jross

Fine. 12 Angry Men. It could be the ex-marine Lucy with a rifle on the building who was upset that Kirk made eye contact with her husband on April 1st, 2023 at 3:45 PM Pacific.

You are wrong on his importance. Not MLK but known by millions!

Kirk was dangerous in that he was a huge influence on minds. That is enough. He had multiple people challenge him to fight at his debates and more than a few death threats based on the offense people took. Simple truths like a man is not a woman can inflame. There is rumor that about a particular foreign government. When throwing out conspiracy… how about this being done on purpose to stoke anger. Then we’d need a big target on the left that appears as revenge. When you get the people angry… they might support policies that further restrict autonomy. The part that confuses me is if a civilian is rationale enough to meticulously plan and execute their getaway, that they would be irrational enough to take offense to Kirk. But I am not smart. I do not understand how leftist like the sport of wrestling…

weak!

Still have to know enough to make the scope accurate. That alone disqualifies nancy and peter.

Could be a civilian, not an amateur.

It definitely was to shut him up. We don’t know by whom and to what end.

https://www.fox9.com/news/donald-trump-mn-lawmaker-shootings-melissa-hortman-john-hoffman

The first time i really understood shocking evil existed was college when the crowd encouraged a dorm roomer to jump to his death. It shook my reality.

Celebrating or dismissing Kirk's murder is like saying, hey world, I, I value murder over words. It is a dark line to cross.

There was no confusion that the famous person that debates opinions was murdered in front of thousands of people. Millions have now seen the assassination.

Good morning. Please take your words out of my mouth. I denounce their killings. I do not need to denounce through comments on every killing. I should not imply they had it coming and be gleeful about it.

That story was so confusing… the initial public misinformation, footage, and fact he survived are different…

The context of a famous person shot in a huge public crowd where everyone knows it is for his ideas is different than the sad story of two people most have never heard of… Kirk was news most days...

Yes

You regulate evil by voting your culture into the positions that define evil and wrong think. I am thankful those in power now define actions in the left photo as good and the actions in the right photo as evil. People that believe violence is caused by offensive words rather than their own choices… these people cannot be helped. Just keep them out of power to contain the disease.

Um… what about the years of urban gun violence… well before 1998…

Principles over personal outcomes…

Of course. But it can be safer. Maybe if a smart gun was regulated, Kirk would be alive. Facepalm.

you are free to not be shot for your speech

I agree with Charlie

Just the facts

It is time to trip and sweep some members to the zoo. “When you tear out a man's tongue, you are not proving him a liar, you're only telling the world that you fear what he might say.” ― George R.R. Martin, A Clash of Kings

He is dead. No way he survived the shot.

Charlie Kirk shot by nutcase.