Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Greetings Gents... thought this would be cool/intersting to look at.  For argument's sake, I am only going to look at Semifinals and on to see how things might have shaked out.

125
SF1
Old: Suriano over Cruz via 2-0 Decision
New: Suriano over Cruz via 2-0 Decision
SF2
Old: Lee over Tomasello via Pinfell at 6M5S (Up 8-2)
New: Lee over Tomasello via Pinfell at 6M5S (Up 10-3)
Final
Old: Lee over Suriano via 5-1 Decision
New: Lee over Suriano via 7-1 Decision

133
SF1
Old: Gross over Wilson via Pinfell at 7M18S (OT) (Up 12-10)
New: Wilson over Gross via 15-11 Decision
SF2
Old: Micic over Pletcher via 8-4 Decision
New: Micic over Pletcher via 10-5 Decision
Final
Old: Gross over Micic via 13-8 Decision
New: Gross over Micic via 14-12 Decision
*Not sure how a Wilson-Micic match would have went.

141
SF1
Old: Meredith over McKenna via 1-0 Decision
New: Meredith over McKenna via 1-0 Decision
SF2
Old: Diakomihalis over Eierman via 6-4 Decision (OT)
New: Diakomihalis over Eierman via 8-5 Decision (OT)
Final
Old: Diakomihalis over Meredith via 7-4 Decision
New: Diakomihalis over Meredith via 9-5 Decision

149
SF1
Old: Retherford over Heilmann via 10-4 Decision
New: Retherford over Heilmann via 14-4 Major
SF2
Old: Perry over Kolodzik via 5-3 Decision
New: Perry over Kolodzik via 6-4 Decision
Final
Old: Retherford over Perry via 6-2 Decision
New: Retherford over Perry via 8-2 Decision

157
SF1
Old: Hidlay over Pantaleo via 10-2 Major
New: Hidlay over Pantaleo via 11-3 Major
SF2
Old: Nolf over Jordan via 16-0 Tech (4M28S)
New: Nolf over Jordan via 18-0 Tech (4M28S)
Final
Old: Nolf over Hidlay via 6-2 Decision
New: Nolf over Hidlay via 8-2 Decision

165
SF1
Old: Martinez over Marinelli via 5-2 Decision
New: Martinez over Marinelli via 7-2 Decision
SF2
Old: Joseph over McFadden via 3-1 Decision
New: Joseph over McFadden via 4-1 Decision
Final
Old: Joseph over Martnez via 6-1 Decision
New: Joseph over Martnez via 7-1 Decision

174
SF1
Old: Valencia over Amine via 7-5 Decision
New: Valencia over Amine via 8-7 Decision (Amine gave up 2 points via stalling)
SF2
Old: Hall over Lewis via Pinfell at 6M22S (Up 8-2)
New: Hall over Lewis via Pinfell at 6M22S (Up 11-2)
Final
Old: Valencia over Hall via 8-2 Decision
New: Valencia over Hall via 11-2 Major

184
SF1
Old: Nickal over Abounader via 6-3 Decision
New: Nickal over Abounader via 8-3 Decision
SF2
Old: Martin over Zavatsky via 8-4 Decision
New: Martin over Zavatsky via 10-4 Decision
Final
Old: Nickal over Martin via Pinfell at 2M30S (Tied 2-2)
New: Nickal over Martin via Pinfell at 2M30S (Down 3-2)

197
SF1
Old: Macchiavello over Conel via Pinfell at 4M19S (Up 6-2)
New: Macchiavello over Conel via Pinfell at 4M19S (Up 8-3)
SF2
Old: Haught over Darmstadt via Pinfell at 5M41S (Up 4-2)
New: Haught over Darmstadt via Pinfell at 5M41S (Up 6-2)
Final
Old: Macchiavello over Haught via 3-1 Decision
New: Macchiavello over Haught via 4-1 Decision

285
SF1
Old: Snyder over Kasper via 10-5 Decision
New: Snyder over Kasper via 14-6 Major
SF2
Old: Coon over Dhesi via 4-2 Decision
New: Coon over Dhesi via 5-3 Decision
Final
Old: Snyder over Coon via 3-2 Decision
New: Snyder over Coon via 4-2 Decision

  • Fire 2

"I know actually nothing.  It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me

 

 

Posted

A few other 'key' matchups... at least for Michigan standards...

Abounader would have tied Parker in the consi-semis at 6-6 to send it in to overtime rather than a .  That match was SUPER chippy.  Parker got an escape with 9S remaining to win it 6-5.  Maybe he doesn't get that escape?

At 174 Amine would have beaten Lewis outright via 3-2 Decision for 3rd rather than in OT.

