Jump to content

Jimmy Cinnabon

Members
  • Posts

    2,898
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Jimmy Cinnabon

  1. Where? How did you come to the conclusion that a 17-2 record with 52.63% bonus was a better season than 21-0 record with a 90.48% bonus rate
  2. @Fletcher waiting for you to address how Starocci's performance this year was worse than last year....
  3. Hardy is "only" 25. He'll be 26 in a month.
  4. Gable forgets to set his alarm clock and oversleeps the semis!
  5. How has Carter performed worse this year than last year? Last year: 17-2, 52.63% bonus rate This year: 21-0, 90.48% bonus rate Your argument that he "almost lost" doesn't hold water.
  6. Why should moving up a weight influence ranking? Did Starocci show that he is a less dominant wrestler at 184 than he was last year at 174? Did he not show by beating Keck head to head at the All-Star match that him moving up didn't hinder his performance? Using your logic, if last year's 197 pound champion moved down to 184 would he deserved to be ranked higher than Keck because he is naturally the bigger person?
  7. 125: #11 Nicolar Rivera 133: #11 Evan Frost 141: #8 Andrew Alirez 149: #8 Jordan Wiliams 157: #12 Caleb Fish 165: #9 Cam Steed 174: #8 Lenny Pinto 184: #10 Edmond Ruth 197: #13 Trey Munoz HWT: #10 Dayton Pitzer
  8. He's so old that he shrunk into 125.
  9. Too bad Nelson Brands isn't wrestling...I think he would win.
  10. I mean, they've shown the math using the actual seeding criteria, so the premise of your thread has been objectively proven incorrect. So while you think it's "unfair" according to the agreed seeding criteria this is the only "fair" result. It sounds like your actual beef is with the seeding criteria. It sounds like you want to add a component that takes into account previous year results and whether someone was in the weight class the previous year.
  11. How has defending champ Richie Figs looked this year? I know he has two losses and did not win the Pac-12, and I know Luke Lilledahl is more talented than Braeden Davis, but I can't hope but be fearful that Figs will dethrone yet another #1 seed from Penn State at 125 like he did to Davis last year.
  12. Did you do the math and find that the criteria favored Keck over Starocci?
  13. Looks like the only way these two will ever wrestle is if they both make the finals this year! Arnold ducking again!
  14. Starocci won the big ten which is better than the big 12. That is undisputed.
  15. Isn't Hendrickson seeded higher than Kerk?
  16. If want to count past seasons you have to factor in 4 NCAA titles > 1 NCAA title.
  17. He had 2 losses (same as Hall) but Hall won his conference.
  18. Good draw for Lilledahl
  19. About to get started...
  20. That’s how the rule is supposed to work but they were calling it the opposite way
  21. At Big 10s getting pushed out meant an auto stall call on the wrestler getting pushed out.
  22. FRL talked about it. There are rules on what kind of underwear you weigh in in. You can't wear a thong, for example.
  23. Didn't Caldwell beat him earlier that season (by fall)?
  24. Caesar beat Gable in the semis, not the finals
×
×
  • Create New...