ionel Posted March 23 Posted March 23 1 minute ago, BigRedFan said: To give Brooks his due. So he'll be the last to be interviewed or last to wrestle? .
D3UC157 Posted March 23 Posted March 23 I feel like the best option is picking the order and ignoring the weight sequence.
BigRedFan Posted March 23 Author Posted March 23 1 minute ago, ionel said: So he'll be the last to be interviewed or last to wrestle? Must see TV
Pinnacle Posted March 23 Posted March 23 (edited) Ben Riach poured. Cheddar Gruyere and flatbread alongside. Let it rip. Edited March 23 by Pinnacle
PortaJohn Posted March 23 Posted March 23 6 minutes ago, D3UC157 said: I feel like the best option is picking the order and ignoring the weight sequence. If only they could think outside the box. That's asking a lot 2 I Don't Agree With What I Posted
Hammerlock3 Posted March 23 Posted March 23 7 minutes ago, D3UC157 said: I feel like the best option is picking the order and ignoring the weight sequence. yeah but then you're leaning into the arbitrary. You can pick the biggest match, don't you think there would be diminishing returns trying to rank all ten in terms of value? "Half measures are a coward's form of insanity."
D3UC157 Posted March 23 Posted March 23 4 minutes ago, Hammerlock3 said: yeah but then you're leaning into the arbitrary. You can pick the biggest match, don't you think there would be diminishing returns trying to rank all ten in terms of value? If we’re going to value one over all the others, why not ‘rank’ all of them? Sucks for someone who gets a position viewed as lesser but there is a hierarchy and there are high-value matches. But, put on the best show.
D3UC157 Posted March 23 Posted March 23 7 minutes ago, CHROMEBIRD said: It would be like picking songs for a mixtape Accurate and eventually you pick an order.
Hammerlock3 Posted March 23 Posted March 23 2 minutes ago, D3UC157 said: If we’re going to value one over all the others, why not ‘rank’ all of them? Sucks for someone who gets a position viewed as lesser but there is a hierarchy and there are high-value matches. But, put on the best show. but its sooo far from being an exact science. just feels like its tinkering. "Half measures are a coward's form of insanity."
D3UC157 Posted March 23 Posted March 23 1 minute ago, Hammerlock3 said: but its sooo far from being an exact science. just feels like its tinkering. 100% tinkering 1
forkemaz Posted March 23 Posted March 23 27 minutes ago, Hammerlock3 said: yeah but then you're leaning into the arbitrary. You can pick the biggest match, don't you think there would be diminishing returns trying to rank all ten in terms of value? No MMA has done this since it's inception. 1
Hammerlock3 Posted March 23 Posted March 23 19 minutes ago, forkemaz said: No MMA has done this since it's inception. i feel compelled to argue but can't really think of a good reason that doesn't make sense. 1 "Half measures are a coward's form of insanity."
Calli Gilchrist Choate Rosemary Hall, Connecticut Class of 2025 Committed to Brown (Women) Projected Weight: 124
Eren Sement Council Rock North, Pennsylvania Class of 2025 Committed to Michigan Projected Weight: 141
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now