Starving Children in Gaza

[whaletail]

Interviews are always edited, and I've never seen any evidence that 60 minutes edited hers to improve her political outlook.

If you can provide credible evidence suggesting otherwise, please post a link, but the above isn't it.

[Caveira]

14 minutes ago, whaletail said:

They destroyed the fat f*ck, with receipts, and not a peep in response.

And the he got re elected.  So much winning lol.  Y’all got him 

[whaletail]

1 minute ago, JimmySpeaks said:

ABC paid him $15 million. CBS settled because they knew they were screwed. 

So the merger was just background noise, eh? Nothing to see there?

All you're proving is that Trump and his cronies are using the government to try and silence anyone and anything they disagree with.

I'm not sure why you're okay with being sh&t on by your own government like a battered wife, but jesus christ man, gain some self respect.

[El Luchador]

1 hour ago, whaletail said:

He wasn't calling you a Nazi, moron. 

He cited the circumstances surrounding Anne Frank's death to highlight the fact that one needn't directly murder someone to be responsible for their death.

So his constant references to Nazis is a simple coincidence? And stating we would be making excuses for them has nothing to do with us being Nazi sympathizers?  How foolish of me to make such an observation. Although I don't think his constant references to Nazis is just a coincidence.

[JimmySpeaks]

8 minutes ago, whaletail said:

So the merger was just background noise, eh? Nothing to see there?

All you're proving is that Trump and his cronies are using the government to try and silence anyone and anything they disagree with.

I'm not sure why you're okay with being sh&t on by your own government like a battered wife, but jesus christ man, gain some self respect.

The MSM is and has been out to get Trump since his first term.  They’ve supported, hid information and lied for the Dems on numerous occasions.  The media corruptly doing what they are should scare you ALOT.  Im 100% for the first two amendments and I’m against more government unlike you wokesters are. Oh and I’ve got more self respect in my pinky toe than you’ll ever have skippy. 

Edited 15 hours ago by JimmySpeaks

[El Luchador]

19 minutes ago, whaletail said:

Interviews are always edited, and I've never seen any evidence that 60 minutes edited hers to improve her political outlook.

If you can provide credible evidence suggesting otherwise, please post a link, but the above isn't it.

You clearly have never heard the actual response she gave verses the the one they aired. 

[El Luchador]

21 minutes ago, whaletail said:

Interviews are always edited, and I've never seen any evidence that 60 minutes edited hers to improve her political outlook.

If you can provide credible evidence suggesting otherwise, please post a link, but the above isn't it.

Eat crow

 

 

 

[JimmySpeaks]

27 minutes ago, whaletail said:

Interviews are always edited, and I've never seen any evidence that 60 minutes edited hers to improve her political outlook.

If you can provide credible evidence suggesting otherwise, please post a link, but the above isn't it.

I have.  Google is your friend skippy.  They wouldn’t have settled otherwise. Derp 

[whaletail]

5 minutes ago, Caveira said:

And the he got re elected.  So much winning lol.  Y’all got him 

You're right we lost. But at least we're not welcoming our own ruination.

When they shovel sh^t down all of our throats, at least we're not trying to convince ourselves it's chocolate.

You're covered in sh!t, convinced you're on their team.

 

 

[Caveira]

1 minute ago, whaletail said:

You're right we lost. But at least we're not welcoming our own ruination.

When they shovel sh^t down all of our throats, at least we're not trying to convince ourselves it's chocolate.

You're covered in sh!t, convinced you're on their team.

 

 

I didn’t even vote for Trump boss.  In any election.   And the democrats have what a 18% approval rating.  I think the shoveling is going on a different direction.   

Edited 15 hours ago by Caveira

[scourge165]

16 hours ago, El Luchador said:

So you have a monopoly on the truth? How convenient.

... are you alright?

Me pointing out that both sides use propaganda is a "monopoly on the truth?"
 

Man, you're really triggered about that whole "Biggest threat to domestic terrorism, aren't you."

[scourge165]

4 hours ago, Caveira said:

Remember when they edited Kamala Harris’s interview ?

 

Remember when they edited Trump's?

 

[whaletail]

You're like an

5 hours ago, JimmySpeaks said:

The MSM is and has been out to get Trump since his first term.  They’ve supported, hid information and lied for the Dems on numerous occasions.  The media corruptly doing what they are should scare you ALOT.  Im 100% for the first two amendments and I’m against more government unlike you wokesters are. Oh and I’ve got more self respect in my pinky toe than you’ll ever have skippy. 

