Don't Vote

[Undefeated]

1 minute ago, Caveira said:

Please rate each one 

That scale’s way too kind. They’re somewhere between "clown" and "super clown". But to keep it short, just consider them all clowns. You're not really looking for my rating - you’ve already got a response locked and loaded no matter what I say. So go ahead.

[Caveira]

10 minutes ago, Undefeated said:

That scale’s way too kind. They’re somewhere between "clown" and "super clown". But to keep it short, just consider them all clowns. You're not really looking for my rating - you’ve already got a response locked and loaded no matter what I say. So go ahead.

It’s 3:50 am in Iran and you’ve been posting for the past 7:8 ish hours.  It’s likely the you are character you are playing is a facade and you live in the continental United States.

Edited Tuesday at 12:29 AM by Caveira

[Undefeated]

14 minutes ago, red viking said:

This country has become garbage. I'm embarrassed that I served in the military. 

[Caveira]

16 minutes ago, Undefeated said:

That scale’s way too kind. They’re somewhere between "clown" and "super clown". But to keep it short, just consider them all clowns. You're not really looking for my rating - you’ve already got a response locked and loaded no matter what I say. So go ahead.

Had AI analyze your speech patterns.  Here is what it thinks.   In short.   Hello Mr western liberal.   Enjoy your day.

Based on the tone and content of the speech you provided, it is highly unlikely that the speaker is Iranian—and here’s why:

---

Tone and Style

• The language ("Jimmy and Mimmy", casual sarcasm, references to Trump and Biden, Chomsky as a voter) strongly suggests American or Western cultural context.

• Iranian political discourse is rarely that casual or humorous in public speech. Iranian critics typically couch their anti‑election rhetoric in ideological, moral, and global context rather than referencing U.S. politicians by nickname.

Content Focus

• The speaker’s critique is centered on U.S. electoral politics, specifically the narrative that elections are a spectacle controlled by the wealthy and media, with Biden and Trump as key figures.

• Iranian public commentary typically centers on Iran’s own electoral system and institutions—Supreme Leader, Guardian Council, voter boycotts, low turnout, etc. 

• While Iranian activists often call their elections symbolic or controlled, they typically use more formal or ideological language when criticizing. 

Who Might Be Speaking?

• The speaker seems to echo Western liberal or radical critics of American electoral democracy (e.g., leftist/Marxist commentators, social media skeptics).

• Mentioning dissent thinkers like Noam Chomsky and John Searle, plus referencing a “tactical vote” for Biden, fits a U.S. context—not Iranian.

---

In Summary

• Nationality? Almost certainly not Iranian.

• Likely origin? A Western, English‑speaking speaker—most probable American.

• Reasoning: Casual referencing of U.S. politics, American cultural idioms, and a rhetorical framework tied to U.S. elections.

---

Additional Notes on Iranian Election Critiques

• In Iran, elections are widely viewed as symbolic—controlled by unelected bodies like the Guardian Council and dominated by the Supreme Leader. Real power lies outside the ballot box. 

• Public disillusionment often gets expressed in terms of boycotts, low turnout, or reformist vs. principlist politics—but not typically using pop culture names or American political figures. 

---

Conclusion:
No, the speech does not sound Iranian—it fits a Western, likely American perspective. The content and vernacular are tied firmly to American politics and cultural context, rather than Iranian electoral discourse.

[JimmySpeaks]

17 minutes ago, Caveira said:

It’s 3:50 am in Iran and you’ve been posting for the past 7:8 ish hours.  It’s likely the you are character you are playing is a facade and you live in the continental United States.

This  

[JimmySpeaks]

33 minutes ago, red viking said:

This country has become garbage. I'm embarrassed that I served in the military. 

Most here are embarrassed you served.  If you really did. 

[JimmySpeaks]

5 minutes ago, Caveira said:

Had AI analyze your speech patterns.  Here is what it thinks.   In short.   Hello Mr western liberal.   Enjoy your day.

