Jump to content

Seeding accuracy or more excitement?  

36 members have voted

  1. 1. Would you rather stick to the current system off seeding all 33 wrestlers, or go back to seeding only the top 16?

    • Seed all 33
      17
    • Seed top 16
      19


Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, Husker_Du said:

haha. i like the comparison to socialism.

however, there's a problem there. seeds are subjective and prone to manipulation.

how 'bout this....

a template based on conference placings. 

ultimate get-what-you-earn, know-your-destiny format

LET'S GO PAC-12!!!!!

  • Jagger 1

Sponsored by INTERMAT ⭐⭐⭐⭐

Posted
1 hour ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

You realize you are a nazi in that scenario, right?

That seems low considering my family came over from Germany ~200 years before there were Nazis.  🤨

.

Posted
Just now, Wrestleknownothing said:

Agreed. That reads way more harsh than I meant it to be. Apologies.

🙂 I know how you meant it and it wasn't intended harsh like that ... we are good no apologies necessary.   🙂

.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Rankings

  • College Commitments

    Lisa Pastoriza

    Wyoming Seminary, Arizona
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Tiffin (Women)
    Projected Weight: 103

    Nyvaeh Wendt

    Mason County Central, Michigan
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Siena Heights (Women)
    Projected Weight: 131

    Rhees Hatch

    Bear River, Utah
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Hastings (Women)
    Projected Weight: 160

    Giada Cucchiara

    Platte County, Missouri
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Baker (Women)
    Projected Weight: 138

    Sophia Marshall

    Rosewood, North Carolina
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Mount Olive (Women)
    Projected Weight: 207
×
×
  • Create New...