Republicans Rigging Electronic Ballots?

[wrestlingguy]

14 minutes ago, jross said:

These political campaigns somehow have my mobile number and won’t stop texting and calling. I reply STOP and report them as spam, and a different number starts up. STOP!

Between that and the fraudulent texts about local contractors wanting to chat I have blocked half the US.

[1032004]

27 minutes ago, wrestlingguy said:

Is that the ole rubber and glue argument? You really do show your age often on here.

No, I was just pointing out a factual statement that at least in this election cycle, it is the Republicans that are primarily campaigning on identity politics while Democrats are primarily campaigning on real issues.  Do you disagree?  For the most part, Republicans are trying to stoke fear about Muslims, illegals and transgenders, while Democrats are talking about cost of living and unnecessary wars.  You don’t have to agree with their proposed solutions to those issues, but you should agree those are the real issues.

I’m 40…

[Rassling]

At the end of the day D’s, Trump will still be YOUR president for the next 2 yrs.

[red viking]

1 minute ago, Rassling said:

At the end of the day D’s, Trump will still be YOUR president for the next 2 yrs.

My lame duck pedo Prez. He may be my pedo prez, but he'll get the minimal amount of cooperation from me requiired by law, and I'll vote for anybody that will lock that MFer up and throw away the key. 

No worries, he won't be able to get much done after the new Congress starts anyway. His glory days are just about behind him and now it will be time for him to start paying the price. 

[wrestlingguy]

17 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

No, I was just pointing out a factual statement that at least in this election cycle, it is the Republicans that are primarily campaigning on identity politics while Democrats are primarily campaigning on real issues.  Do you disagree?  For the most part, Republicans are trying to stoke fear about Muslims, illegals and transgenders, while Democrats are talking about cost of living and unnecessary wars.  You don’t have to agree with their proposed solutions to those issues, but you should agree those are the real issues.

I’m 40…

If you are talking about El-Sayed and Talarico, which are the most talked about lately, I wouldn't be a bit shocked if both won. 

[1032004]

2 minutes ago, wrestlingguy said:

If you are talking about El-Sayed and Talarico, which are the most talked about lately, I wouldn't be a bit shocked if both won. 

I mentioned them earlier as the two most notable, but I think they are a bit of a microcosm for the country.  I’m not even talking about whether or not they will win, just about their campaigns vs those of their opponents.  Or are you suggesting that they will win because they are focusing on the real issues?

[Rassling]

22 minutes ago, red viking said:

My lame duck pedo Prez. He may be my pedo prez, but he'll get the minimal amount of cooperation from me requiired by law, and I'll vote for anybody that will lock that MFer up and throw away the key. 

No worries, he won't be able to get much done after the new Congress starts anyway. His glory days are just about behind him and now it will be time for him to start paying the price. 

Ok, so does that mean we get to see a more tempered rv if dems win? 

[jross]

No we will not

[red viking]

5 minutes ago, Rassling said:

Ok, so does that mean we get to see a more tempered rv if dems win? 

I'll become tempered once/if we get a new D prez that dishes out significant vengeance to the wingers. 

[Rassling]

2 minutes ago, red viking said:

I'll become tempered once/if we get a new D prez that dishes out significant vengeance to the wingers. 

you're using a broad bush to paint an entire group for the actions of a few. Are all conservatives “wingers” as you call them? Sounds derogatory to me.  Even some of your friends and colleagues may be C’s. Are they “wingers” too? 

[wrestlingguy]

2 hours ago, Rassling said:

you're using a broad bush to paint an entire group for the actions of a few. Are all conservatives “wingers” as you call them? Sounds derogatory to me.  Even some of your friends and colleagues may be C’s. Are they “wingers” too? 

He has to pretend he lives in a world where conservatives are the most awful thing ever to justify his irrational hate. If you can imagine someone in their 50s that still lives in a world he makes up in his head.

[wrestlingguy]

2 hours ago, 1032004 said:

I mentioned them earlier as the two most notable, but I think they are a bit of a microcosm for the country.  I’m not even talking about whether or not they will win, just about their campaigns vs those of their opponents.  Or are you suggesting that they will win because they are focusing on the real issues?

More like a lot of people at this point would vote against their own interests just to have someone that isn’t associated with the party of Trump. 

[1032004]

25 minutes ago, wrestlingguy said:

More like a lot of people at this point would vote against their own interests just to have someone that isn’t associated with the party of Trump. 

Ok but this doesn’t address my point.  Are you denying that El Sayed and Talarico are focusing primarily on real issues while Rogers and Paxton are focusing primarily on identity politics?  That’s just willful ignorance if so.

