Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

Pretty standard. The one that jumps out to me is Kade Brown being #18 at 149. He has a win from last year over #12 Clark and one from this summer over #10 Joy (Freestyle). His only loss to a guy still in college is #5 Paniro (other losses last year were to senior AAs). I am not saying he should be ranked top 10, but I am just curious about the thought process behind that, since these seem to be primarily results-based

Posted (edited)

I think the thought process is that he lost to Abas last year, who lost to Fernandez (Cornell) at NCAAs and Buesgens (NC State) at ACCs.  Doesn't seem to go much further than that.

Edit:  Freestyle results don't count/matter.

Edited by nhs67
  • Bob 1

"I know actually nothing.  It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, nhs67 said:

I think the thought process is that he lost to Abas last year, who lost to Fernandez (Cornell) at NCAAs and Buesgens (NC State) at ACCs.  Doesn't seem to go much further than that.

Edit:  Freestyle results don't count/matter.

That makes sense, and I understand that freestyle doesn't count. However, Joy has no wins (although the quantity is impressive) over anyone in the top 20, so his ranking at 10 (even though his ability could warrant it) doesn't seem entirely logical to me based on the system they seemingly are employing

Posted
1 hour ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

They typically do not rank incoming freshmen. If you were to rank the freshmen, who would they be, and where would you rank them?

133: Blaze 4

He might be the only guy I would rank off rip. (because you can only rank one of Duke/Kasak and Dee has no results to gauge with, on ability, he would be top 5) Other than Mendoza, I don't know of any other big name freshman who are projected to be  starting this year

 

  • Fire 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, wrestlingfan22 said:

That makes sense, and I understand that freestyle doesn't count. However, Joy has no wins (although the quantity is impressive) over anyone in the top 20, so his ranking at 10 (even though his ability could warrant it) doesn't seem entirely logical to me based on the system they seemingly are employing

I agree with you on the basis of Jaxon Joy being ranked as highly as him.  He had 29 wins compared to 1 loss.  They must be giving him lofty rankings based off his quantity of wins.  He has a loss to Catrabone, who is unranked, so I'm not sure the logic.

  • Bob 1

"I know actually nothing.  It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me

 

 

Posted
10 minutes ago, nhs67 said:

I agree with you on the basis of Jaxon Joy being ranked as highly as him.  He had 29 wins compared to 1 loss.  They must be giving him lofty rankings based off his quantity of wins.  He has a loss to Catrabone, who is unranked, so I'm not sure the logic.

Yea I am assuming they have Catrabone at 157 where he did not have that many matches so he's not ranked? Or they are waiting for the 157/165 situation to sort itself out?

Posted
1 hour ago, Jimmy Cinnabon said:

Davis is ranked at 141

When the options are beer gut or ride the pine, the only acceptable answer is to crack a Busch Latte and work on getting out from bottom.

  • Haha 1

i am an idiot on the internet

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...