Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

If you had to name a number in reference to howmany senior medals we get, knowing you counterpart was going to say over or under, constituting their bet, what number are you saying?

I'm saying 4. My thought process being no one would take the over, 4 is a tie, and I'd beat anyone who took the under. 

I could have just said "howmany medals" but i find this scenario is a little more immersive and gets more thought into it. 

"Half measures are a coward's form of insanity."

Posted

When you assert that people would not go over four and you would win if they didn't: are you judging it from a bottom up or a top down perspective.  I.e. are you saying that based on the brackets they have and what each wrestlers path to medaling would be? Or more or an overall evaluation of the quality of the team and an expectation based on that?

Posted

Typically you would say 3.5 or 4.5, not 4.

"I know actually nothing.  It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me

 

 

Posted
8 minutes ago, reversaloffortune said:

For freestyle mens right? Set the number at 4.5 and I will take the under.

well the idea is to set a difficult number. 

"Half measures are a coward's form of insanity."

Posted
1 hour ago, flyingcement said:

When you assert that people would not go over four and you would win if they didn't: are you judging it from a bottom up or a top down perspective.  I.e. are you saying that based on the brackets they have and what each wrestlers path to medaling would be? Or more or an overall evaluation of the quality of the team and an expectation based on that?

I'm talking about us making predictions now, thats what you're asking right?

"Half measures are a coward's form of insanity."

Posted
2 minutes ago, Hammerlock3 said:

I'm talking about us making predictions now, thats what you're asking right?

I’m asking what’s underlying your guess of 4 — is it more bottom-up, meaning you’re looking at the brackets and the specific matchups each wrestler faces? Or is it more top-down, meaning you’re evaluating overall team quality and setting expectations from that?

I ask because I don’t know much about a lot of the international wrestlers, so I can’t make an accurate prediction myself. If your approach is bottom-up, I’d know I should dig into the brackets and specific matchups. If it’s top-down, I’d focus more on the overall roster quality.

Posted
17 minutes ago, flyingcement said:

I’m asking what’s underlying your guess of 4 — is it more bottom-up, meaning you’re looking at the brackets and the specific matchups each wrestler faces? Or is it more top-down, meaning you’re evaluating overall team quality and setting expectations from that?

I ask because I don’t know much about a lot of the international wrestlers, so I can’t make an accurate prediction myself. If your approach is bottom-up, I’d know I should dig into the brackets and specific matchups. If it’s top-down, I’d focus more on the overall roster quality.

top down!

  • Bob 1

"Half measures are a coward's form of insanity."

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...