At 165 Massa would have beaten Rogers in the Consis with a 2-1 TD edge and would not have gone in to OT.  Aside for one match where he decided to be more Massa than ThugMassa G against Valencia, he owned that rivalry - so Massa would have brought home AA honors... perhaps making a run to third (he was 50/50 with Wick basically... and holds the advantage on McFadden and Marstellar in their careers.  Walsh would have been a wildcard match).

At 157 Pantaleo still gets beat up by Kemererereer on the backside and soundly beats Jordan for 5th.

At 149 Amine beats Hayes in their first round via having a 1-0 TD edge and the match doesn't go in to OT.  He is in the match against Blees of VT and Heilmann of North Carolina.  Wouldn't that have been wild?

At 133 Micic basically stays the same.

At 125 Mattin loses on the backside to Lizak 18-7 rather than 17-6.

 

"I know actually nothing.  It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me

 

 

Posted

Surprisingly few differences in match results. IMO, Gross over Wilson always seemed to be a good example of what was wrong with the old scoring system not putting enough emphasis on TDs. 

Your scenarios assume that both wrestlers would have wrestled the exact same match despite what was on the scoreboard and the new incentive to score TDs.

If the new rule does not change the how matches are wrestled there is not much point in the rule change.

Just curious, in your re-scoring of the matches did you factor in the new riding time rules, not getting a RT point unless there is exposure?

Posted
9 minutes ago, Jim L said:

Surprisingly few differences in match results. IMO, Gross over Wilson always seemed to be a good example of what was wrong with the old scoring system not putting enough emphasis on TDs. 

Your scenarios assume that both wrestlers would have wrestled the exact same match despite what was on the scoreboard and the new incentive to score TDs.

If the new rule does not change the how matches are wrestled there is not much point in the rule change.

Just curious, in your re-scoring of the matches did you factor in the new riding time rules, not getting a RT point unless there is exposure?

This isn't a thing.  Was not approved.

"I know actually nothing.  It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, nhs67 said:

A few other 'key' matchups... at least for Michigan standards...

Abounader would have tied Parker in the consi-semis at 6-6 to send it in to overtime rather than a .  That match was SUPER chippy.  Parker got an escape with 9S remaining to win it 6-5.  Maybe he doesn't get that escape?

At 174 Amine would have beaten Lewis outright via 3-2 Decision for 3rd rather than in OT.

At 165 Massa would have beaten Rogers in the Consis with a 2-1 TD edge and would not have gone in to OT.  Aside for one match where he decided to be more Massa than ThugMassa G against Valencia, he owned that rivalry - so Massa would have brought home AA honors... perhaps making a run to third (he was 50/50 with Wick basically... and holds the advantage on McFadden and Marstellar in their careers.  Walsh would have been a wildcard match).

At 157 Pantaleo still gets beat up by Kemererereer on the backside and soundly beats Jordan for 5th.

At 149 Amine beats Hayes in their first round via having a 1-0 TD edge and the match doesn't go in to OT.  He is in the match against Blees of VT and Heilmann of North Carolina.  Wouldn't that have been wild?

At 133 Micic basically stays the same.

At 125 Mattin loses on the backside to Lizak 18-7 rather than 17-6.

 

Good stuff man! Do you type this up with your phone or computer?  

Posted
2 minutes ago, Ohio Elite said:

Good stuff man! Do you type this up with your phone or computer?  

I have to do it from the computer today.

People got mad at me for calling people from Japan and Poland, respectively not as people from Japan and Poland?  So I adjusted for the day.

It's been a rough day.

  • Fire 1

"I know actually nothing.  It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me

 

 

Posted
8 minutes ago, nhs67 said:

This isn't a thing.  Was not approved.

Did not know that.  Well, I am not going let this new information change my thinking

Posted

Good recap. Thanks for putting it together.

Not that surprising.  I expect the margins of victory to look different but the results to be similar.  Generally, if someone gets more TDs they typically win.  I know there a few exceptions but 1 out of 30 seems about right. 

My fear is we will see more stalling in the 3rd since the margin will be wider and the impact of a stalling call will be less severe.  Hope that isn't the case.

  • Fire 1
Posted
4 hours ago, nhs67 said:

Greetings Gents... thought this would be cool/intersting to look at.  For argument's sake, I am only going to look at Semifinals and on to see how things might have shaked out.

