Jump to content

Will Devon Archer ( Burisma)live long enough to testify before congress concerning Joe and Hunter Biden? July 31.

Paul158

By Paul158
in Non Wrestling Topics

 Share

Recommended Posts

WrestlingRasta Big Brain

WrestlingRasta

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Paul158 said:

Can you imagine all the companies that have a lot of office personnel watching the proceedings on computers and phones when they should be doing their work. The networks would celebrating .

Yeah but how much of that time is just diverted from social media etc (of which I can be guilty) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 354
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Gus
Gus

Even people that run with a sincere interest in bettering their community become compromised when they hold office for an extended period of time. 

Threadkilla
Threadkilla

Where did anybody say that Biden is some mastermind running everything?  He's a puppet.  He just happened to end up at the top of the heap of shit.  He is still a  semi senile stumbling fool.  Doesn't

Offthemat
Offthemat

Don’t forget that in the same election that put fetterman in office, Pennsylvania also elected a dead democrat.  If you don’t think vote by mail and drop-boxes are a problem, he was dead a month befor

Posted Images

Paul158 Big Brain

Paul158

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
19 minutes ago, Plasmodium said:

I don't like it.

Pools on individual counts, length of prison term, whether individual number 1 will testify.  How he'll look in orange, sans makeup.  This will cost the country trillions in productivity!!

Well this is where we are. Its not good.

Edited by Paul158
missed a word
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Paul158 Big Brain

Paul158

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

Good. Kill two birds with one stone. Annihilate the media, and put a wanna be dictator away for good. 

(I just had to throw that last one in there to push some buttons 😁)

Man you really know how to hurt a guy.

  • Fire 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Offthemat Big Brain

Offthemat

Posted
Posted (edited)
On 8/5/2023 at 11:17 AM, WrestlingRasta said:

Just a partial list of the 86 witnesses who gave the indicting grand jury of citizens, incriminating evidence against Trump. 
 

1FAD16EE-AEF2-4282-A3D9-233E858B882C.jpeg.bbdbc199295f40d0e374c46f3f8701a5.jpeg
 

 

 

Three from this list, (Pence, Giulliani, Epshteyn) have said in the last two days that they didn’t think Trump did anything wrong.  What wasn’t included in that lamebrained indictment was any exculpatory evidence.  That’s on top of the fact that Smith has once again contrived statutes into a law that doesn’t exist.  A competent judge would throw it out before it started, and very well may on pre trial challenges. 

Edited by BobDole
Put the reply outside of the quote
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Offthemat Big Brain

Offthemat

Posted
Posted
45 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

They may have said that on TV, but apparently not under oath. I can’t imagine prosecutors would list them as witnesses because under oath out from the view from cameras they said that ‘he did nothing wrong’

Good thing to hang your hat on though. 

You forgot, I told you already that the indictment left out all exculpatory evidence.  If it ever goes to trial you’ll see. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WrestlingRasta Big Brain

WrestlingRasta

Posted
Posted
50 minutes ago, Offthemat said:

You forgot, I told you already that the indictment left out all exculpatory evidence.  If it ever goes to trial you’ll see. 

You say ‘left out’ as if it’s supposed to be in the indictment. 

Yes, we will see what comes out at trial, you’re not saying anything I haven’t said numerous times. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Offthemat Big Brain

Offthemat

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

You say ‘left out’ as if it’s supposed to be in the indictment. 

Yes, we will see what comes out at trial, you’re not saying anything I haven’t said numerous times. 

As in, one should take into account when making an evaluation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WrestlingRasta Big Brain

WrestlingRasta

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Offthemat said:

As in, one should take into account when making an evaluation. 

I’ll be sure to evaluate the trial when it takes place. It hasn’t, so for now can only evaluate what has been presented. 
 

If you can find somewhere on here where I’ve said he’s for sure guilty, I’ll wait to read it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Offthemat Big Brain

Offthemat

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

I’ll be sure to evaluate the trial when it takes place. It hasn’t, so for now can only evaluate what has been presented. 
 

If you can find somewhere on here where I’ve said he’s for sure guilty, I’ll wait to read it. 

No, no.  Just evidence in the indictment that is so incriminating, so damning, so indefensible.  
Taking it all, as they intended, at face value, without doubt. 

  • Fire 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Paul158 Big Brain

Paul158

Posted
  • Author
Posted
4 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

More so than everyone have the opportunity to see it for themselves, instead of hearing about it from Benny Johnson or JoJo?

How about CCTV on the DOJ YouTube channel? 

The general public just might go crazy if they don't televise it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...