Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Scouts Honor said:

is there another way this could be interpreted... something that would say that he actually supports judaism?

 

Did you link the wrong post?  Nothing about Judaism here

Posted
Just now, Scouts Honor said:

brad lander wants to keep illegals here... so you know what you can do with that

He’s the highest ranking Jewish government official in NYC.  And he supports Mamdani

Posted
8 minutes ago, Scouts Honor said:

you still haven't googled taqiyya

later.

im going to bed.

 

lol.  Do you also think the Texas flood was caused by cloud seeding?

Posted
20 hours ago, Bigbrog said:

Guess I have never heard Charlie say anything about his religion but guess if you say that the has...and I have no idea who Laura Loomer is

Not to be argumentative on this one, but Charlie Kirk talks about his religion all the time.  His faith is very much at the foundation of his beliefs and he’s not at all shy about it.  He’s a pretty good listen, whether you agree with all he says or not.  

Posted
1 minute ago, WrestlingRasta said:

Not to be argumentative on this one, but Charlie Kirk talks about his religion all the time.  His faith is very much at the foundation of his beliefs and he’s not at all shy about it.  He’s a pretty good listen, whether you agree with all he says or not.  

By “his” I think @Bigbrog is referring to Mamdani.  Kirk equated Mamdani being a Muslim with 9/11. Gross. And he has over 5 million x followers.  Way more than the 477 of “Matt Guana.”

Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

Ahhhh.  In that case my bad. 

Do you “care” that he equated Mamdani with 9/11? You said we should care about what “Matt Guana” says.

Edited by 1032004
Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Do you “care” that he equated Mamdani with 9/11? You said we should care about what “Matt Guana” says.

Dude, you asked a question, and then got all hell bent with the answers you got, still trying to stretch out the bickering, by ‘equating’ what BigBrog says on a wrestling board participated in by about ten people with a dude running for a elected office, saying he on Twitter he wants to see people shooting ICE agents dead…..ironically or not ironically a few days before a group of ICE agents were ambushed.  You keep bringing up his only 500 followers. Ever heard of “word of mouth”? Ever heard of this new cool social media feature where posts can be shared?   Do you think BigBrog’s comment here is being shared by his big group of followers on social media?
 

And actually, I said you should care about city council.  You then rephrased your “rhetorical question”, and I said yes we should be concerned when people call for LEO to be shot dead because of the influence social media posts can have.  It is a general statement. You put quote around the guy’s name, even though I have never once mentioned his name.  
 

This isn’t going for you the way you hope it’s going for you.  Just stop.

Or don’t.  Up to you. 

Edited by WrestlingRasta
Posted
26 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

Dude, you asked a question, and then got all hell bent with the answers you got, still trying to stretch out the bickering, by ‘equating’ what BigBrog says on a wrestling board participated in by about ten people with a dude running for a elected office, saying he on Twitter he wants to see people shooting ICE agents dead…..ironically or not ironically a few days before a group of ICE agents were ambushed.  You keep bringing up his only 500 followers. Ever heard of “word of mouth”? Ever heard of this new cool social media feature where posts can be shared?   Do you think BigBrog’s comment here is being shared by his big group of followers on social media?
 

And actually, I said you should care about city council.  You then rephrased your “rhetorical question”, and I said yes we should be concerned when people call for LEO to be shot dead because of the influence social media posts can have.  It is a general statement. You put quote around the guy’s name, even though I have never once mentioned his name.  
 

This isn’t going for you the way you hope it’s going for you.  Just stop.

Or don’t.  Up to you. 

The only reason any significant # of people are seeing what that guy wrote are because of conservatives sharing it, not people that agree with him.  Seems a bit counter-intuitive, no?  He may be “running,” but he had 0% chance of winning even before his comments.

Thanks for confirming your hypocrisy though, caring so much about what that nobody says while pointing out that Charlie Kirk is a “good listen” and seemingly having no issue that he equated Mamdani with 9/11.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...