Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, ionel said:

How so? 

 

13 minutes ago, mspart said:

How so Rasta?   I'm interested in what you think on this one.   Not looking to argue, just why you think the above may be true.  What isn't adding up?

mspart

There’s a lot about the story that we are being told that doesn’t add up at all, a lot I’m not too much a fan of.  Much more than I’m interested in getting into all of it in here.  But I’ll zero in on the actions of three “security” personnel standing in the front of the crowd at the time of the shooting. Two with their back to Charlie and one facing Charlie.  Their actions immediately after the shot prove to me two things: 1) their actions were very much coordinated, planned, and very much in a hurry, and 2) their actions and their hurry was not at all to tend to Charlie or to chase any bad guy.   Just that in of itself, even if it was only this (although there is much more) is enough to tell me that the story we are being told is not the real story.  
 

There’s video of these three men. Plain as day.  I urge you to seek it out. And I’m not much of a conspiracy theorist. But this one stinks to high heaven. 

Edited by WrestlingRasta
Posted

So the murderers family lied about him admitting he did it?   Gee thanks mom and dad. 

  • Jagger 1

Its easy to be a non believer when you’re alive but it won’t be when you die. 

Posted
15 hours ago, WrestlingRasta said:

 

There’s a lot about the story that we are being told that doesn’t add up at all, a lot I’m not too much a fan of.  Much more than I’m interested in getting into all of it in here.  But I’ll zero in on the actions of three “security” personnel standing in the front of the crowd at the time of the shooting. Two with their back to Charlie and one facing Charlie.  Their actions immediately after the shot prove to me two things: 1) their actions were very much coordinated, planned, and very much in a hurry, and 2) their actions and their hurry was not at all to tend to Charlie or to chase any bad guy.   Just that in of itself, even if it was only this (although there is much more) is enough to tell me that the story we are being told is not the real story.  
 

There’s video of these three men. Plain as day.  I urge you to seek it out. And I’m not much of a conspiracy theorist. But this one stinks to high heaven. 

I wouldn’t be shocked if there was some funny business with Kirk’s murder, but if so I’d doubt his own security personnel were involved.

Even assuming it was Robinson, I specifically said “motivated by the left.”  I’m not convinced Robinson was actually a “leftist,” but gay/trans rights is certainly a left position if that was his motive.

Posted
16 hours ago, WrestlingRasta said:

 

There’s a lot about the story that we are being told that doesn’t add up at all, a lot I’m not too much a fan of.  Much more than I’m interested in getting into all of it in here.  But I’ll zero in on the actions of three “security” personnel standing in the front of the crowd at the time of the shooting. Two with their back to Charlie and one facing Charlie.  Their actions immediately after the shot prove to me two things: 1) their actions were very much coordinated, planned, and very much in a hurry, and 2) their actions and their hurry was not at all to tend to Charlie or to chase any bad guy.   Just that in of itself, even if it was only this (although there is much more) is enough to tell me that the story we are being told is not the real story.  
 

There’s video of these three men. Plain as day.  I urge you to seek it out. And I’m not much of a conspiracy theorist. But this one stinks to high heaven. 

There's also a few other things that stink and don't come off as authentic or tha makes sense..

1. It was said the shooter prior to getting on the roof assembled the rifle and was able to hit tha shot without sighting in the scope at all which is nuts (on a rifle said to be from WWII no less) then after the shot, was able to disassemble the rifle and climb down with it in his backpack. 
 

Then he reassembled the rifle after getting off the roof and wrapped it in a towel to be found near the crime scene where police were crawling all over... There was actually someone that was a hun expert on social media (I think Joe Rogan spoke about it) that went through the process of assembling and disassembling the rifle and how there is no way he would have been off the roof that quickly given his adrenaline rush after the shot.

Additionally, in the security footage where it was supposed to be in the backpack it was demonstrated a long part of the barrel would have been sticking out and would not fit.

2. If anyone has paid any attention to how Erika Kirk has been acting recently it's no in line with someone at all mourning the loss of a husband but I'll still give the benefit of the doubt to her as incredibly strange as it is with the way she's acting and going about life. Also she was in trumps beauty pageants in 2012 and was rumored to do casting for him/trump organization. 
 

3. Then you have all the random messages and writing on bullets which is just very strange and convenient along with the trans boyfriend text messages that don't sound typical at all of someone that age lining up with the messages on the casings... 

Also on Joe Rogan the guy that got initially in custody was some kind of agitator that as soon as the shot was fired the guy pulled his pants down and claimed he did it? I guess he was also at the Boston bombing and some other major event and no one was ever able to interview him because he was designated to be in possession of child porn? 

There is just a ton of weird stuff about this all around that makes no sense at all...

Posted
12 minutes ago, Doublehalf said:

There's also a few other things that stink and don't come off as authentic or tha makes sense..

1. It was said the shooter prior to getting on the roof assembled the rifle and was able to hit tha shot without sighting in the scope at all which is nuts (on a rifle said to be from WWII no less) then after the shot, was able to disassemble the rifle and climb down with it in his backpack. 

How do you know he didn't sight in the scope.  He had said prior that he had hit this distance on the range (or elsewhere) so sounds like it was sighted in.  

.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...