Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
28 minutes ago, Caveira said:

Find me one human that doesn’t want the Epstein files released on this board.   I’ll save you some time.  You won’t. 

I did not say there were any. As a matter of fact it is what everyone, save one person, wants. So that one person needs to generate daily distractions. Stay distracted. 

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted
2 hours ago, WrestlingRasta said:

 What does it say that violent crime, property crime, and failure to appear rates are down in Cook County in the year that the state of Illinois (these are not city initiatives but rather state legislation) enacted this system.

They are not down by a lot, but if they're down they can't be up....which goes against what certain media, talking heads, and politicians would have us believe. 

Crime is down because they are not charging, and under charging. 

During COVID-19 courts had Zoom hearings and many kept those in place and they have greatly reduced the failures to appear. Many wouldn't show because they had a warrant and knew if they appeared they'd be arrested.

Posted
29 minutes ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

I did not say there were any. As a matter of fact it is what everyone, save one person, wants. So that one person needs to generate daily distractions. Stay distracted. 

People have such a difficult time accepting they’ve backed or believed a lie that they will either deflect, or lie to themselves, to compensate. 

  • Fire 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

Will they share the results the day after they share the Epstein Files?

You mean the Epstein Files that Biden had for four years and couldn’t find anything in them that would be damaging to Trump?  I don’t know anything about them.  

Posted

Hmmmm, I don’t remember Garland ever claiming they were sitting on his desk waiting for his review.  But I do remember more recently Bondi, before having them on her desk waiting for her review, stating she needed to get them from the District Attorney’s office, (not from the previous Attorney General). 
 

I do realize however some people will choose not to remember that.  That whole ‘derangement syndrome’ thing… 

  • Bob 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

Hmmmm, I don’t remember Garland ever claiming they were sitting on his desk waiting for his review.  But I do remember more recently Bondi, before having them on her desk waiting for her review, stating she needed to get them from the District Attorney’s office, (not from the previous Attorney General). 
 

I do realize however some people will choose not to remember that.  That whole ‘derangement syndrome’ thing… 

Your memory seems okay, it’s thinking that’s not your forte. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Offthemat said:

Your memory seems okay, it’s thinking that’s not your forte. 

Yes, you are definitely the superintendent of clear thinking. Your herd knows no better sheep. 

Posted
28 minutes ago, Offthemat said:

You mean the Epstein Files that Biden had for four years and couldn’t find anything in them that would be damaging to Trump?  I don’t know anything about them.  

Yes, the same ones that Trump made a point of saying would be released as part of his campaign promises. The same ones Biondi said are sitting on her desk. The same ones Kash Patel said had a list of clients that later made his eyes bug out so horribly. The same ones that Elon Musk said contained Donald Trump's name. The same ones Trump has worked so hard, and so successfully, to distract you from. Yes, those.

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted
3 minutes ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

Yes, the same ones that Trump made a point of saying would be released as part of his campaign promises. The same ones Biondi said are sitting on her desk. The same ones Kash Patel said had a list of clients that later made his eyes bug out so horribly. The same ones that Elon Musk said contained Donald Trump's name. The same ones Trump has worked so hard, and so successfully, to distract you from. Yes, those.

Yeah well, my advice to you is just keep the faith. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Gene Mills Fan said:

Dershowitz said there is no client list. I think he would have used one in court if there was one. He said some judges should have released everything (the whatever files) years ago.

Brad Edwards, the victims lawyer,  going after Epstein for 20 years says this:

Edwards said he is bound by attorney-client privilege and cannot ethically reveal the names of any of Epstein's alleged associates without permission from his clients. But he said he has seen no indication that Epstein kept a list of those men

"Did Jeffrey write the names of these people down? I've never seen that. I only know of certain of these individuals because of representing clients," Edwards said

 

"That's just not something that he was keeping," Edwards said. "And it would be highly, highly unlikely that Jeffrey Epstein would keep a list of the people that he sent these women to.

"I've never seen a list of people that Jeffrey Epstein kept 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...