Fox News has been America's dominant political media presence for two decades. And they have been much more aggressively partisan than their supposed left wing peers, MSNBC included. The number of ex-Fox News employees in Trump's current administration is unprecedented, and I'm not even sure whether Hegseth is the most ridiculous example.

No wonder the dipshit can't even begin to do his job (his unsecured text chats during the Iran missile strike being the most egregious)

Regarding the examples of "MSM corruption" cited in this thread, only the 60 Minutes edit is even suggestive of left wing media partisanship, and I haven't watched that video yet. I'll comment on it more definitively this afternoon.

As mentioned previously, the ABC and CBS settlements actually illustrate this administration's concerted effort to silence its critics however possible. The underlying facts of neither case are indicative of media partisanship, and despite your claims to the contrary, context matters.

Meanwhile, the Dominion v. Fox News defamation trial actually exposed the exact sort of corruption you mention. While consistently, and continually claiming on-air that Biden stole the 2020 election, pundits including Sean Hannity, Tucker Carlson and Jesse Whatever (among others) acknowledged in emails that they knew such claims were patently false.

They knew Trump's stolen election claims were complete bullsh!t, and constantly mocked him in emails to each other, while unashamedly lying to the American public every night.

I do agree that individual investigative journalists are almost universally left leaning, but they have no incentive to lie in the manner you claim. Not only are the legal teams at CNN, NYT et al. extremely cautious, their owners certainly aren't left leaning.

Finally, the American public seems to be much more centrist than left leaning, with at least 30-40% are firmly on the right. Given those demographics, why would any media outlet act against its own interests in the manner you claim?

 

[whaletail]

12 hours ago, El Luchador said:

You clearly have never heard the actual response she gave verses the the one they aired. 

I'll watch the video - and respond - as soon as I can.

[JimmySpeaks]

38 minutes ago, whaletail said:

You're like an

Fox News has been America's dominant political media presence for two decades. And they have been much more aggressively partisan than their supposed left wing peers, MSNBC included. The number of ex-Fox News employees in Trump's current administration is unprecedented, and I'm not even sure whether Hegseth is the most ridiculous example.

No wonder the dipshit can't even begin to do his job (his unsecured text chats during the Iran missile strike being the most egregious)

Regarding the examples of "MSM corruption" cited in this thread, only the 60 Minutes edit is even suggestive of left wing media partisanship, and I haven't watched that video yet. I'll comment on it more definitively this afternoon.

As mentioned previously, the ABC and CBS settlements actually illustrate this administration's concerted effort to silence its critics however possible. The underlying facts of neither case are indicative of media partisanship, and despite your claims to the contrary, context matters.

Meanwhile, the Dominion v. Fox News defamation trial actually exposed the exact sort of corruption you mention. While consistently, and continually claiming on-air that Biden stole the 2020 election, pundits including Sean Hannity, Tucker Carlson and Jesse Whatever (among others) acknowledged in emails that they knew such claims were patently false.

They knew Trump's stolen election claims were complete bullsh!t, and constantly mocked him in emails to each other, while unashamedly lying to the American public every night.

I do agree that individual investigative journalists are almost universally left leaning, but they have no incentive to lie in the manner you claim. Not only are the legal teams at CNN, NYT et al. extremely cautious, their owners certainly aren't left leaning.

Finally, the American public seems to be much more centrist than left leaning, with at least 30-40% are firmly on the right. Given those demographics, why would any media outlet act against its own interests in the manner you claim?

 

Wow you are clueless.  Enjoy your wokester kool aid there skippy 

[JimmySpeaks]

39 minutes ago, whaletail said:

You're like an

Fox News has been America's dominant political media presence for two decades. And they have been much more aggressively partisan than their supposed left wing peers, MSNBC included. The number of ex-Fox News employees in Trump's current administration is unprecedented, and I'm not even sure whether Hegseth is the most ridiculous example.

No wonder the dipshit can't even begin to do his job (his unsecured text chats during the Iran missile strike being the most egregious)

Regarding the examples of "MSM corruption" cited in this thread, only the 60 Minutes edit is even suggestive of left wing media partisanship, and I haven't watched that video yet. I'll comment on it more definitively this afternoon.