 

Based on the tone and content of the speech you provided, it is highly unlikely that the speaker is Iranian—and here’s why:

---

Tone and Style

• The language ("Jimmy and Mimmy", casual sarcasm, references to Trump and Biden, Chomsky as a voter) strongly suggests American or Western cultural context.

• Iranian political discourse is rarely that casual or humorous in public speech. Iranian critics typically couch their anti‑election rhetoric in ideological, moral, and global context rather than referencing U.S. politicians by nickname.

Content Focus

• The speaker’s critique is centered on U.S. electoral politics, specifically the narrative that elections are a spectacle controlled by the wealthy and media, with Biden and Trump as key figures.

• Iranian public commentary typically centers on Iran’s own electoral system and institutions—Supreme Leader, Guardian Council, voter boycotts, low turnout, etc. 

• While Iranian activists often call their elections symbolic or controlled, they typically use more formal or ideological language when criticizing. 

Who Might Be Speaking?

• The speaker seems to echo Western liberal or radical critics of American electoral democracy (e.g., leftist/Marxist commentators, social media skeptics).

• Mentioning dissent thinkers like Noam Chomsky and John Searle, plus referencing a “tactical vote” for Biden, fits a U.S. context—not Iranian.

---

In Summary

• Nationality? Almost certainly not Iranian.

• Likely origin? A Western, English‑speaking speaker—most probable American.

• Reasoning: Casual referencing of U.S. politics, American cultural idioms, and a rhetorical framework tied to U.S. elections.

---

Additional Notes on Iranian Election Critiques

• In Iran, elections are widely viewed as symbolic—controlled by unelected bodies like the Guardian Council and dominated by the Supreme Leader. Real power lies outside the ballot box. 

• Public disillusionment often gets expressed in terms of boycotts, low turnout, or reformist vs. principlist politics—but not typically using pop culture names or American political figures. 

---

Conclusion:
No, the speech does not sound Iranian—it fits a Western, likely American perspective. The content and vernacular are tied firmly to American politics and cultural context, rather than Iranian electoral discourse.

I pegged him early on.  P. H. O. N. Y. 

[JimmySpeaks]

He blocked me like slip n tweet. Because I own them both. 

[JimmySpeaks]

It’s funny how that 152 pansy disappeared and then this clown showed up. 

[Undefeated]

18 minutes ago, Caveira said:

Had AI analyze your speech patterns.  Here is what it thinks.   In short.   Hello Mr western liberal.   Enjoy your day.

 

Based on the tone and content of the speech you provided, it is highly unlikely that the speaker is Iranian—and here’s why:

---

Tone and Style

• The language ("Jimmy and Mimmy", casual sarcasm, references to Trump and Biden, Chomsky as a voter) strongly suggests American or Western cultural context.

• Iranian political discourse is rarely that casual or humorous in public speech. Iranian critics typically couch their anti‑election rhetoric in ideological, moral, and global context rather than referencing U.S. politicians by nickname.

Content Focus

• The speaker’s critique is centered on U.S. electoral politics, specifically the narrative that elections are a spectacle controlled by the wealthy and media, with Biden and Trump as key figures.

• Iranian public commentary typically centers on Iran’s own electoral system and institutions—Supreme Leader, Guardian Council, voter boycotts, low turnout, etc. 

• While Iranian activists often call their elections symbolic or controlled, they typically use more formal or ideological language when criticizing. 

Who Might Be Speaking?

• The speaker seems to echo Western liberal or radical critics of American electoral democracy (e.g., leftist/Marxist commentators, social media skeptics).

• Mentioning dissent thinkers like Noam Chomsky and John Searle, plus referencing a “tactical vote” for Biden, fits a U.S. context—not Iranian.

---

In Summary

• Nationality? Almost certainly not Iranian.

• Likely origin? A Western, English‑speaking speaker—most probable American.

• Reasoning: Casual referencing of U.S. politics, American cultural idioms, and a rhetorical framework tied to U.S. elections.

