a redshirt just like every other wrestler outside of the Ivies. Their level of education doesn't matter... and if anything probably makes it a harder life in general to stay on top of things verses an Iowa for example. I also hear that Stanford, Penn and Cal Poly are pretty good degrees.

This is a university wide effort, i.e collective.... most school have them (if not all by now). Keep trying though. As a side note, this really isn't really an example of my question: "Post some examples about Stanford sports and them using NIL as an example of Stanford getting richer and being in contention for national titles as a result."

Post some examples about Stanford sports and them using NIL as an example of Stanford getting richer and being in contention for national titles as a result.

Haha.... Patrick Glory was certainly okay with just winning a conference championship. Yep, he jus put himself on par with the rest of the country.

Yeah I agreed and already said that.... "sure.... only applies to Ivies"

Sure..... but you used a bad example... that only applies to Ivies...Koll was only getting a redshirt year like every other school including Iowa. Not really getting an advantage there - more of a level playing field with the rest of the country. You know that.

"Rich getting richer" means that it will get even worse than it was before. That's what the suffix "er" means.... more. There is no doubt that a few teams have dominated over the years, which has been discussed on this board many times. The portal/NIL era has undoubtedly given those same teams an even greater advantage because of the money they have to get free-agents to fill weak weights. I'm fine with Koll not winning pac-12 titles - probably means my team has a good chance to win it. Regardless, he brought up good points.... and bad points- like winning a team trophy in 2 years. Not sure that's happening.

I’m not sure…. Yes, definitely some good young guys in there

Still some good names in the portal... any ideas? Caliendo, Pentz, Renteria, Eichens, Nolan, Bryan, Franek, Mastro, etc.

Are NIL deals one year deals? For some reason that's what I was thinking they were when connected to a booster at a school. Some pros and cons either way. Obviously guys that have NIL deals that are more national and outside the university boosters can do that (as well as guys on the senior level).

The PA posts about Marstellar, Nolf, etc. have been good. He brings some interesting facts to his posts. Good read.

Salted with some truth as well. Do you really think that the rich aren’t getting richer and able to buy their way to trophy contention every year? Despite the way Koll comes off he’s speaking what most wrestling fans know to be true.

I would agree. I’m not sure what high school kids are getting though. I only hear the rumors of the portal guys.