braves121 Posted July 15 Posted July 15 Just now, JimmyBT said: I’ll educate you a little. She ruled that the no statute grants an attorney general authority to appoint a federal officer with the kind of prosecution nail power wielded by special council smith. Hence the no vetting. Thanks for reiterating everything i just wrote. That’s also not the same as no vetting lmao
JimmyBT Posted July 15 Author Posted July 15 Someone on this thread already said this will get appealed. So yes, not over. Yet it won’t matter if/when Trump wins the election.
JimmyBT Posted July 15 Author Posted July 15 (edited) 1 minute ago, braves121 said: Thanks for reiterating everything i just wrote. That’s also not the same as no vetting lmao Ok ignored or faulty vetting. And that’s nothing close to what you said. Bahahhahahaha. Either way they f d up the vetting process. Pretty simple. Edited July 15 by JimmyBT
JimmyBT Posted July 15 Author Posted July 15 The witch hunt was handled poorly. This was probably the case they had the best chance of nailing him on. Sucks to suck.
braves121 Posted July 15 Posted July 15 (edited) 3 minutes ago, JimmyBT said: Ok ignored or faulty vetting. And that’s nothing close to what you said. Bahahhahahaha. Either way they f d up the vetting process. Pretty simple. she ruled it unconstitutional because she says the AG can’t appoint special counsels even though that’s been happening for 30 years she ruled that the no statute grants an attorney general authority to appoint a federal officer with the kind of prosecution nail power wielded by special council smith. where is the difference in our 2 statements? What is so different that what you said is nothing close to what i said? Edited July 15 by braves121
JimmyBT Posted July 15 Author Posted July 15 2 minutes ago, braves121 said: she ruled it unconstitutional because she says the AG can’t appoint special counsels even though that’s been happening for 30 years she ruled that the no statute grants an attorney general authority to appoint a federal officer with the kind of prosecution nail power wielded by special council smith. where is the difference in our 2 statements? What is so different that what you said is nothing close to what i said? The type of prosecutor with the power he has.
JimmyBT Posted July 15 Author Posted July 15 It means there were plenty of other judges that could have been appointed and it would have been just fine.
JimmyBT Posted July 15 Author Posted July 15 18 minutes ago, braves121 said: What crime has Biden committed? When he had documents in his garage unattended that his criminal son had access to.
braves121 Posted July 15 Posted July 15 Just now, JimmyBT said: When he had documents in his garage unattended that his criminal son had access to. Well good news the SC rules presidents have immunity especially in this specific example so he’s not a criminal
braves121 Posted July 15 Posted July 15 2 minutes ago, JimmyBT said: It means there were plenty of other judges that could have been appointed and it would have been just fine. You have no idea what you are talking about and lack reading comprehension i blame lead poisoning
JimmyBT Posted July 15 Author Posted July 15 1 minute ago, braves121 said: Well good news the SC rules presidents have immunity especially in this specific example so he’s not a criminal Yet he committed a crime. You asked me what crime he committed. Not if he’s a criminal.
JimmyBT Posted July 15 Author Posted July 15 (edited) 5 minutes ago, braves121 said: You have no idea what you are talking about and lack reading comprehension i blame lead poisoning Take your L and run along. Smith is the problem. Sorry it’s that hard for you. I blame too much time standing in the free cheese line. Edited July 15 by JimmyBT
braves121 Posted July 15 Posted July 15 4 minutes ago, JimmyBT said: When he had documents in his garage unattended that his criminal son had access to. You mean like when he returned them compared to trump hid them in a bathroom people who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones
JimmyBT Posted July 15 Author Posted July 15 24 minutes ago, braves121 said: What crime has Biden committed? Remember when this is what you asked.
JimmyBT Posted July 15 Author Posted July 15 (edited) 5 minutes ago, braves121 said: You mean like when he returned them compared to trump hid them in a bathroom people who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones Exactly. They’re both guilty. You can be thankful for the SC when Trump pardons himself after he’s elected. Remember after he does he won’t be a criminal. The same as Biden. Edited July 15 by JimmyBT
braves121 Posted July 15 Posted July 15 1 minute ago, JimmyBT said: Exactly. They’re both guilty. You can be thankful for the SC when Trump pardons himself after he’s elected. So in this situation you yourself made up trump and Biden did the same thing but Biden goes to jail? The mental gymnastics is crazy
JimmyBT Posted July 15 Author Posted July 15 1 minute ago, braves121 said: So in this situation you yourself made up trump and Biden did the same thing but Biden goes to jail? The mental gymnastics is crazy Neither are going to jail even though the both committed the same mistake. Pretty simple. If you’re not S. L. O. W. 1
braves121 Posted July 15 Posted July 15 1 minute ago, JimmyBT said: Neither are going to jail even though the both committed the same mistake. Pretty simple. If you’re not S. L. O. W. My guy you literally typed out and posted that trump will get pardoned but Biden will not. What are you on about?
Bigbrog Posted July 15 Posted July 15 30 minutes ago, braves121 said: My guy you literally typed out and posted that trump will get pardoned but Biden will not. What are you on about? Not trying to get into this squabble but that is not what Jimmy said. 1
JimmyBT Posted July 15 Author Posted July 15 34 minutes ago, braves121 said: My guy you literally typed out and posted that trump will get pardoned but Biden will not. What are you on about? Show me where I said Biden won’t get pardoned. I’ll wait.
red viking Posted July 15 Posted July 15 You can't make this stuff up. His case is "thrown out" by a judge that he appointed. It will certainly get appealed & reversed by any even somewhat neutral/objective judges.
JimmyBT Posted July 15 Author Posted July 15 27 minutes ago, red viking said: You can't make this stuff up. His case is "thrown out" by a judge that he appointed. It will certainly get appealed & reversed by any even somewhat neutral/objective judges. Won’t matter when trump becomes President now will it ?
ionel Posted July 15 Posted July 15 27 minutes ago, red viking said: You can't make this stuff up. His case is "thrown out" by a judge that he appointed. It will certainly get appealed & reversed by any even somewhat neutral/objective judges. and you are willing to bet how much? 1 .
Offthemat Posted July 15 Posted July 15 1 hour ago, ionel said: and you are willing to bet how much? They don’t call you ‘easy money’ for nothing.
ionel Posted July 15 Posted July 15 4 minutes ago, Offthemat said: They don’t call you ‘easy money’ for nothing. Loser vacates the boards for a year, @BobDole verifies? 3 .
Calli Gilchrist Choate Rosemary Hall, Connecticut Class of 2025 Committed to Brown (Women) Projected Weight: 124
Eren Sement Council Rock North, Pennsylvania Class of 2025 Committed to Michigan Projected Weight: 141
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now