mspart

Exhibit A: https://www.wsj.com/politics/biden-white-house-age-function-diminished-3906a839 How the White House Functioned With a Diminished Biden in Charge Aides kept meetings short and controlled access, top advisers acted as go-betweens and public interactions became more scripted. The administration denied Biden has declined. https://www.mediaite.com/tv/dem-strategist-predicts-party-has-its-own-tea-party-revolt-coming-we-brought-this-on-ourselves/ Dem Strategist Predicts Party Has Its Own ‘Tea Party’ Revolt Coming: ‘We Brought This On Ourselves’ Democratic strategist Julie Roginsky said on Thursday she believes a “tea party” revolt is imminent in the Democratic Party following a bombshell report suggesting concerns about President Joe Biden’s mental and physical state stretch all the way back to the first months of his presidency. Please keep in mind that Julie said these things as a result of the wsj report. mspart

I think we will find that if this case is not dismissed by Judge Merchan, then a appellate court in NY will throw it out for speciousness. Which is what we have been saying all along. You can't have a felony conviction if you don't even have an indictment of specific charges. The specific charges in the indictment that Bragg brought was "other crimes". I have detailed this a number of times. Can you be a little more specific Bragg? Even the judge at the end in the instructions to the jury said you can find he is guilty of 3 different crimes. You don't have to be unanimous on the specific crime, just be unanimous that he is guilty of something and that is good enough. You just don't have this in a felony case or any other case for that matter unless the defendant is Donald Trump. In fact the case where he was found liable for sexual misconduct, the lady couldn't even remember when the alleged misconduct took place. But in Trump's case, that is enough to have a court case and find him liable. That one will also be thrown out I believe. And then there is the no crime case that was brought against Trump and he now owes 450 million dollars to NY. No one was harmed, everyone was paid what was owed, and there was not victim. But none of that matters as long as the defendant is Donald Trump. I have to say if they went after Biden like this I would laugh but know that it was a farce. You guys on the left can't even go there. Blinders on. Rational thought eviscerated. Mindless sheep. It is a sad state to be in for sure mspart

The goal is the same. Why does it matter who met with who. Your concern was the topic. Now that I called you out on it you turn to the who of the story. Same topic, your guy did it. What's the problem? There is no problem it is all in your head. mspart

Why do you think they put together such huge bills RV? It is to hide all the ludicrous spending they want. You are not being logical here. You are only concerned with the second bill and not the first one that the Ds helped craft. You should be ecstatic that that bill did not pass. Instead, you make excuses on whay it wasn't so bad. Yes, you are obviously a real deficit hawk. mspart

More pages = increasing the deficit and debt. That is axiomatic. mspart

How is this any different than President Biden worried about ticket fees? Isn't he more important than an AG? This is exactly the same but in your myopic view you cannot see that your guy is doing the very same thing. Might want to look inward before throwing ill considered bombs. mspart

mspart

I'd have to say I am happy the 1500 page bill with increased spending and you should too RV. At least the new bill was 1/10th the size in pages as the original bill. Perhaps, the next one will be 5 pages long. Something that a real person can read. mspart

The President gets the clearance. Everyone else has to quailify for it. I think that is how it goes. How can you refuse to give the President the clearance? mspart

Good points LD. mspart

Ya mon. mspart

I can't imagine wanting that job. Same with President. mspart

WKN - He's asking you a simple question of what are the 34 unique felonies. You are making his point by not answer the question. In addition, from a legal standpoint, Trump is not convicted, he was found guilty. There is a legal difference between the two. Legally he was found guilty. Legally, he has not been convicted. msaprt

I don't remember you pointing this at Twitter or tiktok. I thought you were talking being accurate if you were a news guy. I just pointed out a few inaccuracies that the media ran with and still hold to even in the face of evidence to the contrary. If you were just talking Twitter and tiktok, ok. I don't disagree. mspart

One would think accuracy would be the thing they would want to make sure of. examples of the MSM looking for accuracy: We have mostly peaceful protests amid prolific arson and looting We have insurrection when there have been no such charges applied We have Steele dossier that was known to be a democrat plant and false We have Kavanaugh is a serial sexual pervert We have Trump was found liable for rape. ABC is paying 15 million for that one. A news media looking for accuracy would not state these things and most every MSM outlet did state these things. mspart