red viking

I did a google search and literally every article I see about this (none of which pop up on mainstream news sources for me) talk about how there was a backlash against the ad. So talking about the backlash but none are actually backlashing against it. I'm sure if I search enough pages I'll find something but seriously this is pathetic by the wingers.

Show me where these "protests in force" are. LMFAO.

Literally 99.9% of the people talking about this are wingers. It's unreal.

No, because they don't have jack squat for evidence. They're all serial liars.

High poverty areas tend to have higher crime. That's the way it always has been and always will. Rich people have limited motive to steal anything. The point of these stores is to improve the general conditions of the people that live in that area. It's never to make a profit and never will be.

City-run grocery stores can't be expected to make money. It's more a matter of how much money they'll lose. If there is a profit to be made in a specific area, there's always a business owner waiting to pounce on the opportunity. These stores are created in areas that are not profitable and that's why they're food deserts to begin with.

There are some decent human beings in all of those countries. Just as many as over here. Just clarifying; I'm sure you know that. However, there are factors at play that help evil people get into power in those places, including Israel.

Any credibility that you had is certainly gone now. Wow..the whack nuts on this forum that will literally believe anything.

Not enough evidence for a lawsuit maybe but there's probably circumstantial evidence in that file that Trump is a sick pedo, in general. Between what we know from and about various underage girls. Otherwise, he would have released it by now and wouldn't be so eager to get to Maxwell before Congress does.

Not sure what the hell you mean by this but, either way, we don't hand these countries blank checks and unlimited weapons to allow them to commit their atrocities.

Did she sue Eppinger? You need evidence to successfully sue somebody. Most sexual assaults/crimes occur and don't end up in court because there's limited evidence, if any.

Absolutely...100%, if evidence was truly "manufactured" in the first place. He had a lot more important things to worry about. He ordered the investigation but didn't actually do it himself. Plenty of bigger fish to fry.

It's amazing how Israel is held to a different standard than everybody else. If N. Korea did something like this it would be an atrocity. The hypocrisy of the right is never-ending.

LMFAO. Yah, "clear evidence" according to the Trump Administration. They're always 100% honest. Keep drinking the Kool Aid.

Yah; there's a bunch of evidence that Obama "manufactured" evidence. I'm still waiting for them to arrest him, since they have such a strong case. ....still holding my breath...I'm sure it will be any day now.....LMFAO

None of them every wanted Israel to have any land to start with. The Palestinians were given a very small area relative to their population. It was unfair to begin with and Israel has simply continued to hog more land and established control of that land based upon ethnicity. Goes against everything the U.S. is supposed to stand for.

It really should be 100%/0%. 1948 never should have happened. If we felt the need to hand over land to a specific ethno-religiion (and hence take it away from another) we should have given them some of our own land.

The wingers are unreal. You can't make this stuff up. Every time somebody attacks Israel, that gives them a license to permanently take land away from that country; as much as they want. Unreal.

It's pretty much all wingers that are talking about this. That's the point. It's big deal only in the delusional brains of the wingers. The liberals really aren't making a big deal about this, even though you can always find somebody that's upset about every single thing. There are plenty of dumb wingers out there too that get upset every time they see a black person in an ad.

This is literally one of the dumbest arguments I've ever heard. You expect Hamas not to take any food? As I've stated, when you have starvation and very limited food in an area, it is the people with weapons that will get a disproportionate amount of it. The way you fix this is to ensure that there's plenty of food so it isn't incredibly expensive. If you do that, then they won't have a reason to hoard it.

Yes; Hamas is bad. That's a straw man argument. Nobody is saying they aren't bad. That doesn't mean that Israel shouldn't take all practicable efforts to minimize the suffering of the civilian population there. Hamas has been defeated to the extent practicable. You'll never eliminate every single one of them.

Epitome of ethnic cleansing. Kick everybody of a particular ethno-religion out of the region and let another ethno-religion take over. Supported by the good 'ol USA and USA taxpayers. How far we've fallen..... We always talk about how bad Nazi Germany was but this is pretty close.

That will literally NEVER happen either. You can keep killing more and more of them but you'll never be able to kill every single one. Another b.s. argument from the right.

Yup. This forum is still the only place that I've heard about this. Has shown up exactly zero times on the moderate to left-of-center news sources that I read.

THis is a a perfect example of the wingers stupidity and lack of logic. Bring in very limited food into a starving area and the bad guys with guns will get it 100% of the time. Then they'll sell their surplus on the black market for a high price. There's no way to prevent the bad guys from getting some of the food. However, if you bring in PLENTY of food, then the price goes down and regular people including innocent children will get some. It's very simple. Let the food come in and people won't starve. Limit the food supply and it's the children and other weaker people that will starve. Every time. I can't believe how dumb the wingers are to not understand this very simple concept.