Jump to content

red viking

Members
  • Posts

    3,248
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by red viking

  1. Yes I did a thesis and am a state licensed professional geologist, still working in the field
  2. A geologist is a scientist. Omg are you dense.
  3. Whoever claimed that he said earth would cool 11 degrees is a liar.
  4. Its very different to anybody w very basic math, logic or science background. For example, today was 5 degrees cooler than yesterday. If present trends continue well be below freezing in 10 days. True, technically, but can you see how that is very different from simply saying it will be beloelw freezing in 10 days? It's very basic.
  5. Yes. He said, "if present trends continue..." That's very different from saying it will either way
  6. But you lied. He didn't say the earth would cool by that amount. Liar!!!
  7. Masters in Geology. Yes, I'm a scientist but not close to being an authority on climate. Regardless, the words "if present trends continue" that he provided makes your own claim a total lie.
  8. The statement "if present trends continue" makes it completely different. Today was 5 degrees cooler than yesterday. If present trends continue well be below freezing in 10 days. True, technically, but the context makes it somewhat worthless. Doesn't mean much. You'd have to be pretty dumb to think that means that it WILL happen.
  9. First, he was an ecologist, not climatologist. Second, he said "if present trends continue..." which makes it a completely different claim. Third, he was an outlier even if he was making that claim (which he wasnt). YOURE A TOTAL LIAR AND BUSTED. Has zero relevancy to anthropogenic climate change, which is unanimously accepted by actual climatologists.
  10. You talking about thus? From an article: "In 1970, ecologist Kenneth Watt told a Swarthmore College audience: "The world has been chilling sharply for about 20 years. If present trends continue, the world will be about 4 degrees colder for the global mean temperature in 1990 but 11 degrees colder in the year 2000. This is about twice what it would take to put us into an ice age."
  11. He said he'd like to be part of NATO. That's an ask. It's very simple. Never implied he would force it to happen. You did a Google search and cherry picked whatever you could find that used that word but 99% of the statements say he wants it or asked for it.
  12. Then Google the difference between a,demand and want. Countless articles explaining the difference. There are actually multiple differences.
  13. You should learn to read. Waiting for a quote from him that shows a "demand" to join NATO. STILL WAITING.
  14. How many said that, and how does that mean that EVERY climatologist is wrong on this particular issue? You're going back 50 years. Pathetic. Can u also show me one scientist that made those claims? It's literally almost as obvious as the sky being blue. Unreal.
  15. Show me the quote where he demanded to be part of NATO.
  16. Another fail. He didn't demand to be part of NATO. You're just drinking other peoples Kool aid.
  17. Demands and asks are very different. A 1st grader knows that. 100% FAIL.
  18. Those aren't "demands." Not even close.
  19. You claimed he "demanded" it so back up your bs claim w an actual quote.
  20. Ok, so the author said he was "demanding " it. Did Zelensky actually say that though? You just keep accepting whatever u want to believe.
  21. Yah, and they banned CFCs (which were causing a lot of the ozone issues) through the Montreal Protocol. This reversed the process. What's your point?
  22. They call it climate change because it's a lot more than just warming. It's accompanied by other climate-related changes such as frequency and magnitude of storm events and higher or lower overall precip, depending upon location. Some areas also see more warming than others (eg areas closer to the poles). There's also PLENTY of data, spacially and temporally, so the " variability" has no bearing on the overall warming trend observed. Yes, every PhD climatologist says that earth is warming overall, and due to fossil fuels. It's because ALL the data easily demonstrates that. EASILY. Not because of a grand funding conspiracy.
  23. "Demanding?" Yet another winger lie. Over and over.
×
×
  • Create New...