Starting at 285

[BigRedFan]

To give Brooks his due.

[ionel]

1 minute ago, BigRedFan said:

To give Brooks his due.

So he'll be the last to be interviewed or last to wrestle?  

[D3UC157]

I feel like the best option is picking the order and ignoring the weight sequence.

[BigRedFan]

1 minute ago, ionel said:

So he'll be the last to be interviewed or last to wrestle?  

Must see TV

[Pinnacle]

Ben Riach poured. Cheddar Gruyere and flatbread alongside. 

Let it rip.

Edited March 23 by Pinnacle

[PortaJohn]

6 minutes ago, D3UC157 said:

I feel like the best option is picking the order and ignoring the weight sequence.

If only they could think outside the box.  That's asking a lot

[Hammerlock3]

7 minutes ago, D3UC157 said:

I feel like the best option is picking the order and ignoring the weight sequence.

yeah but then you're leaning into the arbitrary. You can pick the biggest match, don't you think there would be diminishing returns trying to rank all ten in terms of value?

[CHROMEBIRD]

It would be like picking songs for a mixtape

[D3UC157]

4 minutes ago, Hammerlock3 said:

yeah but then you're leaning into the arbitrary. You can pick the biggest match, don't you think there would be diminishing returns trying to rank all ten in terms of value?

If we’re going to value one over all the others, why not ‘rank’ all of them?

Sucks for someone who gets a position viewed as lesser but there is a hierarchy and there are high-value matches. 
But, put on the best show.

[D3UC157]

7 minutes ago, CHROMEBIRD said:

It would be like picking songs for a mixtape

Accurate and eventually you pick an order.

[Hammerlock3]

2 minutes ago, D3UC157 said:

If we’re going to value one over all the others, why not ‘rank’ all of them?

Sucks for someone who gets a position viewed as lesser but there is a hierarchy and there are high-value matches. 
But, put on the best show.

but its sooo far from being an exact science. just feels like its tinkering.

[D3UC157]

1 minute ago, Hammerlock3 said:

but its sooo far from being an exact science. just feels like its tinkering.

100% tinkering 

[forkemaz]

27 minutes ago, Hammerlock3 said:

yeah but then you're leaning into the arbitrary. You can pick the biggest match, don't you think there would be diminishing returns trying to rank all ten in terms of value?

No MMA has done this since it's inception.

[Hammerlock3]

19 minutes ago, forkemaz said:

No MMA has done this since it's inception.

i feel compelled to argue but can't really think of a good reason that doesn't make sense.