---

Additional Notes on Iranian Election Critiques

• In Iran, elections are widely viewed as symbolic—controlled by unelected bodies like the Guardian Council and dominated by the Supreme Leader. Real power lies outside the ballot box. 

• Public disillusionment often gets expressed in terms of boycotts, low turnout, or reformist vs. principlist politics—but not typically using pop culture names or American political figures. 

---

Conclusion:
No, the speech does not sound Iranian—it fits a Western, likely American perspective. The content and vernacular are tied firmly to American politics and cultural context, rather than Iranian electoral discourse.

[JimmySpeaks]

12 hours ago, Undefeated said:

P. H. O. N. Y. 

[Interviewed_at_Weehawken]

15 hours ago, Caveira said:

Had AI analyze your speech patterns.  Here is what it thinks.   In short.   Hello Mr western liberal.   Enjoy your day.

 

Based on the tone and content of the speech you provided, it is highly unlikely that the speaker is Iranian—and here’s why:

---

Tone and Style

• The language ("Jimmy and Mimmy", casual sarcasm, references to Trump and Biden, Chomsky as a voter) strongly suggests American or Western cultural context.

• Iranian political discourse is rarely that casual or humorous in public speech. Iranian critics typically couch their anti‑election rhetoric in ideological, moral, and global context rather than referencing U.S. politicians by nickname.

Content Focus

• The speaker’s critique is centered on U.S. electoral politics, specifically the narrative that elections are a spectacle controlled by the wealthy and media, with Biden and Trump as key figures.

• Iranian public commentary typically centers on Iran’s own electoral system and institutions—Supreme Leader, Guardian Council, voter boycotts, low turnout, etc. 

• While Iranian activists often call their elections symbolic or controlled, they typically use more formal or ideological language when criticizing. 

Who Might Be Speaking?

• The speaker seems to echo Western liberal or radical critics of American electoral democracy (e.g., leftist/Marxist commentators, social media skeptics).

• Mentioning dissent thinkers like Noam Chomsky and John Searle, plus referencing a “tactical vote” for Biden, fits a U.S. context—not Iranian.

---

In Summary

• Nationality? Almost certainly not Iranian.

• Likely origin? A Western, English‑speaking speaker—most probable American.

• Reasoning: Casual referencing of U.S. politics, American cultural idioms, and a rhetorical framework tied to U.S. elections.

---

Additional Notes on Iranian Election Critiques

• In Iran, elections are widely viewed as symbolic—controlled by unelected bodies like the Guardian Council and dominated by the Supreme Leader. Real power lies outside the ballot box. 

• Public disillusionment often gets expressed in terms of boycotts, low turnout, or reformist vs. principlist politics—but not typically using pop culture names or American political figures. 

---

Conclusion:
No, the speech does not sound Iranian—it fits a Western, likely American perspective. The content and vernacular are tied firmly to American politics and cultural context, rather than Iranian electoral discourse.

"Defeated"

[jross]

Following @Undefeated across topics provides a stronger indicator that he is an educated Iranian.

[jross]

It is your duty to vote.

Do not let the "worst" option win by default

[Undefeated]

2 hours ago, jross said:

Following @Undefeated across topics provides a stronger indicator that he is an educated Iranian.

Honestly, one of the perks of hanging around this forum is that in just a week, I’ve somehow been granted citizenship in at least five different countries.

Some unnamed African nation where, apparently, flushing toilets still haven’t caught on.

Saudi Arabia, where our women are fully veiled and banned from driving.

Afghanistan, where stoning women is still a thing.

Nigeria, where I’ve apparently been trading goats for wives.

And now I’ve been relocated to a blue city in a blue state in the good ol’ USA.

Still scratching my head on that one - how a guy who’s against voting in broken systems ended up in liberal-town USA.

The only downside: They wouldn’t let me bring my goat wives with me to America.

[red viking]

19 minutes ago, Undefeated said:

Honestly, one of the perks of hanging around this forum is that in just a week, I’ve somehow been granted citizenship in at least five different countries.

Some unnamed African nation where, apparently, flushing toilets still haven’t caught on.

