Jump to content

Seeding accuracy or more excitement?  

36 members have voted

  1. 1. Would you rather stick to the current system off seeding all 33 wrestlers, or go back to seeding only the top 16?

    • Seed all 33
      17
    • Seed top 16
      19


Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, Husker_Du said:

haha. i like the comparison to socialism.

however, there's a problem there. seeds are subjective and prone to manipulation.

how 'bout this....

a template based on conference placings. 

ultimate get-what-you-earn, know-your-destiny format

LET'S GO PAC-12!!!!!

  • Jagger 1

Sponsored by INTERMAT ⭐⭐⭐⭐

Posted
1 hour ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

You realize you are a nazi in that scenario, right?

That seems low considering my family came over from Germany ~200 years before there were Nazis.  🤨

.

Posted
6 hours ago, BruceyB said:

Being unseeded is like life circumstances. Some are born into a 17 seed, some are born a 33.

The rich get rich. The poor get children...

  • Bob 1

.

Posted
Just now, Wrestleknownothing said:

Agreed. That reads way more harsh than I meant it to be. Apologies.

🙂 I know how you meant it and it wasn't intended harsh like that ... we are good no apologies necessary.   🙂

.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...