mspart

The original post breakdown: Because she disagreed, basically. Thesis is that she was arrested because she disagreed with federal law. She very well could have disagreed with established federal immigration law. Does that give her a right to break that law, circumvent that law? If so, she is above the law, and you continually says that no one is above the law. The blatant attempt to become a dictator is getting increasingly disturbing. How does a person attempt or try to become a dictator? That is a crazy idea. They either do or they don't. You are not a dictator by enforcing established immigration law that has been on the books for like forever? Just because the law was not enforced in the previous admin, does not mean that the current one cannot enforce it. Homan has been saying this will happen if people obstruct justice. Looks like he was right. A true constitutional crisis. Are you kidding me? Enforcement of the law is the basis for a constitutional crisis? It was the non enforcement of the law that was the crisis. Your opinion here , like in other threads, is not based on any fact or law. I do not wish your version of government on anyone. mspart

So you can read the whole Bondi statement : Wild! Attorney General Pam Bondi explains what really happened with Milwaukee Judge Hannah Dugan that led to her arrest by FBI: "The Judge learns that ICE was outside to get the guy, because he had been deported in 2013, came back into our country, charged with committing these crimes, victim is in court. Judge finds out. She goes out into the hallway. Screams at the immigration officer. She's furious. Visibly shaken. Upset. Sends them off to talk to the chief judge. "She comes back into the courtroom. You're not going to believe this. Takes the defendant and the defense attorney back in her chambers. Takes them out a private exit and tells them to leave. While the state prosecutor and victims of domestic violence are sitting in the courtroom." Based on her reported behavior, it does not sound good for the WI judge. If convicted, she should lose her bar credentials, law license, and judgeship. She might be absent for awhile. mspart

I think he got his knee stretched. He got taken down, and rolled twice when he started grabbing his knee. He got rolled one or two more times and stayed down. Tough way to go out. mspart

mspart

https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/us-allies-line-up-trade-deals-90-day-tariff-pause Some 75 countries have now reached out wanting to negotiate with the White House on trade deals, and 15 countries are in active negotiations https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-administration/trump-faces-imposing-timeline-broker-75-trade-deals-less-90-days-rcna200793 Trump faces imposing timeline to broker 75 trade deals in less than 90 days Just why are 75 countries lining up? mspart

RV says he wants to reduce expenditures, yet complains mightily to the DOGE effort to do just that. He wants people who break the law to be held accountable, just not illegal immigrants nor leftist judges. He wants something unless it affects leftist efforts. In other words, he doesn't really want what he says he wants. mspart

Yet they wrote them because they could predict human behavior. mspart

Real Estate fraud? I can't believe she would prosecute Trump for the same thing after doing it herself. What? Did she not think she would be found out? And it is across state lines so that puts it in the federal purview. Poor poor Letitia. Dumb people making dumb decisions. mspart

Federal Law does not distinguish between a judge dong this, or a normal citizen. What RV wants is to have some people above the law. But he was complaining about that not long ago. It's ok today, not tomorrow. Maybe RV is just upset that it happened to a WI judge. Well, the WI judge should not have broken federal law. Immigration law hasn't changed. Enforcement has. mspart

Ok, it may happen in the future. But today he is not disbarred. That is what you are saying and that is what we have been saying. But you continue to say he is disbarred when he is not officially disbarred. He may be disbarred, but he is not now disbarred. Do you not see the difference? mspart

Back to Abrego: https://foxbaltimore.com/news/local/custody-disputes-gang-forms-protective-orders-documents-emerge-involving-abrego-garcia Custody filings obtained by FOX45 News show the man who appears to be the father of Vasquez Sura’s two youngest children filed for an emergency custody hearing in August 2018. The man, Edwin Ramos, claimed the children were in serious danger because Vasquez Sura “is dating a gang member.” So Edwin Ramos wanted custody of the kids he had with Abrego's now wife because Abrego was a gang member. Abrego was pulled over in TN while hauling 8 people from Houston in his bosses car. His boss has been convicted of human trafficking. Yes, this is a peaceful guy living in MD. mspart

I think we are getting smoke tubes soon to smoke cheese. That should be fun. mspart

Ideally this is correct. But in reality, if this had happened in the US to some dude, there would be massive outrage. There was no outrage for the Obama strike. Those same that had no outrage for the Obama strike now have outrage about anything Trump does, even when he said his goal is to deport all illegal aliens. He does it, they outrage. But I think few in the US truly care about this guy who was not peaceful and has a rap sheet and good riddance. If they bring him back to face deportation, what will be the result? He will get deported per Turley https://jonathanturley.org/2025/04/24/npr-abrego-garcia-was-living-quietly-in-maryland-before-he-was-deported/ The only reason that Abrego Garcia was not removed is that he said that he was being threatened by a gang that could harm him in El Salvador. That gang, however, reportedly no longer exists. More importantly, President Trump has declared MS-13 a Foreign Terrorist Organization, which bars the use of the justification for his not being removed. In other words, he has little factual or legal foundation under his original claims to remain in the country. I think Turley is correct. mspart

He has not been disbarred. He has been recommended for disbarment. That is like Pres Trump being impeached. He has been recommended for removal but not removed. Recommending disbarment and being disbarred are two separate things. mspart

Not too many in the US was concerned about the offing of this guy. He was plainly on the wrong side. But I was unaware that the Obama admin took this position. mspart