As mentioned previously, the ABC and CBS settlements actually illustrate this administration's concerted effort to silence its critics however possible. The underlying facts of neither case are indicative of media partisanship, and despite your claims to the contrary, context matters.

Meanwhile, the Dominion v. Fox News defamation trial actually exposed the exact sort of corruption you mention. While consistently, and continually claiming on-air that Biden stole the 2020 election, pundits including Sean Hannity, Tucker Carlson and Jesse Whatever (among others) acknowledged in emails that they knew such claims were patently false.

They knew Trump's stolen election claims were complete bullsh!t, and constantly mocked him in emails to each other, while unashamedly lying to the American public every night.

I do agree that individual investigative journalists are almost universally left leaning, but they have no incentive to lie in the manner you claim. Not only are the legal teams at CNN, NYT et al. extremely cautious, their owners certainly aren't left leaning.

Finally, the American public seems to be much more centrist than left leaning, with at least 30-40% are firmly on the right. Given those demographics, why would any media outlet act against its own interests in the manner you claim?

 

The MSM and its hatred for Trump cause them to lie for their agenda.  You just so choose to ignore it. 

[Bigbrog]

18 hours ago, uncle bernard said:

YOU DIDN'T!!! You and Caveira shared smug posts asking how it is possible the child could appear starving, but the mother isn't. I gave you the basic answer and now you're trying to act like you knew all along lmao.

LOL...thanks for once again showing your "intelligence"...please point to ANY post I made discussing the picture or made any comment about it. 

[uncle bernard]

13 hours ago, El Luchador said:

So his constant references to Nazis is a simple coincidence? And stating we would be making excuses for them has nothing to do with us being Nazi sympathizers?  How foolish of me to make such an observation. Although I don't think his constant references to Nazis is just a coincidence.

You wouldn't have to ask those questions if you were able to read.

[uncle bernard]

14 hours ago, JimmySpeaks said:

It’s funny how UB supports Hamas over Israel as Hamas wants the same result for Jews as the Nazis did.  He’s the biggest Nazi on here. 

If you can find one post on this entire forum where I say Hamas is good, I will give you $1000.

[JimmySpeaks]

1 minute ago, uncle bernard said:

If you can find one post on this entire forum where I say Hamas is good, I will give you $1000.

You may want to read my statement AGAIN.  I said you support Hamas over Israel which is a fact. 

Edited 1 hour ago by JimmySpeaks

[uncle bernard]

7 minutes ago, Bigbrog said:

LOL...thanks for once again showing your "intelligence"...please point to ANY post I made discussing the picture or made any comment about it. 

You called Caveira's post asking how it's possible for a child to starve before an adult logical, thus showing your support for his position. 

You could end this now by just admitting you were wrong about biology.

[uncle bernard]

Just now, JimmySpeaks said:

You may want to read my statement AGAIN.  I said you support Hamas over Israel. 

Find one post where I say that and you can have a $1000.

I explicitly say the way to *defeat Hamas* is to have a peace process. It's one of the foundational tenets of my position that I've said over and over again on this forum.

Happy hunting for your $1000!

[JimmySpeaks]

2 minutes ago, uncle bernard said:

Find one post where I say that and you can have a $1000.

I explicitly say the way to *defeat Hamas* is to have a peace process. It's one of the foundational tenets of my position that I've said over and over again on this forum.

Happy hunting for your $1000!

You said you think Israel should surrender.   Thats supporting Hamas over Israel.  Pay up. 

Edited 1 hour ago by JimmySpeaks

[JimmySpeaks]

18 hours ago, uncle bernard said:

I agree. Israel should surrender.

Pay up.  

[Bigbrog]

3 minutes ago, uncle bernard said:

You called Caveira's post asking how it's possible for a child to starve before an adult logical, thus showing your support for his position. 

You could end this now by just admitting you were wrong about biology.

  Again, showing your true "intelligence"

I called Caveria's post??  Like on the phone?  Is that possible??  

I assume you are talking about his post that I commented on which all I was doing was showing support for his logical line of thinking and why he came to the position he did because you resorted to childish name calling...period.  And never once did I said anything about biology (which is what my degree is in) other than calling you out for TRYING to sound smart by making the most obvious statement that children starve faster than adults...and went on to repeat it over and over to people