Trump creates new "department" whose goal is efficiency and cutting down government waste

[Caveira]

2 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

So I’m confused.  Is today a day you ‘hate’ or love media???

You can refute the comment with a fact.  Or not.  Idk.   Are you debating a million dollars per truck is a valid expense for the American tax payer during crazy inflation and a pretty crap economy?   

[WrestlingRasta]

4 minutes ago, Caveira said:

You can refute the comment with a fact.  Or not.  Idk.   Are you debating a million dollars per truck is a valid expense for the American tax payer during crazy inflation and a pretty crap economy?   

No, I’m asking if today is a day you love, or hate, the media.  It gets confusing. You keep going back and forth depending on the story…

 

Besides, when your ‘source’ is Jesse Watters , there’s no need to refute.  It typically works itself out

Edited Sunday at 03:10 AM by WrestlingRasta

[Caveira]

1 minute ago, WrestlingRasta said:

No, I’m asking if today is a day you love, or hate, the media.  It gets confusing. You keep going back and forth depending on the story…

Today is my day of hatred for governmental waste in spending.    Did we spend too much on these electric mail trucks or not?   Did it help the “environment” and can president vegetable back that up?

[WrestlingRasta]

Just now, Caveira said:

Today is my day of hatred for governmental waste in spending.    Did we spend too much on these electric mail trucks or not?   Did it help the “environment” and can president vegetable back that up?

Relax, you’ll be okay. 

[Le duke]

The vid says 93.  The president can’t count to contract so prolly right there.  
 

Cool. The video is wrong. Which is easily verifiable with a simple “electric mail trucks contract” search in Google or any similar search engine.

Also, the original contract for the Grumman LLV was awarded during the Reagan administration to a plant in a swing state. Was that improper or illegal? Is every contract awarded to any company in a swing state improper? Do you understand how absurd that sounds?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Caveira]

Just now, Le duke said:

Cool. The video is wrong. Which is easily verifiable with a simple “electric mail trucks contract” search in Google or any similar search engine.

Also, the original contract for the Grumman LLV was awarded during the Reagan administration to a plant in a swing state. Was that improper or illegal? Is every contract awarded to any company in a swing state improper? Do you understand how absurd that sounds?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Awarding a gov contract to a defense contractor in a swing state as opposed to an actual Ev company like Tesla seems weird no?   

you didn’t answer if 1m per truck was a good price or not.  I mean it is my/yours/the American people’s money after all.  

[Le duke]

Awarding a gov contract to a defense contractor in a swing state as opposed to an actual Ev company like Tesla seems weird no?   
you didn’t answer if 1m per truck was a good price or not.  I mean it is my/yours/the American people’s money after all.  

Did Tesla bid on the work?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Caveira]

3 minutes ago, Le duke said:

Did Tesla bid on the work?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Dunno.  The current gov doesn’t like to work with successful companies with right leaning leaders  (My observation) You tell me. 
 

also tell me if 1m (your estimate) per truck is a valid expense on the American tax payer.    You haven’t answered that a few times in a row.  

[Le duke]

Dunno.  The current gov doesn’t like to work with successful companies with right leaning leaders  (My observation) You tell me. 
 
also tell me if 1m (your estimate) per truck is a valid expense on the American tax payer.    You haven’t answered that a few times in a row.  

The cost per truck would drop a lot, lot further. That’s what happens when you stand up any new manufacturing line: the first ones off the line cost a lot more than a couple years later.

The cost of the first batch of Arleigh Burke DDGs is higher than the current version. Same with F35s.

Hell, the first F-150s cost a hell of a lot of money for the first production run. After a couple hundred thousand it’s 1/10th that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[WrestlingRasta]

8 minutes ago, Caveira said:

Dunno.  The current gov doesn’t like to work with successful companies with right leaning leaders  (My observation) You tell me. 
 

also tell me if 1m (your estimate) per truck is a valid expense on the American tax payer.    You haven’t answered that a few times in a row.  

Do you get hard ons with tik tok over the massive over spending in every administration, or just the something something DS when your love for the media day is shown to be wrong? 

[Caveira]

1 minute ago, WrestlingRasta said:

Do you get hard ons with tik tok over the massive over spending in every administration, or just the something something DS when your love for the media day is shown to be wrong? 

I get hard ons for massive gov over spending.  I pay a lot of $$$$ in taxes every darn quarter.   Do you get hard ons for not exposing what the gov spends $ on…….  you generally won’t find it the mainstream media.   