Saudi Arabia, where our women are fully veiled and banned from driving.

Afghanistan, where stoning women is still a thing.

Nigeria, where I’ve apparently been trading goats for wives.

And now I’ve been relocated to a blue city in a blue state in the good ol’ USA.

Still scratching my head on that one - how a guy who’s against voting in broken systems ended up in liberal-town USA.

The only downside: They wouldn’t let me bring my goat wives with me to America.

The stuff you'll read on here is truly unbelievable. I just look at it as entertainment and try to hope that the idiocy isn't truly representative of the average American, or even people in the wrestling community. 

[JimmySpeaks]

10 minutes ago, red viking said:

The stuff you'll read on here is truly unbelievable. I just look at it as entertainment and try to hope that the idiocy isn't truly representative of the average American, or even people in the wrestling community. 

The libtardos on here are definitely representative of the average wokester trying to bring communism to America. 

[JimmySpeaks]

33 minutes ago, Undefeated said:

Honestly, one of the perks of hanging around this forum is that in just a week, I’ve somehow been granted citizenship in at least five different countries.

Some unnamed African nation where, apparently, flushing toilets still haven’t caught on.

Saudi Arabia, where our women are fully veiled and banned from driving.

Afghanistan, where stoning women is still a thing.

Nigeria, where I’ve apparently been trading goats for wives.

And now I’ve been relocated to a blue city in a blue state in the good ol’ USA.

Still scratching my head on that one - how a guy who’s against voting in broken systems ended up in liberal-town USA.

The only downside: They wouldn’t let me bring my goat wives with me to America.

You’re one of 200,000,000 that would love to live the American dream.   Nice. 

[Undefeated]

4 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

You’re one of 200,000,000 that would love to live the American dream.   Nice. 

Wait a sec - you were 100% sure I was a Democrat living in a blue state and not paying taxes just a few posts ago.

And now you’re saying I wish I lived in America?  Man, pick a narrative and stick to it.

I was honestly looking forward to finally seeing Tom Waits in person now that I apparently live in the U.S., but looks like y’all just deported me back to the Middle East.

Tough luck. Guess I’ll start planning my audience with Khamenei instead.

[Caveira]

9 minutes ago, Undefeated said:

Wait a sec - you were 100% sure I was a Democrat living in a blue state and not paying taxes just a few posts ago.

And now you’re saying I wish I lived in America?  Man, pick a narrative and stick to it.

I was honestly looking forward to finally seeing Tom Waits in person now that I apparently live in the U.S., but looks like y’all just deported me back to the Middle East.

Tough luck. Guess I’ll start planning my audience with Khamenei instead.

It’s approximately 11:30 pm in Iran.  Help me understand why you show up around midnight every day and post until 4:5:6am.  Assuming you live in Iran.  

[Undefeated]

17 minutes ago, Caveira said:

It’s approximately 11:30 pm in Iran.  Help me understand why you show up around midnight every day and post until 4:5:6am.  Assuming you live in Iran.  

Because sleep is for people who believe elections work.

[Caveira]

15 minutes ago, Undefeated said:

Because sleep is for people who believe elections work.

Seems rational 

[mspart]

Elections do work in a working democracy or republic.   They don't work so well in a dictatorship. 

Case in point.   Biden said the border situation could not be fixed without legislation.   A bill was introduced that would codify the then current border situation.   The people rejected the notion.   They voted for Trump over Harris and this issue was a large part of that.   Within 6 months, there is basically zero people crossing the border with no legislation having been passed.   Just enforcing law that was current for Biden as well as Trump.   We have two outcomes.   The voters had their say and got what they wanted in that scenario. 

mspart

[JimmySpeaks]

28 minutes ago, Undefeated said:

Because sleep is for people who believe elections work.

Elections work as well as those arranged marriages huh? 

[JimmySpeaks]

47 minutes ago, Caveira said:

It’s approximately 11:30 pm in Iran.  Help me understand why you show up around midnight every day and post until 4:5:6am.  Assuming you live in Iran.  

He works the night shift.