White Conservatives are the biggest threat

[Scouts Honor]

well... almost half right 

 

[Scouts Honor]

 

[El Luchador]

Libs have never found a death toll to high to not justify their humanitarian agenda. 

[scourge165]

4 minutes ago, El Luchador said:

Libs have never found a death toll to high to not justify their humanitarian agenda. 

Timmothy McVeigh would like to have a word. 

As would these Gentlemen;

Charleston Church Shooting (2015): Dylann Roof murdered nine African American worshippers at the Emanuel AME Church in South Carolina. He was motivated by white supremacist beliefs and aimed to incite a race war. 

Pittsburgh Synagogue Shooting (2018): Robert Bowers killed 11 people at the Tree of Life synagogue in Pennsylvania, marking the deadliest attack on the Jewish community in U.S. history. He was driven by antisemitic and white nationalist ideologies. 

El Paso Walmart Shooting (2019): A gunman killed 23 people, targeting Hispanic individuals. He cited fears of a "Hispanic invasion" and was influenced by white nationalist rhetoric.

Buffalo Supermarket Shooting (2022): An 18-year-old white supremacist killed 10 Black individuals at a supermarket. He was motivated by the "Great Replacement" conspiracy theory, which falsely claims that white populations are being replaced by minorities.

 

 

The OP conflates "Biggest" with "only." 

[El Luchador]

Pol Pot 2 million. You want to play this game?

[scourge165]

1 minute ago, El Luchador said:

Pol Pot 2 million. You want to play this game?

Why...on Earth would I want to talk about a Cambodian leaders when talking about DOMESTIC terrorism?

I didn't actually remark on your education despite your claim that I had, but...it's easy to see why people have. Jesus Dude... 

'Err....you want to play this game. Ghengis Khan!'

LOL...WTF?

[Scouts Honor]

1 hour ago, El Luchador said:

Libs have never found a death toll to high to not justify their humanitarian agenda. 

 

[Scouts Honor]

1 hour ago, scourge165 said:

Why...on Earth would I want to talk about a Cambodian leaders when talking about DOMESTIC terrorism?

I didn't actually remark on your education despite your claim that I had, but...it's easy to see why people have. Jesus Dude... 

'Err....you want to play this game. Ghengis Khan!'

LOL...WTF?

communists are communists

[El Luchador]

1 hour ago, scourge165 said:

Why...on Earth would I want to talk about a Cambodian leaders when talking about DOMESTIC terrorism?

I didn't actually remark on your education despite your claim that I had, but...it's easy to see why people have. Jesus Dude... 

'Err....you want to play this game. Ghengis Khan!'

LOL...WTF?

What were his political views? Did he kill more than Lenin or Mao? 

[Tripnsweep]

Apparently the suspect was a white guy.

Edit: Apparently they posted the wrong picture of somebody being arrested. So I got that wrong. Oh well. Hey at least I can admit it, unlike a certain president. 

Edited June 2 by Tripnsweep

[scourge165]

2 hours ago, El Luchador said:

What were his political views? Did he kill more than Lenin or Mao? 

...what a truly moronic game. 

Topic- Biggest threat of domestic terrorism

Answer- The dead guy from Cambodia! 

 

This would be akin to me bringing up Hitler for the Far Right given his Ultranationalism and Ethnocentrism... which is a pretty stupid argument, but at least closer to the mark as there are more Neo-Nazi or White Supremacists than there are people who support...Pol Pot. 

The level of stupidity to bring up a dead Cambodian when talking about domestic terrorism is...truly Jimmy-esque. 

 

This isn't even a debatable topic. The overwhelming majority of terrorist attacks, plots and deaths are committed by white nationalists. Bringing up Pol Pot tells me you both don't understand the topic and you feel some...bizarre need to defend those people...which is odd. 

[Tripnsweep]

Should have read the fine print. 

[scourge165]

8 minutes ago, Tripnsweep said:

Apparently the suspect was a white guy.

Edit: Apparently they posted the wrong picture of somebody being arrested. So I got that wrong. Oh well. Hey at least I can admit it, unlike a certain president. 

I don't even know why this thread was started other than there are people sick enough to almost rejoice when someone else does something horrible. 

It should be noted though for the morons who are citing historical characters when talking about "Left" and "Right" in the context of domestic threats, Hamas is a "Right-Wing" organization rooted in Religious fundamentalism. 

 

Now I'd never attribute those beliefs to anyone on here, but if you're dumb enough to cite Pol Pot, I suppose you'd have to equally accept Hamas and the like as being on "the right." 

None of that changes this was a truly moronic thread and El Luchador took it to levels of stupidity I didn't know possible. 

