Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, 1032004 said:

The only reason any significant # of people are seeing what that guy wrote are because of conservatives sharing it, not people that agree with him.  Seems a bit counter-intuitive, no?  He may be “running,” but he had 0% chance of winning even before his comments.

Thanks for confirming your hypocrisy though, caring so much about what that nobody says while pointing out that Charlie Kirk is a “good listen” and seemingly having no issue that he equated Mamdani with 9/11.

How convenient that you left out of my quote "whether or not you agree with what he says".

Whatever makes you feel better dude, have a nice day. 

Posted
57 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

How convenient that you left out of my quote "whether or not you agree with what he says".

Whatever makes you feel better dude, have a nice day. 

It’s not just “disagreeing with what he says.”  Equating Mamdani with 9/11 is abhorrent.  Nobody should “agree” with that.

Posted
10 hours ago, 1032004 said:

I think you’re asking questions to the wrong poster.  @Scouts Honor is the one that said he had “many things” to presumably prove he has something against Judaism, you should probably be demanding the proof from him.

Wrong.  You “claimed” he has nothing against Judaism because he said so.  This is the same guy that lied on his college application 

Posted
5 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

No he didn’t 

Did he check black? 
is he black? 
 

And yes I read his cover story.  Don’t believe him at all.  There are options listed and you check the correct ones on the list.  Pretty simple 

Posted
1 minute ago, JimmySpeaks said:

Did he check black? 
 

No, he did not.  He checked African American.  The screenshot you’re seeing is not the form he filled out.

Posted
2 hours ago, WrestlingRasta said:

Dude, you asked a question, and then got all hell bent with the answers you got, still trying to stretch out the bickering, by ‘equating’ what BigBrog says on a wrestling board participated in by about ten people with a dude running for a elected office, saying he on Twitter he wants to see people shooting ICE agents dead…..ironically or not ironically a few days before a group of ICE agents were ambushed.  You keep bringing up his only 500 followers. Ever heard of “word of mouth”? Ever heard of this new cool social media feature where posts can be shared?   Do you think BigBrog’s comment here is being shared by his big group of followers on social media?
 

And actually, I said you should care about city council.  You then rephrased your “rhetorical question”, and I said yes we should be concerned when people call for LEO to be shot dead because of the influence social media posts can have.  It is a general statement. You put quote around the guy’s name, even though I have never once mentioned his name.  
 

This isn’t going for you the way you hope it’s going for you.  Just stop.

Or don’t.  Up to you. 

Literally anybody can run for public office. He's a random college student who filled out a form to run. He is far, far, far less significant than Charlie Kirk. My goodness, man.

Also, he posted this after the ICE agents were ambushed, so you can relax in your hysterical attempt to hypothetically blame him for that attack.

Posted
10 hours ago, Scouts Honor said:

does he support palestine?

if so, he is against the jews.

Literally one of the dumbest statements I've ever heard (even though you have plenty of company w other wingers). 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, uncle bernard said:

Literally anybody can run for public office. He's a random college student who filled out a form to run. He is far, far, far less significant than Charlie Kirk. My goodness, man.

Also, he posted this after the ICE agents were ambushed, so you can relax in your hysterical attempt to hypothetically blame him for that attack.

You gotta go through multiple threads to carry on the same conversation day after day?  Sheez.  I will respond to the responses you have on this and the other thread, and then consider it enough said on my end.  If you feel the need to get the last word, or carry on day after day, thread after thread, you are welcome to.

The first thing I will respond to here is your insistence that the number of followers from the commentators is the bigger concern than the comments made.  Regardless how many followers, it only takes one, or a handful, as we have seen time and time and time again.  If you think stating that "24 years ago NYC was attacked by Muslims, and now a Muslim socialist is a candidate for mayor of NYC" (that's what Kirk said) is worse than stating "I want to see a few ICE agents dead, don't let me down" (what Guana said),  and then try to focus on number of followers to brush it aside.....you may want to do a little self inventory.

As for the date of the ambush and the "hypthetical blame"....there is no hypothetical blame about it.  My post clearly said 'ironically or not ironically' because we do not know if there was any influence.  Secondly, I had my attacks mixed up, and for that I will own, it was an attack on a border patrol station, also in Texas, that took place the day Guana posted that.  That's my bad.  The other thing I will own is that I got you and 1032004 mixed up (can't imagine why).  It was you that asked a question you apparently didn't want to hear the answers to, not them.  Again, that is my bad.  

Edited by WrestlingRasta
Posted
1 hour ago, WrestlingRasta said:

If you think stating that "24 years ago NYC was attacked by Muslims, and now a Muslim socialist is a candidate for mayor of NYC" (that's what Kirk said) is worse than stating "I want to see a few ICE agents dead, don't let me down" (what Guana said),  and then try to focus on number of followers to brush it aside.....you may want to do a little self inventory.

 

Obviously just looking at the statements saying you want ICE statements dead is worse.  But cumulatively, yes I do think telling 5 million people to draw comparisons of the likely NYC mayor to 9/11, is worse than telling 500 people you want ICE agents dead.   Like you said, it only takes one Islamaphobic New Yorker that could be inspired by Kirk’s rhetoric to want to kill Mamdani.

Posted
1 hour ago, 1032004 said:

Obviously just looking at the statements saying you want ICE statements dead is worse.  But cumulatively, yes I do think telling 5 million people to draw comparisons of the likely NYC mayor to 9/11, is worse than telling 500 people you want ICE agents dead.   Like you said, it only takes one Islamaphobic New Yorker that could be inspired by Kirk’s rhetoric to want to kill Mamdani.

Last time I checked there are violent masked protestors intervening with ice arrests. 

Posted
12 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

Last time I checked there are violent masked protestors intervening with ice arrests. 

And you think they were influenced by some kid running for city council but has no shot?

Posted
5 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

Only takes one.  Your words. 

Actually they weren’t my words originally.  But the chances are higher of getting that one when your audience is 5 million vs 5 hundred 

Posted
1 minute ago, 1032004 said:

Actually they weren’t my words originally.  But the chances are higher of getting that one when your audience is 5 million vs 5 hundred 

So you’re assuming “x”  followers is their entire audience.  Not to mention the tifa boys and girls are trained/paid anarchists 

Posted
3 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Actually they weren’t my words originally.  But the chances are higher of getting that one when your audience is 5 million vs 5 hundred 

You’re still trying to hide from your claim that Mamdani is Asian/African American 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...