125
SF1
Old: Suriano over Cruz via 2-0 Decision
New: Suriano over Cruz via 2-0 Decision
SF2
Old: Lee over Tomasello via Pinfell at 6M5S (Up 8-2)
New: Lee over Tomasello via Pinfell at 6M5S (Up 10-3)
Final
Old: Lee over Suriano via 5-1 Decision
New: Lee over Suriano via 7-1 Decision

133
SF1
Old: Gross over Wilson via Pinfell at 7M18S (OT) (Up 12-10)
New: Wilson over Gross via 15-11 Decision
SF2
Old: Micic over Pletcher via 8-4 Decision
New: Micic over Pletcher via 10-5 Decision
Final
Old: Gross over Micic via 13-8 Decision
New: Gross over Micic via 14-12 Decision
*Not sure how a Wilson-Micic match would have went.

141
SF1
Old: Meredith over McKenna via 1-0 Decision
New: Meredith over McKenna via 1-0 Decision
SF2
Old: Diakomihalis over Eierman via 6-4 Decision (OT)
New: Diakomihalis over Eierman via 8-5 Decision (OT)
Final
Old: Diakomihalis over Meredith via 7-4 Decision
New: Diakomihalis over Meredith via 9-5 Decision

149
SF1
Old: Retherford over Heilmann via 10-4 Decision
New: Retherford over Heilmann via 14-4 Major
SF2
Old: Perry over Kolodzik via 5-3 Decision
New: Perry over Kolodzik via 6-4 Decision
Final
Old: Retherford over Perry via 6-2 Decision
New: Retherford over Perry via 8-2 Decision

157
SF1
Old: Hidlay over Pantaleo via 10-2 Major
New: Hidlay over Pantaleo via 11-3 Major
SF2
Old: Nolf over Jordan via 16-0 Tech (4M28S)
New: Nolf over Jordan via 18-0 Tech (4M28S)
Final
Old: Nolf over Hidlay via 6-2 Decision
New: Nolf over Hidlay via 8-2 Decision

165
SF1
Old: Martinez over Marinelli via 5-2 Decision
New: Martinez over Marinelli via 7-2 Decision
SF2
Old: Joseph over McFadden via 3-1 Decision
New: Joseph over McFadden via 4-1 Decision
Final
Old: Joseph over Martnez via 6-1 Decision
New: Joseph over Martnez via 7-1 Decision

174
SF1
Old: Valencia over Amine via 7-5 Decision
New: Valencia over Amine via 8-7 Decision (Amine gave up 2 points via stalling)
SF2
Old: Hall over Lewis via Pinfell at 6M22S (Up 8-2)
New: Hall over Lewis via Pinfell at 6M22S (Up 11-2)
Final
Old: Valencia over Hall via 8-2 Decision
New: Valencia over Hall via 11-2 Major

184
SF1
Old: Nickal over Abounader via 6-3 Decision
New: Nickal over Abounader via 8-3 Decision
SF2
Old: Martin over Zavatsky via 8-4 Decision
New: Martin over Zavatsky via 10-4 Decision
Final
Old: Nickal over Martin via Pinfell at 2M30S (Tied 2-2)
New: Nickal over Martin via Pinfell at 2M30S (Down 3-2)

197
SF1
Old: Macchiavello over Conel via Pinfell at 4M19S (Up 6-2)
New: Macchiavello over Conel via Pinfell at 4M19S (Up 8-3)
SF2
Old: Haught over Darmstadt via Pinfell at 5M41S (Up 4-2)
New: Haught over Darmstadt via Pinfell at 5M41S (Up 6-2)
Final
Old: Macchiavello over Haught via 3-1 Decision
New: Macchiavello over Haught via 4-1 Decision

285
SF1
Old: Snyder over Kasper via 10-5 Decision
New: Snyder over Kasper via 14-6 Major
SF2
Old: Coon over Dhesi via 4-2 Decision
New: Coon over Dhesi via 5-3 Decision
Final
Old: Snyder over Coon via 3-2 Decision
New: Snyder over Coon via 4-2 Decision

You lost me at pinfell.  🙄

2BPE 11/17/24 SMC

Posted
8 minutes ago, jchapman said:

He lost me at "shaked."

Shook?  Is it shook?

"I know actually nothing.  It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me

 

 

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, nhs67 said:

@Wrestleknownothing

Educate this toon?

Wkn is too busy doing cartwheels over all the pinfells in this thread.

BTW:  thats Mr. Toon to you boy.  

Edited by ionel

2BPE 11/17/24 SMC

Posted
44 minutes ago, nhs67 said:

Shook?  Is it shook?

Yes, but I have to be honest I googled it just to be sure!

  • Haha 1

Craig Henning got screwed in the 2007 NCAA Finals.

Posted
19 hours ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

There are limits

hay now!

if a pin fell in a message forum and all had their volume on mute would any know?

2BPE 11/17/24 SMC

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...