Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, Mike Parrish said:

Some of you seem to be seeking out stuff I wouldn't want or have in my browser history.

I do see lots and lots of news stories about GOP types caught with kiddy porn lately.

 

Tell me, do you believe that democrats harvest adrenochrome from children?

just as many on the left on epstein's guest list as the right...

at some point you will realize you are just falling for this team BS...

as per design...

Posted
5 minutes ago, LJB said:

just as many on the left on epstein's guest list as the right...

at some point you will realize you are just falling for this team BS...

as per design...

As for Epstein's little book, I say let the chips fall where they may.
If someone was in on that shit, then they should burn.

That being said, some of the kookiest hoaxes that large number of people believed, like Pizzagate, Adrenochrome, kitty litter boxes in classrooms, etc, etc, came exclusively from the right wing and was adopted whole cloth by the base.

Posted
10 minutes ago, Mike Parrish said:

As for Epstein's little book, I say let the chips fall where they may.
If someone was in on that shit, then they should burn.

That being said, some of the kookiest hoaxes that large number of people believed, like Pizzagate, Adrenochrome, kitty litter boxes in classrooms, etc, etc, came exclusively from the right wing and was adopted whole cloth by the base.

keep telling yourself that...

GO TEAM, GO!!!!!!

  • Fire 1
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Husker_Du said:

so, in other words, you're uninformed on the subject? 

If you have to follow Twitter to be "informed" on a subject - ummm.

That's kind of a crazy bar for validation. Since, let's be honest, Twitter is mostly garbage on top of garbage.

Weird that anyone would think they'd find anything BUT garbage there. Much less that those that don't follow Twitter are uninformed.

Edited by GreatWhiteNorth
Posted

so, if GOP types get caught with kiddie porn,

then that means that there aren't tons of vids of trans people being overtly sexual to kids? 

im failing to see a point and instead see deflection. 

TBD

Posted
2 minutes ago, GreatWhiteNorth said:

If you have to follow Twitter to be "informed" on a subject - ummm.

That's kind of a crazy bar for validation. Since, let's be honest, Twitter is mostly garbage on top of garbage.

Weird that anyone would think they'd find anything BUT garbage there. Much less that those that don't follow Twitter are uninformed.

Me: There are a lot of videos of adults sexualizing children

Him: Where. You must search them out.

Me: They are all over twitter.

simply saying 'i don't see them' is not an excuse. and that i see them on twitter (among other places) does not invalidate that they exist. 

you fucking nut bags jump through a lot of hoops to deny what's readily available and evident to most.

and if you don't see them, then don't fucking talk out of your ass. 

it's like arguing with 3rd graders. only the intentionally obtuse part is b/c you're irrationally tied to a social movement. 

  • Fire 1

TBD

Posted
2 hours ago, Mike Parrish said:

As for Epstein's little book, I say let the chips fall where they may.
If someone was in on that shit, then they should burn.

That being said, some of the kookiest hoaxes that large number of people believed, like Pizzagate, Adrenochrome, kitty litter boxes in classrooms, etc, etc, came exclusively from the right wing and was adopted whole cloth by the base.

they were not/are not believed to be true 'whole cloth' by the right.

i'm noticing a pattern wherein you take kooks on the right and act as if 'that's the entire right'. i.e. trump bucks. 

would you say the number of people that believe in pizzagate are more or less than those on the left that can define what a woman is? 

TBD

Posted
20 minutes ago, Husker_Du said:

they were not/are not believed to be true 'whole cloth' by the right.

i'm noticing a pattern wherein you take kooks on the right and act as if 'that's the entire right'. i.e. trump bucks. 

would you say the number of people that believe in pizzagate are more or less than those on the left that can define what a woman is? 

Those don't seem entirely equivalent to me.

YMMV

Posted
1 hour ago, Husker_Du said:

so, if GOP types get caught with kiddie porn,

then that means that there aren't tons of vids of trans people being overtly sexual to kids? 

im failing to see a point and instead see deflection. 

I'll assist you:

  • GOP types get caught with kiddie porn - these folks aren't good.
    But that doesn't make the entire GOP community bad.
  • Trans types get caught being overtly sexual to kids - these folks aren't good.
    But that doesn't make the entire trans community bad.
  • Fire 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Husker_Du said:

Me: There are a lot of videos of adults sexualizing children

Him: Where. You must search them out.

