Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, mspart said:

https://www.outkick.com/sports/switzerland-womens-national-soccer-team-u15-boys-team

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-14845321/Alisha-Lehmann-Switzerland-Euros.html

There's definitively no male advantage is sports.   This is incredible and embarrassing.   I remember the US womens team got beat in similar circumstances.   

mspart

 

 

Who said men don't have an advantage in most sports? 

Another strawman. 

Edited by red viking
Posted
4 minutes ago, Gene Mills Fan said:

So maybe testosterone levels and chromosomes should be checked?

I asked a simple question. 

You raise separate issue because that requires resources and goes after pvt info for some people. Not happening at most levels. 

Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Gene Mills Fan said:

how about we start with world championships and the Olympics then move down?

Sure. Whatever. If the olympic committee wants to do that. 

Why do wingers constantly deflect the subject when asked to defend a ridiculous statement? 

Edited by red viking
Posted

post: boys can beat women

RV: everyone knows boys can beat women

Me: why don't we scientifically check to make sure boys aren't competing against women

RV: that's separate issue we can't afford to see if boys are competing against women

Me: how about at important stuff like the Olympics?

RV: your deflecting

  • Bob 1
Posted
Just now, Scouts Honor said:

lol, says the deflector who defends people who deny men have an advantage

 

saying.. .who said that.. 

LOL 

such an unserious person

For the 3rd time, who said men don't have an advantage in most sports? Otherwise mspart is knocking down a strawman. 

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Gene Mills Fan said:

post: boys can beat women

RV: everyone knows boys can beat women

Me: why don't we scientifically check to make sure boys aren't competing against women

RV: that's separate issue we can't afford to see if boys are competing against women

Me: how about at important stuff like the Olympics?

RV: your deflecting

100% different questions. If you can't see that, you are lost. 

Determining the extent of an issue vs determing what if anything  to do about it. Very simple. Wingers love to mix these up. The most classic example is w climate change. 

Edited by red viking
Posted
Just now, red viking said:

Who said otherwise? I'm asking for the 5th time now. Question for all wingers!!

I never said anyone said otherwise.  I just posted a fact.  Are you disputing this fact?  Why. 

Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

I never said anyone said otherwise.  I just posted a fact.  Are you disputing this fact?  Why. 

Lmao. Why waste time arguing something nobody disagrees with anyway? That's just dumb.

 

Edited by red viking
Posted
Just now, red viking said:

Lmao. Why state something if nobody disagrees with it? 

Sky is blue!!!

 

I’m glad you agree that males that transition to females shouldn’t be competing against biological females.  You’ve never agreed with that before. 

Posted
Just now, JimmySpeaks said:

Btw how do you know that NOBODY DISAGREES with it?   

Well, if none of the wingers can find anybody that does...it's probably pretty close to 0.0000% then. 

 

Posted
Just now, red viking said:

Well, if none of the wingers can find anybody that does...it's probably pretty close to 0.0000% then. 

 

Probably.  Nice proof.   And again im glad you finally admitted it. 

Posted
Just now, JimmySpeaks said:

Probably.  Nice proof.   And again im glad you finally admitted it. 

Please find somebody. Otherwise you're wasting ur time. It's like me making claim that sky is blue. Just pure stupidity. 

Posted
1 minute ago, red viking said:

Please find somebody. Otherwise you're wasting ur time. It's like me making claim that sky is blue. Just pure stupidity. 

Anyone could jump on here a disagree.  I posted a fact just in case.  Again thanks for reading and agreeing. 

Posted
Just now, JimmySpeaks said:

Anyone could jump on here a disagree.  I posted a fact just in case.  Again thanks for reading and agreeing. 

...just in case, lmao.

Im hereby claiming sky is blue, just in case.... 

Posted
23 minutes ago, red viking said:

Well, if none of the wingers can find anybody that does...it's probably pretty close to 0.0000% then. 

 

go to the college forum and find the thread about 

'with all this trans stuff going on...

or something to that effect

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...