[WrestlingRasta]

1 minute ago, Caveira said:

I get hard ons for massive gov over spending.  I pay a lot of $$$$ in taxes every darn quarter.   Do you get hard ons for not exposing what the gov spends $ on…….  you generally won’t find it the mainstream media.   

I don’t.  I get hard on for sexy women only. In both cases, it’s worked well for me. 

Edited Sunday at 03:44 AM by WrestlingRasta

[Caveira]

1 minute ago, WrestlingRasta said:

I don’t.  I get hard on for sexy women only. In both cases, it’s worked well for me. 

Keep giving your $ to Joe then.   Cool cool.    
 

you know you can do both right ?

[WrestlingRasta]

1 minute ago, Caveira said:

Keep giving your $ to Joe then.   Cool cool.    
 

you know you can do both right ?

Does that mean when the new president takes over, I don’t have to pay taxes anymore?  Since I’m giving my money to Joe? 
 

(You really should relax, you don’t seem well) 

[Caveira]

2 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

Does that mean when the new president takes over, I don’t have to pay taxes anymore?  Since I’m giving my money to Joe? 
 

(You really should relax, you don’t seem well) 

I hope so lol.   But no unfortunately.   Hopefully doge reduces the gov nonsense though.  I hope you’re behind that.  

[WrestlingRasta]

10 minutes ago, Caveira said:

I hope so lol.   But no unfortunately.   Hopefully doge reduces the gov nonsense though.  I hope you’re behind that.  

I don’t count chickens before they hatch.  

[Caveira]

1 minute ago, WrestlingRasta said:

I don’t count chickens before they hatch.  

You Don’t even count them after you’ve spent bazillions on a few mail trucks.  So when do you start counting?

[WrestlingRasta]

6 minutes ago, Caveira said:

You Don’t even count them after you’ve spent bazillions on a few mail trucks.  So when do you start counting?

A) I don’t have bazillions to spend on anything. My counting starts and stops here locally. 
 

2) You haven’t shown a credible number on any truck.  Maybe you should start there.  It may get in the way of your something something DS…..but it may also be good for you. 
 

Goodnight. 

Edited Sunday at 04:10 AM by WrestlingRasta

[Caveira]

25 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

A) I don’t have bazillions to spend on anything. My counting starts and stops here locally. 
 

2) You haven’t shown a credible number on any truck.  Maybe you should start there.  It may get in the way of your something something DS…..but it may also be good for you. 
 

Goodnight. 

I mean I posted Fox News #.  It is in the video.  It is grey high.    I subsequently used le dukes Instead because it was lower.  You don’t wanna know what they cost or look into it ?

[RockLobster]

1 hour ago, Caveira said:

I mean I posted Fox News #.  It is in the video.  It is grey high.    I subsequently used le dukes Instead because it was lower.  You don’t wanna know what they cost or look into it ?

Good story. I'm interested, tell me more.

(But, put the bottle down first, you've obviously had more than enough.)

Edited Sunday at 06:15 AM by RockLobster

[Caveira]

Wapo.   Says 93 trucks https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2024/12/11/biden-usps-ev-oshkosh-climate/

[Caveira]

9 hours ago, WrestlingRasta said:

A) I don’t have bazillions to spend on anything. My counting starts and stops here locally. 
 

2) You haven’t shown a credible number on any truck.  Maybe you should start there.  It may get in the way of your something something DS…..but it may also be good for you. 
 

Goodnight. 

Yahoo 93

https://www.yahoo.com/tech/postal-services-plan-to-electrify-mail-trucks-falling-far-short-of-its-goal-190317071.html

[Caveira]

9 hours ago, WrestlingRasta said:

I don’t count chickens before they hatch.  

93 

https://www.engadget.com/transportation/evs/postal-services-plan-to-electrify-mail-trucks-falling-far-short-of-its-goal-190317071.html

[Caveira]

11 hours ago, Le duke said:

3,000 mail trucks.

Also, the president didn’t give the contract to them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

93 

https://postaltimes.com/the-postal-services-electric-mail-trucks-are-way-behind-schedule/

[Le duke]

Wapo.   Says 93 trucks https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2024/12/11/biden-usps-ev-oshkosh-climate/

In the summary itself, they say the contract is for 3,000.

93 have been delivered so far.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk