mspart

That was pretty quick. I am happy that a broadcast network takes the threat of losing its broadcast license seriously. Carr of the FCC cited this: Carr has justified his hands-on approach by citing a 1934 law which states that “because a given broadcast network is granted airwaves to use exclusively as its own, it needs to operate in ‘public interest, convenience and necessity,” according to The WSJ. Is misleading the public in the public interest, convenience and necessity? I don't think so. Kimmel made a statement, not an opinion. He stated as fact that the shooter was maga because maga is doing everything they can to not have him be maga. Well, the shooter is not maga. If you don't know if the shooter is maga, don't say he is. It's very simple. Conjecture is not news. But conjecture provided as truth and news is news and can mislead people into believing falsehoods. That is not in the public interest, convenience, and necessity. At least in my opinion. All Kimmel had to do was say this was his opinion, or this is satire, or a joke, and he probably would have been fine. But he was too full of himself and has gotten away with this sort of thing for so long that he was not concerned with the truth of the matter because he didn't need to tell the truth before. I think he, and ABC, have a different opinion now. mspart

If Madison isn't having a problem, then I'm sorry to say your wish may not be granted. If Madison is having a problem, if the feds come it will be to aid the locals so you'll be paying more for law enforcement in Madison than you normally would. mspart

I'm not so sure. He did not think he would get caught. He thought he was too smart for that. And then drops his gun, and blabs all over the internet and allows his picture to be taken, so that he did just about everything possible to get caught all while thinking he outsmarted the authorities. Plus he did a good thing, how will he be caught for that? So family and lover were not even a concern. He was home free for a day. mspart

You don't pay fed taxes? We all pay for law enforcement unless it is not being done. Which is the case in many big cities, Seattle and Portland included. mspart

Didn't he say that it is the left is the party of murder? I have seen this in various conservative media. mspart

Did Trump send NG to Chicago? That's the thread here. But I'll open it up, did he send them to Memphis? I heard interviews with people in Memphis saying if it will stop or reduce crime, bring them on. When your politicians will not protect you, you will accept assistance from anyone willing to give it. Even Trump. You know, it would be in everyone's best interest if they cleaned up their cities on their own and didn't wait for Trump to show them up and take away their votes by showing action works. I don't think they are smart enough to think that through. By saying NO to Trump, he will come with help and clean up the city and the people will be astounded and hopefully they will take action to stop this by voting the idiots out of office. The Feds cannot take over continually. It must be given back to the locals to continue the fix. Again, if they fail that, I predict they will be voted out. They should be. City leaders that refuse to protect citizens from crime and violence don't deserve to be city leaders. mspart

He should go on FOX and they ambush him with that. mspart

You might want to rethink this line of thought. It is not funny and it is quite rude. It is not becoming. mspart

Yes this can be applied horribly by either of the political spectrum. The problem really isn't speculation, it is trying to pass off speculation as the real deal. If you say you are speculating, then it is ok. When you say he was maga when he wasn't, then that is speculation and not saying so. I don't think there is anything wrong with holding these media types to some level of honest reporting. Ideally, the people would do that. But it appears that does not happen. mspart

Boy, does this send a message!! No more speculation, just the facts ma'am. mspart

So he deserved it because he deflected a question? Or was the shooter there ready to kill him no matter what he said. You make it sounds like if he had answered a questions with something different, Mr. Kirk would still be alive and well. mspart

I've wondered this as well. Stem on the apple? Male. No stem on the apple? Female. It has been so since time immemorial. It doesn't take a biologist to make this determination. It just is, it is observable, it is not assigned. My male dogs were misgendered as assigned at birth. What? That makes no sense. Neither does it with regard to humans. mspart

So we see the difference between the right and the left. Some unknown man in Minneapolis dies and the whole country goes up in flames. A very well known conservative is shot to death and there is calm. Which do you think will attract more people? mspart

$205 is a sizeable amount. Maybe don't film and broadcast ludicrous behavior. Dang you mean there are consequences for behavior? That's not what I have been told. I thought I could do anything I like and not suffer any consequences. As a side note, is there anyone on here that thinks this person had any concern for someone on the right who got doxxed, ran out of town, etc. What is good for thee is not good for me. It's the same story in all these cases. Entitled people thinking they can do anything they want surprised there is anger about the behavior. mspart

Agreed mspart