Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm not downloading that app and it won't let me watch in the browser anymore so all of your links are useless on me.

I just find the actual question of if he will or won't follow through on the ban he supported before Jeff Yass gave him money and told him TikTok was good actually.

Posted
10 minutes ago, Danny Deck said:

I'm not downloading that app and it won't let me watch in the browser anymore so all of your links are useless on me.

I just find the actual question of if he will or won't follow through on the ban he supported before Jeff Yass gave him money and told him TikTok was good actually.

There is your answer.

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
3 minutes ago, Tripnsweep said:

Oh no. Where will you get your news from since you can't read beyond a 5th grade level. 

I left the tweet so you could read it.  At whatever grade level you read at.   At the risk of being redundant   The tweet is the thing just above the tik tok link.   It has words and a pic of one of your favorite politicians.   Some people call it x now.    

it seems the tok isn’t going anywhere.  

Posted
33 minutes ago, RockLobster said:

Don't celebrate too soon, my Chinese brother. This isn't anywhere close to over.

You must have interesting insider info.  Post all the juicy details.  

Posted
5 hours ago, Caveira said:

I left the tweet so you could read it.  At whatever grade level you read at.   At the risk of being redundant   The tweet is the thing just above the tik tok link.   It has words and a pic of one of your favorite politicians.   Some people call it x now.    

it seems the tok isn’t going anywhere.  

Oscar The Grouch GIF by Sesame Street

Posted
2 minutes ago, Caveira said:

You must have interesting insider info.  Post all the juicy details.  

Consider a puzzle for Christmas... just for you. Dig around the internet and you'll find it. You're welcome.

Posted
2 minutes ago, RockLobster said:

Consider a puzzle for Christmas... just for you. Dig around the internet and you'll find it. You're welcome.

I do puzzles every day.  Your turn.  Contribute.  Post what you know brother.  We all know you have the details.  

Posted
2 minutes ago, Caveira said:

I do puzzles every day.  Your turn.  Contribute.  Post what you know brother.  We all know you have the details.  

Keep going, my Chinese brother. Keep going. Your statement about TIkTok not going anywhere - you have yet to reveal the solution to that puzzle.

Or maybe you're just all talk. That seems more likely.

Your post follows mine by 2 minutes... C'mon bro. You're not even trying. This isn't a 2 minute puzzle.

Put some elbow grease into it. Check back with me in the next few days. This won't be easy.

Posted

I'm curious what "political means" he thinks are available to him to resolve this. The law mandating the sale passed with a veto proof majority on a bipartisan basis. Do we think the makeup of each house changed enough or that the Republicans remain scared enough of him to change their position? 

It seems to me his best bet to get the law off the books would be to hope the Supreme Court is receptive to the arguments the lower courts have not been. Otherwise, it's just kicking the can down the road on enforcement.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Looking like the Supreme Court will uphold the law. 

  • Arguing on behalf of TikTok: Noel Francisco, contended that the law burdens TikTok’s speech, so the First Amendment applies. The government “has no valid interest in preventing foreign propaganda” and cannot constitutionally try to keep Americans from being “persuaded by Chinese misinformation,” he said. That is targeting speech, which the First Amendment does not permit, he added.

  • Arguing on behalf of the government: Elizabeth B. Prelogar, the solicitor general, countered that the act does not violate the First Amendment. “All of the same speech that’s happening on TikTok could happen post-divestiture,” she said, adding, “All the act is doing is trying to surgically remove the ability of foreign adversary nation to get our data and to be able to exercise control over the platform.”

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2025/01/10/us/tiktok-ban-supreme-court

Posted
Looking like the Supreme Court will uphold the law. 
  • Arguing on behalf of TikTok: Noel Francisco, contended that the law burdens TikTok’s speech, so the First Amendment applies. The government “has no valid interest in preventing foreign propaganda” and cannot constitutionally try to keep Americans from being “persuaded by Chinese misinformation,” he said. That is targeting speech, which the First Amendment does not permit, he added.

  • Arguing on behalf of the government: Elizabeth B. Prelogar, the solicitor general, countered that the act does not violate the First Amendment. “All of the same speech that’s happening on TikTok could happen post-divestiture,” she said, adding, “All the act is doing is trying to surgically remove the ability of foreign adversary nation to get our data and to be able to exercise control over the platform.”

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2025/01/10/us/tiktok-ban-supreme-court


Noel Francisco is the former Solicitor General of the United States.

I can’t believe that he actually argued that the US doesn’t have a compelling argument to prevent the spread of Chinese propaganda (or the surveillance of US citizens by them).

I get that he’s in private practice now, but dude, come on.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
8 minutes ago, Le duke said:


Noel Francisco is the former Solicitor General of the United States.

I can’t believe that he actually argued that the US doesn’t have a compelling argument to prevent the spread of Chinese propaganda (or the surveillance of US citizens by them).

I get that he’s in private practice now, but dude, come on.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I would like to see said propaganda.  Where is it?

it’s twerking, chess, music, vids from us news outlets.    It’s basically instagram…. Facebook…. YouTube…. Or whatever.   

from said twerking videos, What specifically are the Chinese “surveilling”?

Posted
1 hour ago, WrestlingRasta said:

I can’t fathom why any grown half way intelligent folk would use tik tok.  I have three kids in that 18-24 year range and all three have even shed it since it shifted from funny lip sync videos. 

There are still dance vids on TikTok.   I watch chess vids food vids and other informative wrestling vids.  Here are two dance vids.  I think y’all will like the second one much better.  Let me know what you think 

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTYEQ86cN/

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTYEQdGT5/

Posted
12 hours ago, Caveira said:

There are still dance vids on TikTok.   I watch chess vids food vids and other informative wrestling vids.  Here are two dance vids.  I think y’all will like the second one much better.  Let me know what you think 

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTYEQ86cN/

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTYEQdGT5/

You're an idiot, again. And "I think y'all will like" here is the worst effort at click bait of all time.

China needs to replace you with another paid-for bit**.

Which is good, because your BS is so incredibly bad, that you really shouldn't be allowed here.

You contribute nothing.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Rankings

  • College Commitments

    Nadav Nafshi

    Germantown Academy, Pennsylvania
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Pitt
    Projected Weight: 165, 174

    Robert DeHaven

    Woodward Academy, Georgia
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Harvard
    Projected Weight: 165, 174

    Luke Kaiser

    Athens, Ohio
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Lake Erie
    Projected Weight: 165

    Eliana Callies

    Rochester Century, Minnesota
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Upper Iowa (Women)
    Projected Weight: 145

    Kylee Shoop

    West Delaware, Iowa
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Upper Iowa (Women)
    Projected Weight: 131
×
×
  • Create New...