VakAttack

HE DOESN'T GIVE HIS SOURCES, MAN WHAT ARE YOU NOT UNDERSTANDING? If you're asking for the data that shows he's wrong, that has already been provided to you, your just choosing to ignore it and claiming it's been discredited because...you say so. See if you can find another video where a shill makes your argument for you because you can't actually formulate it yourself.

That's fine. Don't show up. I wouldn't have criticized him. Once you're there, though...finish out at least on the championship side. And if you're going to pull out of the even, you can't have your father being the one giving statements. If for some reason you can't physically give a statement, release a written statement.

Yes. The NRA is bad. And, in this case, biased. But glad to see your abandoning ship on prior arguments. I've made the point several times. You are saying that I'm not making an argument of fact when I am providing you several sets of data. Then you cite a video (over and over and over and over again) to make your argument for you, where he just cites data, but doesn't given a single source for it, whereas I'm proving you sources that show you (and he) are wrong. Seriously, every accusation is a confession.

Again. He says a bunch of stuff without actually citing any sources (which I know is right up your alley) and he's a person Pais by the NRA. You keep saying he's not now, but he still has the NRA stuff on his personal website, and also, the video was published 3 years ago. And people, myself including me, have posted ACTUAL DATA WITH SOURCES and your response is just the same unsourced YouTube video because you.. like what it says and confirms your pre-existing beliefs, and you just claim that all other data is misleading and_or discredited, again without sources. Amazing. And still people die.

The YouTube video by an NRA funded moron that does the same thing you do: just make claims without backing them up. In the description of the video it puts a link that says "Gun Violence by the Numbers" and when you click on it.... https://shop.mrcolionnoir.com/collections/keep-america-tactical-merchandise?utm_source=Youtube&utm_medium=Video -TheTruthAboutGunViolence&utm_campaign=Video -&utm_content=TheTruthAboutGunViolence Honestly. You couldn't write a better script for embarrassing yourself.

I see we're in MAGA Mad Libs portion of the proceedings.

Ahhh, blanket statements again without anything backing it up, just you saying it.

LOL you just keep posting videos, man. Especially from people who literally are on the NRA's payroll, like this guy. I'm providing you with actual data. Here's some more: https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/04/26/what-the-data-says-about-gun-deaths-in-the-u-s/ And, then there's the pure, true blue fact that: this doesn't happen anywhere else.

You're not showing numbers, fool.

LOL. That was a link to nothing. You cited it. ANd you have nothing to back it up. Here's something that provides actual data. https://www.thetrace.org/2022/06/defensive-gun-use-data-good-guys-with-guns/

That's the link on the Heritage Foundation page that YOU cited.

The link where the Heritage Foundation claims that the CDC says that "Americans use their firearms defensively between 3 million and 500,000 times per year" is this: https://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/cdc-study-use-firearms-self-defense-important-crime-deterrent Go ahead, click on the link.

It is NOT a study from the CDC. Please, cite the CDC study. Because let me tell you what the CDC says on the matter, taken directly from their wesbite: Although definitions of defensive gun use vary, it is generally defined as the use of a firearm to protect and defend oneself, family, other people, and/or property against crime or victimization. Estimates of defensive gun use vary depending on the questions asked, populations studied, timeframe, and other factors related to study design. Given the wide variability in estimates, additional research is necessary to understand defensive gun use prevalence, frequency, circumstances, and outcomes.

Oh, look, more idiocy and just claiming things without backing it up. Now post another Youtube video. EDIT: I could not have timed this more perfectly, since the moron posted another Youtube video.

No, the idea that there are more people defending themselves then victims of gun violence is just you making it up. You have literally not provided any data saying that.

LOL at you pretending to analyze data when you're literally just posting a link to something the Heritage Foundation has spoon-fed to you and you just choose to take it as gospel.

Here's some numbers for you: using all the anecdotes you've laid out here, you still haven't reached the number of people victimized yesterday, in that one particular shooting in Texas, the literal gun capitol of the country.

This is literally just made up.

Truly unbelievable. Laughs claiming the "numbers ain't on [my] side" then provides a series of anecdotes and a Heritage Foundation link that includes, you guessed it, anecdotes.. Guess what, dipshit, the numbers are, in fact, on my side. You can tell that when you compare gun crimes here to gun crimes anywhere else in the developed world. When a mass shooting happens in another country, it's a tragedy that rocks the nation. In the USA, that's Tuesday.

Any day now. https://www.cbsnews.com/texas/news/man-witnessed-allen-outlet-mall-shooting/

I would agree that nobody could argue that Steveson is the GOAT based on numbers.

GOAT is a subjective idea, unless you're going to do it purely by numbers, in which case there's no point in discussing anything; it's just math.

I disagree with the assertion that he looked super slick. He looked off from the jump, he was just so far above his opponents level-wise it didn't matter. But there was no indication of any new injury, and if he was healthy enough to go out there for those first three matches, there is no indication he was any less healthy so as he could not wrestle against Suriano...and as mentioned, having your dad give the message...it was lame.

Look. I was there. There's no denying that Spencer looked lame having his dad give an interview and pulling out before the Suriano match. I do believe he is hurt. But if you show up, and then forfeit before your first high level match, it looks terrible. Either don't go, or go and wrestle until you lose, and then forfeit out afterward like everybody else.

Griffith to Michigan. @nhs67 is partying HARD next year as they're in prime position to finish second again.