Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

Her statement comes after the DHS posted documents from 2021 indicating that she filed for a protective order claiming her husband punched and scratched her, ripped her shirt and left her bruised.
 

sounds like a crime to me?

 

what say you ChatGPT ?

 

Yes the described actions would likely constitute a crime in the United States. Specifically, they would fall under the category of domestic violence, which is illegal in every U.S. state.

Here’s a breakdown of potential charges:


1. Assault and Battery

  • Punching and scratching someone typically qualifies as assault (the threat or attempt of physical harm) and battery (the actual physical harm).

  • These can be charged as misdemeanors or felonies, depending on the severity and state laws.


2. Domestic Violence

  • Since this involves a spouse, it likely qualifies as domestic battery or domestic assault, which can carry enhanced penalties due to the relationship between the parties.


3. Destruction of Property

  • Ripping a shirt could be considered destruction of personal property, especially if it was done violently or intentionally as part of the altercation.


4. Resulting Injuries

  • Leaving someone bruised indicates physical harm, which strengthens the case for assault/battery charges and may also factor into protective order proceedings.


Even if charges weren’t filed at the time, statements like these in legal documents (like a protective order) can be the basis for investigation or later prosecution, especially if new evidence or reports emerge.

Would you like info on how different states treat domestic violence or how protective orders work?

  • Brain 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, Caveira said:

Her statement comes after the DHS posted documents from 2021 indicating that she filed for a protective order claiming her husband punched and scratched her, ripped her shirt and left her bruised.

So she is now admitting to perjury in order to gain release of her gangster husband.  Beautiful couple. 

Posted
44 minutes ago, Caveira said:

Her statement comes after the DHS posted documents from 2021 indicating that she filed for a protective order claiming her husband punched and scratched her, ripped her shirt and left her bruised.
 

sounds like a crime to me?

 

what say you ChatGPT ?

 

 

Yes the described actions would likely constitute a crime in the United States. Specifically, they would fall under the category of domestic violence, which is illegal in every U.S. state.

Here’s a breakdown of potential charges:


1. Assault and Battery

  • Punching and scratching someone typically qualifies as assault (the threat or attempt of physical harm) and battery (the actual physical harm).

  • These can be charged as misdemeanors or felonies, depending on the severity and state laws.


2. Domestic Violence

  • Since this involves a spouse, it likely qualifies as domestic battery or domestic assault, which can carry enhanced penalties due to the relationship between the parties.


3. Destruction of Property

  • Ripping a shirt could be considered destruction of personal property, especially if it was done violently or intentionally as part of the altercation.


4. Resulting Injuries

  • Leaving someone bruised indicates physical harm, which strengthens the case for assault/battery charges and may also factor into protective order proceedings.


Even if charges weren’t filed at the time, statements like these in legal documents (like a protective order) can be the basis for investigation or later prosecution, especially if new evidence or reports emerge.

Would you like info on how different states treat domestic violence or how protective orders work?

Maybe ask ChatGPT what it thinks of defying the Supreme  Court.

And ask it what it thinks of the head of the department of education not knowing what it is.

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted
7 minutes ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

Maybe ask ChatGPT what it thinks of defying the Supreme  Court.

And ask it what it thinks of the head of the department of education not knowing what it is.

The us gov can’t compel the pres of another country to return someone to the us.   So what is there to be done?   
 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, Caveira said:

The us gov can’t compel the pres of another country to return someone to the us.   So what is there to be done?   
 

 

Oh, yes it can. It does it all the time through its control of the world financial system.

That theater in the White House was orchestrated by Trump. The funniest punchline was when a guy who calls himself a charismatic dictator said he had no power to return him. And he did it with a straight face.

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted
1 minute ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

Oh, yes it can. It does it all the time through its control of the world financial system.

That theater in the White House was orchestrated by Trump. The funniest punchline was when a guy who calls himself a charismatic dictator said he had no power to return him. And he did it with a straight face.

Maybe we could invade?  

What do you think about the new articles published linking him to ms13?

Posted
6 minutes ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

Oh, yes it can. It does it all the time through its control of the world financial system.

That theater in the White House was orchestrated by Trump. The funniest punchline was when a guy who calls himself a charismatic dictator said he had no power to return him. And he did it with a straight face.

And knowing that we’re literally paying them to hold the prisoners 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Caveira said:

Maybe we could invade?  

What do you think about the new articles published linking him to ms13?

I wonder why Bondi blurred the name of the cop who filed the report.  Could it be because he was suspended less than one week after that report was filed for providing case information to a prostitute he was paying for sex?

Posted
1 minute ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

What article? Do you mean the screenshot of a headline from the ny post?

The whole link is right above it.   As with any story that gets politicized you sometimes have to wait for the real details to come out.  

  • Brain 1
Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, 1032004 said:

I wonder why Bondi blurred the name of the cop who filed the report.  Could it be because he was suspended less than one week after that report was filed for providing case information to a prostitute he was paying for sex?

Maybe they don’t want the left to find him and burn his house down?

crazy leftist protestors would never do anything silly like that right?

Edited by Caveira
  • Fire 1
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Caveira said:

Maybe they don’t want the left to find him and burn his house down?

crazy leftist protestors would never do anything silly like that right?

That’s cute if you believe that’s why

Edited by 1032004
Posted
3 minutes ago, Caveira said:

The whole link is right above it.   As with any story that gets politicized you sometimes have to wait for the real details to come out.  

Ok, the story says alledged. Many people have been accused of many things that turned out to be false. That the Trump Administration is now attempting to win in the court of public opinion when they canmot win in multiple courts of law means nothing to me. But it sure does to some people.

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted
5 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

I think he was referring to the governor of Pennsylvania.   The Jewish governor whose house was started on fire by a Trump hater.  

I just googled show me when far left liberals target and attack republican targets.  Or something like that.   

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...