Edited October 21 by 1032004

[wrestlingguy]

18 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Ok but this doesn’t address my point.  Are you denying that El Sayed and Talarico are focusing primarily on real issues while Rogers and Paxton are focusing primarily on identity politics?  That’s just willful ignorance if so.

They are all focusing on issues. It depends what issues are important to the voters in MI and TX. The left has made a living on identity politics. There isn’t a minority they haven’t tried to exploit. The only reason Kamala was a candidate was they thought they could get enough idiots to vote for her just because she was a minority and a woman. There were a lot, but not enough. 

[1032004]

41 minutes ago, wrestlingguy said:

They are all focusing on issues. It depends what issues are important to the voters in MI and TX. The left has made a living on identity politics. There isn’t a minority they haven’t tried to exploit. The only reason Kamala was a candidate was they thought they could get enough idiots to vote for her just because she was a minority and a woman. There were a lot, but not enough. 

Well, sure.  “The issues” to MAGA are trying to deport all Muslims and getting rid of the 5 boys in the country that play girl’s sports… 

[Lipdrag]

4 hours ago, Rassling said:

you're using a broad bush to paint an entire group for the actions of a few. Are all conservatives “wingers” as you call them? Sounds derogatory to me.  Even some of your friends and colleagues may be C’s. Are they “wingers” too? 

C'mon, Rasslin', you can't be newly encountering DaVik.  Anyone who disagrees with DaVik is  classified as a radically right wing and therefore a winger in his mind.  People who are very far left but not enough for DaVik are wingers. If you don't hate America enough DaVik labels you a winger.  If you agree with him too subtly he cannot understand it and hurls insults.  

The dude is 110% a farce on here now.

[Doublehalf]

7 hours ago, jross said:

Do not bear false witness.

Thou shalt have no other gods before me.

Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth:

Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me

[Doublehalf]

2 hours ago, wrestlingguy said:

More like a lot of people at this point would vote against their own interests just to have someone that isn’t associated with the party of Trump. 

Funny, great example of that are farmers that voted for Trump...

[Doublehalf]

40 minutes ago, Lipdrag said:

C'mon, Rasslin', you can't be newly encountering DaVik.  Anyone who disagrees with DaVik is  classified as a radically right wing and therefore a winger in his mind.  People who are very far left but not enough for DaVik are wingers. If you don't hate America enough DaVik labels you a winger.  If you agree with him too subtly he cannot understand it and hurls insults.  

The dude is 110% a farce on here now.

Someone has to be on the other side of the coin to @JimmySpeaks @Offthemat @Scouts Honor @El Luchador etc...

Youre lucky there's only one of them vs 10 like there are of those parrots

[1032004]

5 hours ago, Rassling said:

you're using a broad bush to paint an entire group for the actions of a few. Are all conservatives “wingers” as you call them? Sounds derogatory to me.  Even some of your friends and colleagues may be C’s. Are they “wingers” too? 

Have you made this same comment to @Offthemat who constantly says “Dimocrax”?  Which of course is much more derogatory than “wingers.”

[JimmySpeaks]

1 hour ago, Doublehalf said:

 

Thou shalt have no other gods before me.

Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth:

Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me

I’m guessing you’re the fourth generation that’s dumber than your parents. 

[Rassling]

6 hours ago, 1032004 said:

Have you made this same comment to @Offthemat who constantly says “Dimocrax”?  Which of course is much more derogatory than “wingers.”

Haven’t been here long enough to know who’s who. 

[Rassling]

7 hours ago, Lipdrag said:

C'mon, Rasslin', you can't be newly encountering DaVik.  Anyone who disagrees with DaVik is  classified as a radically right wing and therefore a winger in his mind.  People who are very far left but not enough for DaVik are wingers. If you don't hate America enough DaVik labels you a winger.  If you agree with him too subtly he cannot understand it and hurls insults.  

The dude is 110% a farce on here now.

I share his interest in geology so I tried to look for other commonalities even though he’s a D. At first when I began visiting here I thought his stance was half and half (50% genuine / 50% trolling). It appears he really is as angry, hateful and vengeful @ 100% as many of you claim. Not healthy RV.

[Doublehalf]

7 hours ago, JimmySpeaks said:

I’m guessing you’re the fourth generation that’s dumber than your parents. 

Apparently you are not a religious or god fearing man. 

[wrestlingguy]

11 hours ago, 1032004 said:

Well, sure.  “The issues” to MAGA are trying to deport all Muslims and getting rid of the 5 boys in the country that play girl’s sports… 

I don't see those as issues that Mike Rogers or Ken Paxton have spoken about. I don't think you can get a real grasp of what the actual issues they are wanting to address from social media because all the extremists and bots get amplified.