Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 minutes ago, jross said:

I am a forum member, not an admin.  I have not suspended anyone.  But if I was an admin, I'd implement guidelines. 

 

The current guidelines seem that you get suspended when Bob is annoyed.  Bob doesn't have time to police this free site all day.  Often both the content reporter and offender annoy Bob.  Husker seems have a higher annoyance threshold than Bob...

One allows free speech and one doesn’t.  Got it. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, jross said:

Jimmy, this place is better when the jackasses are the ones I don’t agree with. It’s not rocket science; stop being a dick.

How is asking questions about why someone on here gets suspended being a dick?  I have completely opposite views of the Minnesota snowplow driver but I don’t believe he should have been suspended 

Posted
35 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

How is asking questions about why someone on here gets suspended being a dick?  I have completely opposite views of the Minnesota snowplow driver but I don’t believe he should have been suspended 

What was your username when you formed this opinion of GWN?

  • Jagger 1

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted
29 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

You like questions you already know the answer to huh? 

How about one I don't know the answer to.

Now that Jaggers' mailbag has come to a close, where are you going to go to to whine like a baby when you inevitably get banned again?

  • Jagger 1

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

How about one I don't know the answer to.

Now that Jaggers' mailbag has come to a close, where are you going to go to to whine like a baby when you inevitably get banned again?

Who?  And Again, a suspension isn’t a ban. A ban means you’re not allowed back soooooooo  🤦‍♂️  I added 6 months on to the original 60 days and was too lazy to go find the password for the other one.  Of course I also canceled my rofkin subscription then too and bought a Flo one instead.  

Edited by JimmySpeaks
Posted
9 hours ago, JimmySpeaks said:

https://www.newsweek.com/russia-tariffs-trump-moex-2055779
 

 

 

Just because they’re not on the list YET.  

Yeah...they hit every market hard Jimmy.

 

Please read what you post and if you have something to add to it...actually do so. "Trade has dwindled." Great. It's significantly higher than what it is between many other Countries on the list as I'd JUST pointed out. Can you address that(just say no...or don't...honestly, I probably won't read it). 

Quote

The White House said that Russia had been omitted from the tariff list because sanctions had already dwindled trade between the countries.

 

Posted
8 hours ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

What was your username when you formed this opinion of GWN?

The way he writes and how unhinged he is, I'd bet money it's LBJ. It's the 6-7 posts responding to the same post with partially thought out sentences like he's in a rush to get it out there.

It's not the quantity, it's that he doesn't seem to actually care about what he's arguing about, he just wants to do it. 

 

 

I don't think there are a ton of things worth really arguing this strongly over. The potential economic ruin of the US is atop the list. Lets hope this is a more dramtic version of 2018. 

I don't believe it will be, but...lets hope. 

 

It WOULD be nice if any of this was being done legally and went through Congress(which would NOT pass these tariffs). But we've eliminated more guardrails. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, scourge165 said:

The way he writes and how unhinged he is, I'd bet money it's LBJ. It's the 6-7 posts responding to the same post with partially thought out sentences like he's in a rush to get it out there.

It's not the quantity, it's that he doesn't seem to actually care about what he's arguing about, he just wants to do it. 

 

 

I don't think there are a ton of things worth really arguing this strongly over. The potential economic ruin of the US is atop the list. Lets hope this is a more dramtic version of 2018. 

I don't believe it will be, but...lets hope. 

 

It WOULD be nice if any of this was being done legally and went through Congress(which would NOT pass these tariffs). But we've eliminated more guardrails. 

Try reading the thread. It’s in there SOMEWHERE.  Or just keep making stupid guesses I really don’t care 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Rankings

  • College Commitments

    James Lindsay

    Bishop Watterson, Ohio
    Class of 2026
    Committed to Army West Point
    Projected Weight: 157, 165

    Luke Geleta

    Phillipsburg, New Jersey
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Binghamton
    Projected Weight: 141, 149

    Ben Szuba

    Brick Memorial, New Jersey
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Arizona State
    Projected Weight: 285

    Alex Berisha

    Fox Lane, New York
    Class of 2025
    Committed to West Virginia
    Projected Weight: 285

    Graham Furtick

    Metrolina Christian, North Carolina
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Gardner-Webb
    Projected Weight: 157
×
×
  • Create New...