[scourge165]

4 minutes ago, Tripnsweep said:

Should have read the fine print. 

I'm honestly not even sure why people care what race the person was. 

I don't celebrate when I see the guy who shot a bunch of black people who offered prayer and comfort to a sick young kid were then murdered by someone with EXTREME and screwed up political principles. 

But the people who get defensive about it, the people who think it somehow represents them...they're kinda telling on themselves. 

[El Luchador]

5 hours ago, scourge165 said:

...what a truly moronic game. 

Topic- Biggest threat of domestic terrorism

Answer- The dead guy from Cambodia! 

 

This would be akin to me bringing up Hitler for the Far Right given his Ultranationalism and Ethnocentrism... which is a pretty stupid argument, but at least closer to the mark as there are more Neo-Nazi or White Supremacists than there are people who support...Pol Pot. 

The level of stupidity to bring up a dead Cambodian when talking about domestic terrorism is...truly Jimmy-esque. 

 

This isn't even a debatable topic. The overwhelming majority of terrorist attacks, plots and deaths are committed by white nationalists. Bringing up Pol Pot tells me you both don't understand the topic and you feel some...bizarre need to defend those people...which is odd. 

Hitler was an authoritarian Socialist, clearly left leaning.  So you got that wrong too.

[1032004]

13 hours ago, Scouts Honor said:

well... almost half right 

 

Obviously a horrible attack, but there were no casualties.  “Amuse” might be the biggest liar on xtwitter, I’d be careful what you share from him. 

[scourge165]

3 hours ago, El Luchador said:

Hitler was an authoritarian Socialist, clearly left leaning.  So you got that wrong too.

Good lord dude, I haven't said anything about your education, but THIS is evidence that it is SORELY lacking.

Hitler literally banned the communist and socialist parties.

I was...about 30% sure you'd be...ignorant enough to fall for the "National Socialist," or NAZI party which began as a pejorative toward the Party. 

You not only bastardized this thread about DOMESTIC TERRORISTS... brought up Pol Pot and then... have such a surface level understanding of Hitler that you think the guy who wanted to RID all of Germany of everyone who WASN'T pure German, the embodiment of a Authoritarian Nationalist...and are now trying to paint him as "left wing," is so...stupid. And I know that gets used too much, but My God...how far removed from reality can you be?

 

 

They banned UNIONS, they were about as far right as you can possibly get... but because you don't understand where the term NAZI came from. 

[JimmySpeaks]

8 hours ago, Tripnsweep said:

Apparently the suspect was a white guy.

Edit: Apparently they posted the wrong picture of somebody being arrested. So I got that wrong. Oh well. Hey at least I can admit it, unlike a certain president. 

Slip n tweet saw the video and pounced.  A guy with his hair dyed can do that.  Apparently 

[JimmySpeaks]

If you disarm the people like the Nazis did does that make you about as far left as you can get or actually as far left as you can get ??

[Scouts Honor]

9 hours ago, Tripnsweep said:

Apparently the suspect was a white guy.

Edit: Apparently they posted the wrong picture of somebody being arrested. So I got that wrong. Oh well. Hey at least I can admit it, unlike a certain president. 

buying the media bull i see

[Scouts Honor]

8 hours ago, scourge165 said:

 

 

This would be akin to me bringing up Hitler for the Far Right given his Ultranationalism and Ethnocentrism... which is a pretty stupid argument, but at least closer to the mark as there are more Neo-Nazi or White Supremacists than there are people who support...Pol Pot. 

 

trump is literally hitler!!

never heard this before

[Scouts Honor]

1 hour ago, 1032004 said:

Obviously a horrible attack, but there were no casualties.  “Amuse” might be the biggest liar on xtwitter, I’d be careful what you share from him. 

no casaulties?  having your jeans/pants burned into your legs... your skin melted..

how lovely

[JimmySpeaks]

4 minutes ago, Scouts Honor said:

no casaulties?  having your jeans/pants burned into your legs... your skin melted..

how lovely

No kidding.  8 people taken to the hospital, some with severe burns but hey, no casualties.  What a  

Edited June 2 by JimmySpeaks

[scourge165]

11 minutes ago, Scouts Honor said:

trump is literally hitler!!

never heard this before

Nobody even mentioned Trump there little guy. Stop yapping. 

 

If the conversation is too hard for you to follow(despite being the one to start it) just say that. 

[Scouts Honor]

2 minutes ago, scourge165 said:

Nobody even mentioned Trump there little guy. Stop yapping. 

 

If the conversation is too hard for you to follow(despite being the one to start it) just say that. 

wow you dont even remember mentioning hitler 

then fail to make the connection that trump has been called hitler for years..

while you worry about pol pot being brought into the convo