Is it true ...

[Paul158]

16 minutes ago, Saylors_Tiny_Willie said:

I see your failure to answer the question.

The answer is that Trump has had VASTLY more turnover in his administration and historic and unprecedented numbers of former officials refuse to back him.

The information you gave is of no value to me. It is of no value for the results on Tuesday. So, carry on. 

[Saylors_Tiny_Willie]

1 minute ago, Paul158 said:

The information you gave is of no value to me. It is of no value for the results on Tuesday. So, carry on. 

The information could have been Trump's Kremlin dossier and it still wouldn't affect your vote.

[Caveira]

2 minutes ago, Saylors_Tiny_Willie said:

The information could have been Trump's Kremlin dossier and it still wouldn't affect your vote.

They already paid Russia for a dossier no?

[Saylors_Tiny_Willie]

4 minutes ago, Caveira said:

They already paid Russia for a dossier no?

And Trump is still fellating Putin.

[Caveira]

20 minutes ago, Saylors_Tiny_Willie said:

And Trump is still fellating Putin.

Pics or it didn’t happen.  

[ionel]

50 minutes ago, Saylors_Tiny_Willie said:

Trump has had VASTLY more turnover in his administration and historic and unprecedented numbers of former officials refuse to back him.

So ... he never promised to behave like the average DC swamp rat.  

[Offthemat]

Anybody who claims that Trump would damage this country in any way in order to aid Putin or Russia has the intelligence of a fence post. 

[Caveira]

I found saylors 

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTF7PhbQy/

[ionel]

2 minutes ago, Offthemat said:

Anybody who claims that Trump would damage this country in any way in order to aid Putin or Russia has the intelligence of a fence post. 

Believe I've seen a few fence posts around these here parts.  

[Offthemat]

7 minutes ago, ionel said:

Believe I've seen a few fence posts around these here parts.  

I have too, and they can’t even find support from snopes or wiki anymore. 

[WrestlingRasta]

1 hour ago, Paul158 said:

The information you gave is of no value to me. It is of no value for the results on Tuesday. So, carry on. 

The fact that many many republicans who worked in his administration, are refusing to support him, and voting and in some cases even campaigning for the democrat whom they don’t agree with on policy, has significant value toward the results on Tuesday. 

[ionel]

11 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

The fact that many many republicans who worked in his administration, are refusing to support him, and voting and in some cases even campaigning for the democrat whom they don’t agree with on policy, has significant value toward the results on Tuesday. 

Then no worries correct? 

[Offthemat]

When you take into account that thousands more of the people who worked with, and for Trump, are supportive of Trump this time, and many have criticized and even accused the disgruntled of lying, and discount for the publicity whores, you still have to ignore your lying eyes to equate Trump with the accusations.  He wasn’t fascist, or dictator, or unconstitutional in his first term.  

[Caveira]

9 minutes ago, Offthemat said:

When you take into account that thousands more of the people who worked with, and for Trump, are supportive of Trump this time, and many have criticized and even accused the disgruntled of lying, and discount for the publicity whores, you still have to ignore your lying eyes to equate Trump with the accusations.  He wasn’t fascist, or dictator, or unconstitutional in his first term.  

But Earth is on the ballot this time?

[Paul158]

1 hour ago, Caveira said:

I found saylors 

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTF7PhbQy/

That might be about 70 percent of her supporter's thoughts right there.

[Saylors_Tiny_Willie]

1 hour ago, ionel said:

So ... he never promised to behave like the average DC swamp rat.  

lololol

He's a dipshit that everyone hates working for.

[Caveira]

2 minutes ago, Saylors_Tiny_Willie said:

lololol

He's a dipshit that everyone hates working for.

How desperate do you have to be to create a whole new fake account just to spill your political takes? Seriously, it's embarrassing. We’re already anonymous here, and you're out here hiding behind two layers because you’re too scared to own what you’re saying? That’s about as weak as it gets. Just admit you’re too gutless to stand by your words and save us all the trouble.  Reveal your main.   We all know you will disappear a few days after the election.  

[ionel]

1 minute ago, Saylors_Tiny_Willie said:

lololol

He's a dipshit that everyone hates working for.

So President of the United States is the perfect job for him.  No one "works for" the President they "serve at the pleasure of" the President. 

[Saylors_Tiny_Willie]

1 minute ago, Caveira said:

How desperate do you have to be to create a whole new fake account just to spill your political takes? Seriously, it's embarrassing. We’re already anonymous here, and you're out here hiding behind two layers because you’re too scared to own what you’re saying? That’s about as weak as it gets. Just admit you’re too gutless to stand by your words and save us all the trouble.  Reveal your main.   We all know you will disappear a few days after the election.  

Get it all out.

[Saylors_Tiny_Willie]

1 minute ago, ionel said:

So President of the United States is the perfect job for him.  No one "works for" the President they "serve at the pleasure of" the President. 

Trump had higher turnover than any president in modern history.
Trump had higher numbers of his senior staff who refused to endorse him than any president in modern history.
Trump had higher numbers of his senior staff who endorsed his opponent than any president in modern history.

Does this make any sort of dent?
 

[Caveira]

4 minutes ago, Saylors_Tiny_Willie said:

Get it all out.

Hard to be credible when you hide like a coward.  

[ionel]

1 minute ago, Saylors_Tiny_Willie said:

Trump had higher turnover than any president in modern history.

Who cares?

6 minutes ago, Saylors_Tiny_Willie said:

Trump had higher numbers of his senior staff who refused to endorse him than any president in modern history.

Who cares?

6 minutes ago, Saylors_Tiny_Willie said:

Trump had higher numbers of his senior staff who endorsed his opponent than any president in modern history.

Who cares?

7 minutes ago, Saylors_Tiny_Willie said:

Does this make any sort of dent?

Nah

[Offthemat]

See if you can spot the difference in a campaign based on non-sensical propaganda and one based on intellect. 
 

 

 

[Caveira]

2 minutes ago, Offthemat said:

See if you can spot the difference in a campaign based on non-sensical propaganda and one based on intellect. 
 

 

 

I posted this somewhere earlier.  It’s amazing that in the digital age…. where we can see what they say…. When they say.    Where they are has not changed much.   I wonder if that’s why they want censorship.  

[jross]

1 hour ago, Saylors_Tiny_Willie said:

Trump had higher turnover than any president in modern history.
Trump had higher numbers of his senior staff who refused to endorse him than any president in modern history.
Trump had higher numbers of his senior staff who endorsed his opponent than any president in modern history.

Does this make any sort of dent?
 

I would love to see Ron Paul and Elon Musk team up on DOGE and create higher turnover than the previous 45 presidents combined.