Putin Plays Trump Like Fiddle

[GreatWhiteNorth]

6 hours ago, mspart said:

You said it was impossible for Biden.   Wow Donald Duck must be better than Biden and DD is not even real and can't talk and be understood.   In that, he and Biden share the same traits.   

mspart

How dare you!

Donald Duck is quite real. Speaks just fine for a duck. And is not that hard to understand.

I get that you're politically supercharged... but ripping on Donald Duck is over the line. Too far.

[Caveira]

6 hours ago, GreatWhiteNorth said:

How dare you!

Donald Duck is quite real. Speaks just fine for a duck. And is not that hard to understand.

I get that you're politically supercharged... but ripping on Donald Duck is over the line. Too far.

No one answered why Trump closed the boarder.   Biden said he couldn’t without new laws and how the duck is better than both 

[Tripnsweep]

21 hours ago, El Luchador said:

He probably mirrored San Fran Nan's trades. She is really smart. Every year she has been in office she has outperform the market and every major investment firm. I often tink she should be head of Trump's economic advisory board. Hunter should head energy.  He's so good he is on boards in Europe. 

To be fair, her husband is probably the one who actually does it, and he is the one with the bulk of their wealth. So a smart, savvy investor who is a billionaire being able to consistently outperform the market isn't that surprising. I doubt Nancy really does much investing herself. 

[Gene Mills Fan]

8 minutes ago, Tripnsweep said:

To be fair, her husband is probably the one who actually does it, and he is the one with the bulk of their wealth. So a smart, savvy investor who is a billionaire being able to consistently outperform the market isn't that surprising. I doubt Nancy really does much investing herself. 

She just tells him about new laws and regulations that are coming that no one else will know for weeks when it becomes public.

[Tripnsweep]

7 minutes ago, Gene Mills Fan said:

She just tells him about new laws and regulations that are coming that no one else will know for weeks when it becomes public.

Possibly, but I don't think that somebody who became a billionaire by making smart investments is going to need a lot of help. By now they're both into their 70's or 80's so I would cast even more doubt that either of them really do much themselves. 

Dr. Michael Burry consistently outperformed the market and still does to some degree. Maybe you should ask him. 

[El Luchador]

30 minutes ago, Tripnsweep said:

To be fair, her husband is probably the one who actually does it, and he is the one with the bulk of their wealth. So a smart, savvy investor who is a billionaire being able to consistently outperform the market isn't that surprising. I doubt Nancy really does much investing herself. 

So a novice investor outperforming every single professional organization every year is simply due to her husband's higher level of trading intelligence. Funny that he didn't have that level of success before her political career. 

All that land he bought that ended up being bought up by the government under eminent domain was a real stroke of luck. That was some real genius, but the risk was insane. 

Saying the Pelosis are just savy doesn't hold up with minimal scrutiny. 

Edited 2 hours ago by El Luchador

[El Luchador]

2024 Performance: According to the New York Post, her investment portfolio returned an estimated 54%, more than doubling the S&P 500's 25% gain in the same period and outperforming every large hedge fund, according to Bloomberg's end-of-year tally. Other sources, like YouTube clips analyzing Pelosi's trading activity, claim the growth was even higher, at 70% for 2024.

2023 Performance: Statistics from Unusual Whales indicate that Pelosi's portfolio returned 65% in 2023, significantly outperforming the S&P 500 index during the same period.

Decade-Long Growth: Pelosi's portfolio has reportedly returned over 700% in a decade, since 2014, according to data platform Quiver Quantitative. 

 

A little AI summary 

[red viking]

4 minutes ago, El Luchador said:

2024 Performance: According to the New York Post, her investment portfolio returned an estimated 54%, more than doubling the S&P 500's 25% gain in the same period and outperforming every large hedge fund, according to Bloomberg's end-of-year tally. Other sources, like YouTube clips analyzing Pelosi's trading activity, claim the growth was even higher, at 70% for 2024.

2023 Performance: Statistics from Unusual Whales indicate that Pelosi's portfolio returned 65% in 2023, significantly outperforming the S&P 500 index during the same period.

Decade-Long Growth: Pelosi's portfolio has reportedly returned over 700% in a decade, since 2014, according to data platform Quiver Quantitative. 

 

A little AI summary 

Trump's TOTAL net worth has increased about 50% in 6 months due to his bribery activities (e.g. foreign countries buying his meme coin, etc). How do you feel about that? Not a problem, right? You'd rather complain about much less powerful people. 

Edited 2 hours ago by red viking

[El Luchador]

2 minutes ago, red viking said:

Trump's TOTAL net worth has increased about 50% in 6 months due to his bribery activities (e.g. foreign countries buying his meme coin, etc). How do you feel about that? Not a problem, right? You'd rather complain about much less powerful people. 

One is breaking the law the other isn't.  With the left trying to destroy him financially I don't mind him fighting back. He sat back and took it first time around. Most of what is happening is people are showing their support for him.

[El Luchador]

21 minutes ago, Tripnsweep said:

Possibly, but I don't think that somebody who became a billionaire by making smart investments is going to need a lot of help. By now they're both into their 70's or 80's so I would cast even more doubt that either of them really do much themselves. 

Dr. Michael Burry consistently outperformed the market and still does to some degree. Maybe you should ask him. 

Paul isn't just a genius on the market, he is a genius with real estate. 

[red viking]

13 minutes ago, El Luchador said:

One is breaking the law the other isn't.  With the left trying to destroy him financially I don't mind him fighting back. He sat back and took it first time around. Most of what is happening is people are showing their support for him.

Wow. Mass bribery right out in the open and you're fine with that. The hypocrisy of the right goes to new levels every day. Unreal. 

[red viking]

18 minutes ago, El Luchador said:

One is breaking the law the other isn't.  With the left trying to destroy him financially I don't mind him fighting back. He sat back and took it first time around. Most of what is happening is people are showing their support for him.

Using the position of President to accept bribes is MUCH more harmful to American citizens (and corrupt) than engaging in insider trading. This is truly mind boggling. 

[El Luchador]

28 minutes ago, red viking said:

Using the position of President to accept bribes is MUCH more harmful to American citizens (and corrupt) than engaging in insider trading. This is truly mind boggling. 

Selling meme coin isn't accepting a bribe and the and the Trump Corporation in Donald Trump himself are two different entities

[El Luchador]

35 minutes ago, red viking said:

Wow. Mass bribery right out in the open and you're fine with that. The hypocrisy of the right goes to new levels every day. Unreal. 

I don't have a problem with him telling the left to f off after they tried to destroy him. 

[red viking]

1 minute ago, El Luchador said:

Selling meme coin isn't accepting a bribe and the and the Trump Corporation in Donald Trump himself are two different entities

So it's bribery if they give $ to Donald Trump, but NOT bribery if they give it to the Trump Corporation. Seriously? 

You can't make this type of thinking up. Unreal. 

[El Luchador]

Just now, red viking said:

So it's bribery if they give $ to Donald Trump, but NOT bribery if they give it to the Trump Corporation. Seriously? 

You can't make this type of thinking up. Unreal. 

You are one diligent straw man Builder

[red viking]

1 minute ago, El Luchador said:

I don't have a problem with him telling the left to f off after they tried to destroy him. 

Hopefully the next President takes it to another level. What goes around comes around and I'll support it 110% because of reptiles like you. 

Payback is coming. LET'S GO!!! 

[Caveira]

35 minutes ago, red viking said:

Using the position of President to accept bribes is MUCH more harmful to American citizens (and corrupt) than engaging in insider trading. This is truly mind boggling. 

How much money did burisma give to Hunter and how much of that did he kick up to the big guy?

[El Luchador]

4 minutes ago, red viking said:

Hopefully the next President takes it to another level. What goes around comes around and I'll support it 110% because of reptiles like you. 

Payback is coming. LET'S GO!!! 

I don't know how you can say that when both the bidens and Obama never did s*** in the public sector and are some of the richest people in America. And don't get me started on the clintons. You already don't have a leg to stand on when it comes to corruption in government for personal benefit

Edited 1 hour ago by El Luchador

[Wrestleknownothing]

1 hour ago, El Luchador said:

2024 Performance: According to the New York Post, her investment portfolio returned an estimated 54%, more than doubling the S&P 500's 25% gain in the same period and outperforming every large hedge fund, according to Bloomberg's end-of-year tally. Other sources, like YouTube clips analyzing Pelosi's trading activity, claim the growth was even higher, at 70% for 2024.

2023 Performance: Statistics from Unusual Whales indicate that Pelosi's portfolio returned 65% in 2023, significantly outperforming the S&P 500 index during the same period.

Decade-Long Growth: Pelosi's portfolio has reportedly returned over 700% in a decade, since 2014, according to data platform Quiver Quantitative. 

 

A little AI summary 

Let's take a look at Quiver Analytics.

They say her portfolio has returned 745% since 5/16/14, while the S&P was up 242% in the same time period.

They also have a graph of her net worth. In May 2014 it was $121.59. Now it is $256.72 for a return of 111%.

So which is it? 745% or 111%? Beating the index by 503%? Or missing the market by 131%?

The use of AI to get these answers is the least intelligent thing you can do.

[JimmySpeaks]

Russia says it’s a redline and Ukraine Can’t join NATO. Trump says hold my beer.  We’ll give you Article 5 protection instead.  Brilliant move. 

[red viking]

Trump says he won't rule out troops. Then Alpha Male Putin orders him to take that back. Now he rules out troops 24 hours later. 

 

[JimmySpeaks]

There will be Americans there garnering all those precious metals we’re getting in the art of the deal.