Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
9 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

Why should he when Biden wouldn’t?   

You know, man, I have to say that it doesn't seem like you ACTUALLY care about the contents of that file, and that Donald Trump doesn't either and simply used the idea as a way to get people to vote for him.  So weird.

  • Haha 1

You are a voice of reason. - @Paul158

Posted
Just now, VakAttack said:

You know, man, I have to say that it doesn't seem like you ACTUALLY care about the contents of that file, and that Donald Trump doesn't either and simply used the idea as a way to get people to vote for him.  So weird.

Ya. That’s why people voted for him.  🤦‍♂️ cringe 

Posted
1 minute ago, JimmySpeaks said:

Ya. That’s why people voted for him.  🤦‍♂️ cringe 

Keep dodging, man.  And keep doing the "whataboutism" stuff.  Trump is president right now.  Right this second.

You are a voice of reason. - @Paul158

Posted
18 minutes ago, VakAttack said:

Keep dodging, man.  And keep doing the "whataboutism" stuff.  Trump is president right now.  Right this second.

So what?  He’s doing nothing different than the mush man did.  And we all know you’re all about what the mush man did. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

So what?  He’s doing nothing different than the mush man did.  And we all know you’re all about what the mush man did. 

So you don't care.  Ok.  You can just leave it at that, and that he used the promise of revealing something related to child sex offenses as a carrot to get certain people to vote for him.  If you're fine with that, that's certainly your prerogative.  Stop trying to make it about Biden, he never made any claims about the purported file and has nothing to do with Trumps decisions now.

  • Brain 1

You are a voice of reason. - @Paul158

Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, VakAttack said:

So you don't care.  Ok.  You can just leave it at that, and that he used the promise of revealing something related to child sex offenses as a carrot to get certain people to vote for him.  If you're fine with that, that's certainly your prerogative.  Stop trying to make it about Biden, he never made any claims about the purported file and has nothing to do with Trumps decisions now.

I care exactly the same as I have for the last four years. Can you show me the data that the “carrot” you’re referring to actually got people to vote for him?  Thanks. 

Edited by JimmySpeaks
Posted
14 minutes ago, VakAttack said:

Which is to say, none.  You don't care.

Still waiting for that evidence showing all the people that voted for him because of it.  Stop avoiding And prove it 

Posted
2 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

Still waiting for that evidence showing all the people that voted for him because of it.  Stop avoiding And prove it 

LOL.  I agree, move away from you not caring about this child sex abuse case and move to something less important.

  • Fire 1

You are a voice of reason. - @Paul158

Posted
3 hours ago, Paul158 said:

I was thinking back in November when Trump won. But more than likely they started right after Bidens debate with Trump.  They were already putting the stickers or labels on. They knew what was coming.

And again, this sounds like it's made up without a source. I also can't find any reference of it...or real point as the tariffs were very small going both ways.


This absolutely feels like something someone made up on Facebook, then people see it and they start saying, 'did you see what China is doing.'

But if anyone finds it, let me know. 

Posted
1 hour ago, JimmySpeaks said:

Why should he when Biden wouldn’t?   

Well Jimmy... because that is a BIG part of what he ran on and the whole Qanon stuff. 

The cabal of Democrats who sacrifice babies.

 

So...if there's truth to that, why WOULDN'T he fulfill his promise? Kinda feels like it was so important to him that he win so he DIDN'T have it released?

Kinda fits with why he tried to appoint the guy(Alex Acosta) who stepped in and gave Epstein a deal behind the backs of Prosecutors already working on the case, to Labor Secratary.

 

Alex Acosta’s decision to grant immunity to all "potential co-conspirators" in the 2008 plea deal with Jeffrey Epstein has been one of the most controversial aspects of the case. 

 

So a Federal Prosecutor steps in, grants this immunity(which was unprecedented)...gives Epstein a cupcake sentence and then Trump tries to put him in his cabinet. 

Posted
4 hours ago, Paul158 said:

I was thinking back in November when Trump won. But more than likely they started right after Bidens debate with Trump.  They were already putting the stickers or labels on. They knew what was coming.

Yes, it was caught shipping through Mexico to avoid the tariffs. 

  • Bob 1
Posted
2 hours ago, scourge165 said:

And again, this sounds like it's made up without a source. I also can't find any reference of it...or real point as the tariffs were very small going both ways.


This absolutely feels like something someone made up on Facebook, then people see it and they start saying, 'did you see what China is doing.'

But if anyone finds it, let me know. 

Rela. I'm just guessing on what China might have done with all the things they have done in the past. They seem to be very resourceful when it comes stealing intellectual property and subsidizing their companies in order increase exports. I wouldn't put it past them. 

Posted
3 hours ago, VakAttack said:

LOL.  I agree, move away from you not caring about this child sex abuse case and move to something less important.

Yep for over four years now. 

Posted
2 hours ago, scourge165 said:

Well Jimmy... because that is a BIG part of what he ran on and the whole Qanon stuff. 

The cabal of Democrats who sacrifice babies.

 

So...if there's truth to that, why WOULDN'T he fulfill his promise? Kinda feels like it was so important to him that he win so he DIDN'T have it released?

Kinda fits with why he tried to appoint the guy(Alex Acosta) who stepped in and gave Epstein a deal behind the backs of Prosecutors already working on the case, to Labor Secratary.

 

Alex Acosta’s decision to grant immunity to all "potential co-conspirators" in the 2008 plea deal with Jeffrey Epstein has been one of the most controversial aspects of the case. 

 

So a Federal Prosecutor steps in, grants this immunity(which was unprecedented)...gives Epstein a cupcake sentence and then Trump tries to put him in his cabinet. 

Big part.  Scrooge is funny  

the border was a big part, unlawful immigrants were a big part, wokeness was a big part 

this was nothing comparable 

Posted
Just now, VakAttack said:

I'm sorry that you haven't cared for over 4 years.

I gave up on Biden and figured after killary handled it nothing was ever going to come out 

Posted
21 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

I gave up on Biden and figured after killary handled it nothing was ever going to come out 

Whatever your reasons for not caring about child sexual abuse are your own.

You are a voice of reason. - @Paul158

Posted (edited)
21 minutes ago, VakAttack said:

Whatever your reasons for not caring about child sexual abuse are your own.

It’s interesting that you keep talking about it again and again and again.  Seems to be on your mind.  I’m guessing there’s a reason why you’re so interested in that topic. 

Edited by JimmySpeaks
Posted (edited)
18 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

It’s interesting that you keep talking about it again and again and again.  Seems to be on your mind.  I’m guessing there’s a reason why you’re so interested in that topic. 

You're right, I'm the weird one for caring about the victims of child sexual abuse.

Edited by VakAttack

You are a voice of reason. - @Paul158

Posted
14 minutes ago, VakAttack said:

You're right, I'm the weird one for caring about the victims of child sexual abuse.

All of a sudden huh?  You said nothing while it was happening daily with the border being wide open.  Must only matter to you when it involves rich people. 

Posted
31 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

All of a sudden huh?  You said nothing while it was happening daily with the border being wide open.  Must only matter to you when it involves rich people. 

Which, remind me, is better or worse than using them as political pieces and not caring about them at all, like yourself? 

You are a voice of reason. - @Paul158

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...