Me: They are all over twitter.

simply saying 'i don't see them' is not an excuse. and that i see them on twitter (among other places) does not invalidate that they exist. 

you ***duck duck goose** nut bags jump through a lot of hoops to deny what's readily available and evident to most.

and if you don't see them, then don't ***duck duck goose** talk out of your ass. 

it's like arguing with 3rd graders. only the intentionally obtuse part is b/c you're irrationally tied to a social movement. 

The reality is that just about any ***duck duck goose** thing is readily available on the internet. Doesn't matter how twisted or perverted - it's all out there.

It's not about denying that it's available (since, literally, everything is.) 

Simply put - I don't understand why someone would have to be viewing that garbage in order to be considered informed.

... or worse. That if we aren't viewing that garbage, that somehow, we are uninformed and aren't entitled to an opinion? Nope, that's not right.

  • Fire 1
Posted

Can we all just agree that the real victim in all of this is Bill Gates?

If a billionaire can't have a side-piece without it being used against him by a (presumably) Israeli intelligence asset, what has the world come to?

  • Fire 1
Posted
12 hours ago, GreatWhiteNorth said:

I'll assist you:

  • GOP types get caught with kiddie porn - these folks aren't good.
    But that doesn't make the entire GOP community bad.
  • Trans types get caught being overtly sexual to kids - these folks aren't good.
    But that doesn't make the entire trans community bad.

no shit. that's precisely my point. 

try telling this to other posters on here.

i say 'there's vids trans functions sexualizing children' and the response is

1) yeah i don't see them or

2) yeah but what about....

 

it's juvenile

TBD

Posted
12 hours ago, Theo Brixton said:

Can we all just agree that the real victim in all of this is Bill Gates?

If a billionaire can't have a side-piece without it being used against him by a (presumably) Israeli intelligence asset, what has the world come to?

that side piece was a minor

TBD

Posted
2 hours ago, Mike Parrish said:

you do know that it's possible to be gay and also against the exploitation of minors, right?

there's an entire gay movement against groomers. which is awesome. 

i have no idea what the author of that tweet is suggesting, nor what your impetus is for sharing it. 

are you saying if you're gay you have to be FOR sexualizing children? 

TBD

Posted
17 minutes ago, Husker_Du said:

you do know that it's possible to be gay and also against the exploitation of minors, right?

there's an entire gay movement against groomers. which is awesome. 

i have no idea what the author of that tweet is suggesting, nor what your impetus is for sharing it. 

are you saying if you're gay you have to be FOR sexualizing children? 

No, I'm saying that some people who spend lots of time demonizing gay people turn out to be closeted gay people themselves.

Posted
20 minutes ago, Mike Parrish said:

No, I'm saying that some people who spend lots of time demonizing gay people turn out to be closeted gay people themselves.

this is nothing new...

very typical that anyone who is vehement against anything is just fighting off inner demons...

i would not be surprised at all if you get exposed as a closeted republican at some point...

  • Fire 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, LJB said:

this is nothing new...

very typical that anyone who is vehement against anything is just fighting off inner demons...

i would not be surprised at all if you get exposed as a closeted republican at some point...

A conservative friend told me I'm the most conservative liberal he knows...

Posted
1 minute ago, Mike Parrish said:

A conservative friend told me I'm the most conservative liberal he knows...

yep...

just fighting off the GOP...

Posted
38 minutes ago, Mike Parrish said:

No, I'm saying that some people who spend lots of time demonizing gay people turn out to be closeted gay people themselves.

where/when did that guy 'demonize gay people' ? 

  • Confused 1

TBD

Posted
9 hours ago, Husker_Du said:

that side piece was a minor

Actually, in this instance, she was of consenting age. 

Epstein did Gates pretty dirty. Billy boy found the lass on his own without Epstein's assistance. Epstein later finds out about the tryst and pays for the girl's tuition to coding school and then emails Gates to inform him that he needs to reimburse Epstein for the tuition. This was obviously his not-so-subtle way of telling Gates he knew of his misdeeds. This is how Epstein got Gates into his orbit.

Of course that girl had links to connected people in Russia but she wasn't a minor. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...