Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

What lie did I believe?

You make it sound like there are zero democrats that are pro life.  Automatically pawned off the No Kings flyers as nothing.  Why not wait until it comes out before ASSuming you know it all already? 

Posted
4 hours ago, Tripnsweep said:

The guy who they arrested who was apparently trying to kill him actually voted for Trump. 

Still waiting for you to show proof he actually voted for Trump.  Oh wait you cant. 

Posted
23 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

You make it sound like there are zero democrats that are pro life.  Automatically pawned off the No Kings flyers as nothing.  Why not wait until it comes out before ASSuming you know it all already? 

Well there were none on this guy’s list of names, apparently.

I didn’t “pawn off the No Kings flyers as nothing,” I pointed out that the other evidence is stronger.  There are multiple possible explanations for why he would have those flyers and not be a leftist.

Thanks for confirming I didn’t believe any lies!

  • Haha 1
Posted
31 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Well there were none on this guy’s list of names, apparently.

I didn’t “pawn off the No Kings flyers as nothing,” I pointed out that the other evidence is stronger.  There are multiple possible explanations for why he would have those flyers and not be a leftist.

Thanks for confirming I didn’t believe any lies!

You ignored the question about if a Democrat libtardo can be pro life. 

Posted
18 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

You ignored the question about if a Democrat libtardo can be pro life. 

Where did I say they couldn’t be?   Are you denying that being pro-life is generally a characteristic of the right?

Posted
1 hour ago, 1032004 said:

Where did I say they couldn’t be?   Are you denying that being pro-life is generally a characteristic of the right?

It's funny, I ALMOST only see his posts now through quotes, but "libtardo?" Yet he whines about mean words.

 

Yeah, he was a conservative, pro-life Trump supporter and he killed one of the Democrats ACTUALLY because they voted with a Republican(despite being planned for months)...and is a deep cover Democrat operative who is trying to make the right look bad!

 

Imagine the internet if Tomothy McVeigh did today what he did in...'94.  

Posted
7 hours ago, scourge165 said:

It's funny, I ALMOST only see his posts now through quotes, but "libtardo?" Yet he whines about mean words.

 

Yeah, he was a conservative, pro-life Trump supporter and he killed one of the Democrats ACTUALLY because they voted with a Republican(despite being planned for months)...and is a deep cover Democrat operative who is trying to make the right look bad!

 

Imagine the internet if Tomothy McVeigh did today what he did in...'94.  

People have really lost their minds. I even saw some people on X doubting Boelter was even pro life because “being pro life is inconsistent with being a murderer”
 

 

Posted (edited)
13 hours ago, scourge165 said:

So the delusional nut job on Youtube, that is a valid source, but the X post is not. I wonder why that is.

Also, being one of the most "non partisan" Governors is generally considered a good thing. It's often who the most popular ones are. 

Minnesota also ranks among the top 10 most pro-business states, but... that also seems irrelevant as does Tim Waltz in this thread. 


Just seems odd he voted for Trump, you knew why he did this a couple days ago, but now... you're just at a complete loss. 

The YouTube guy gave evidence for his position, didn't just make insults and statements. How do you not see that.

Edited by El Luchador
Posted
46 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Welp, I think this is the nail in the coffin for the “he was a leftist” argument.

 

 

Well law enforcement said that  his motives were unclear based on the evidence they have collected. Also said many claims of a hit list and manifesto are unsubstantiated. Like the video I posted says, it sounds more like what the left was calling a hit list was more of a contract list. 

Posted
39 minutes ago, headshuck said:

Just curious, why didn’t they just say he voted as a Republican? Did he vote Independent?

Supposedly the R party said it was “private.”  Not sure if the D party would know what he voted if he voted something other than D, but I presume they could check their own records to confirm he didn’t vote D.   I saw some info but not 100% of the accuracy that actually said there were zero D votes in the primary of his district.

Posted
36 minutes ago, El Luchador said:

Well law enforcement said that  his motives were unclear based on the evidence they have collected. Also said many claims of a hit list and manifesto are unsubstantiated. Like the video I posted says, it sounds more like what the left was calling a hit list was more of a contract list. 

I wasn’t speaking to his motives, just his background.  

What do you mean by a “contract list”?  Please don’t tell me you mean “contact” and you think all those people were his accomplices.

Law enforcement confirmed the list included names and addresses including of people that were attacked.  They didn’t specifically call it a “hit list,” but the implication there is pretty obvious.

Posted
15 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

I wasn’t speaking to his motives, just his background.  

What do you mean by a “contract list”?  Please don’t tell me you mean “contact” and you think all those people were his accomplices.

Law enforcement confirmed the list included names and addresses including of people that were attacked.  They didn’t specifically call it a “hit list,” but the implication there is pretty obvious.

Contact 

Posted
16 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

 

Law enforcement confirmed the list included names and addresses including of people that were attacked.  They didn’t specifically call it a “hit list,” but the implication there is pretty obvious.

There were 70 names. The press did promote it as a hit list, and you ran with it.

Posted
2 minutes ago, El Luchador said:

Contact 

Lolololol.

Law enforcement specifically stated he had to look up their addresses, it’s not like these are all his pen pals.

Good lord man, you are lost.

Posted
1 minute ago, El Luchador said:

There were 70 names. The press did promote it as a hit list, and you ran with it.

You know what also had 70 names?  The “board” he was on.  All Democrats according to you?

Posted
17 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

I wasn’t speaking to his motives, just his background.  

But you denied his background of direct involvement with an organization who provides resources for African immigrants and his appointment by Democrats. Thiose are not tertiary issues. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Lolololol.

Law enforcement specifically stated he had to look up their addresses, it’s not like these are all his pen pals.

Good lord man, you are lost.

Or it's a professional contact list. Are you that dense?

Posted
Just now, El Luchador said:

But you denied his background of direct involvement with an organization who provides resources for African immigrants and his appointment by Democrats. Thiose are not tertiary issues. 

I didn’t deny either of those things.

Although “direct involvement” with MAU is a stretch.  He spoke during one virtual session.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...