JUST DON'T GO

[red viking]

5 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

Sleepy joe had access to all of it.  Now buy that glacier yourself 

He decided he had more important things to focus on. It's that simple. Plus, there were legal hurdles associated with releasing the files. It's not as simple as it seems in your pea-sized brain. 

Trump is the one that made an issue out of the files and now the good people of this great country demand that the file gets released. Next prez is gonna follow through and expose that MFer, and every other winger groomer that's in that file. There may be some Dems too, but we all know that most of the sickos are on the right. LETS GO. RELEASE ALL OF THE FILE!!

[Caveira]

11 minutes ago, red viking said:

He decided he had more important things to focus on. It's that simple. Plus, there were legal hurdles associated with releasing the files. It's not as simple as it seems in your pea-sized brain. 

Trump is the one that made an issue out of the files and now the good people of this great country demand that the file gets released. Next prez is gonna follow through and expose that MFer, and every other winger groomer that's in that file. There may be some Dems too, but we all know that most of the sickos are on the right. LETS GO. RELEASE ALL OF THE FILE!!

If there was evidence of Trump being a pedo in there.  
 

Can you name the legal hurdle Biden had that prevented bringing charges against Trump.  
 

Now we know they can bring charges against Trump because they did so it can’t be that.  

[red viking]

4 minutes ago, Caveira said:

If there was evidence of Trump being a pedo in there.  
 

Can you name the legal hurdle Biden had that prevented bringing charges against Trump.  
 

Now we know they can bring charges against Trump because they did so it can’t be that.  

You idiot. Do you understand the difference between "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" and "preponderance of the evidence?" 

This has been discussed on here many times. There's not enough in there to lock him up, but DEFINITELY enough to indicate that he probably raped little girls 

Plenty of other reasons to lock that p.o.s. up though. And throw away the key!!! 

Edited August 27 by red viking

[Caveira]

7 minutes ago, red viking said:

You idiot. Do you understand the difference between "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" and "preponderance of the evidence?" 

This has been discussed on here many times. There's not enough in there to lock him up, but DEFINITELY enough to indicate that he probably raped little girls 

Plenty of other reasons to lock that p.o.s. up though. And throw away the key!!! 

If he released sketchy info about Trump being a pedo.   Brought charges etc… or an investigation.  
 

would that have helped or hurt the Ds chances in the last presidential election?

also you don’t realize it but you just admitted there is nothing damning in there about trump

[Scouts Honor]

26 minutes ago, red viking said:

He decided he had more important things to focus on.

lol

 i agree, he had to figure out how to move thousands of illegals around the country 

[Scouts Honor]

11 minutes ago, red viking said:

You idiot. Do you understand the difference between "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" and "preponderance of the evidence?" 

This has been discussed on here many times. There's not enough in there to lock him up, but DEFINITELY enough to indicate that he probably raped little girls 

Plenty of other reasons to lock that p.o.s. up though. And throw away the key!!! 

so they dont have proof.

noted 

[red viking]

5 minutes ago, Caveira said:

If he released sketchy info about Trump being a pedo.   Brought charges etc… or an investigation.  
 

would that have helped or hurt the Ds chances in the last presidential election?

also you don’t realize it but you just admitted there is nothing damning in there about trump

How dumb can you be? I've said about 20 times or more that there's not enough to "prove" that he raped little girls. But we don't need 99% certainty. Just transparency so the people can see what a P.o.s. he is. Right now it's VERY > 50% and will go up with the release of more of the files. 

It's very simple. He campaigned on releasing the files and now him and his supporters do everything they can to prevent it. Let's expose those MFers. He obviously has something to hide that's in those remaining files. Lets do it!!! 

Edited August 27 by red viking

[Caveira]

1 minute ago, red viking said:

How dumb can you be? I've said about 20 times or more that there's not enough to "prove" that he raped little girls. But we don't need 99% certainty. Just transparency so the people can see what a P.o.s. he is. 

It's very simple. He campaigned on releasing the files and now him and his supporters do everything they can to prevent it. Let's expose those MFers. He obviously has something to hide that's in those remaining files. Lets do it!!! 

Would showing a preponderance of evidence he raped little girls helped the Ds win the last election or no?

it would have.   They would have won.   So your saying Biden was to busy to just leak this and cost the Ds and you 4 more years of Trump?

Edited August 27 by Caveira

[Scouts Honor]

1 minute ago, red viking said:

How dumb can you be? I've said about 20 times or more that there's not enough to "prove" that he raped little girls. But we don't need 99% certainty. Just transparency so the people can see what a P.o.s. he is. Right now it's VERY > 50% and will go up with the release of more of the files. 

It's very simple. He campaigned on releasing the files and now him and his supporters do everything they can to prevent it. Let's expose those MFers. He obviously has something to hide that's in those remaining files. Lets do it!!! 

so again

no proof.

[red viking]

Just now, Caveira said:

Would showing a preponderance of evidence he raped little girls helped the Ds win the last election or no?

it would have.   They would have run.   So your saying Biden was to busy to just leak this and cost the Ds and you 4 more years of Trump?

He should have done it. He made plenty of mistakes, besides just being old and slow. Dems haven't been nearly as strategic and cutthroat as Republicans but it's time to change that and go for the throat!!!! 

[red viking]

Just now, Scouts Honor said:

so again

no proof.

You idiot. I've said that MANY Times, from the beginning. Preponderence of the evidence that somebody raped little girls is still pretty bad, except when you're a morally bankrupt P.O.S. like most wingers are. 

[Caveira]

Just now, red viking said:

He should have done it. He made plenty of mistakes, besides just being old and slow. Dems haven't been nearly as strategic and cutthroat as Republicans but it's time to change that and go for the throat!!!! 

So only Biden saw this preponderance of evidence ?   He didn’t show it to the DOJ or FBI to ask if it was enough to charge him?   He didn’t show it to his cabinet?  The Secretary of State?   His wife or his son?   He didn’t leak anything to the press?   Weird.  It’s almost like all the Ds were to busy to prevent 4 more years of Trump.    
 

how are you liking these extra 4 years yall earned because in your words …. They were to lazy or busy doing other things.  

[red viking]

1 minute ago, Caveira said:

So only Biden saw this preponderance of evidence ?   He didn’t show it to the DOJ or FBI to ask if it was enough to charge him?   He didn’t show it to his cabinet?  The Secretary of State?   His wife or his son?   He didn’t leak anything to the press?   Weird.  It’s almost like all the Ds were to busy to prevent 4 more years of Trump.    
 

how are you liking these extra 4 years yall earned because in your words …. They were to lazy or busy doing other things.  

Dems need to go for the throat this time, like the wingers always do. No more being nice. Like I said. Lock all those MFers up!!! 

Edited August 27 by red viking

[Caveira]

3 minutes ago, red viking said:

Dems need to go for the throat this time, like the wingers always do. No more being nice. Like I said. Lock all those MFers up!!! 

You aren’t mad at the dozens and dozens and dozens of Ds who saw this preponderance of evidence and decided to keep quiet about it?  
 

I mean they had time to go censor Facebook and Twitter and stuff.   They didn’t have time to mention the preponderance of kiddie rape in the docs ?    To the man who they literally think is the worst man ever to run the country.    
 

to prevent the second coming of Hitler.  And the whole Trump was king for a day and all of this.  
 

your not mad at them for this?

[red viking]

5 minutes ago, Caveira said:

You aren’t mad at the dozens and dozens and dozens of Ds who saw this preponderance of evidence and decided to keep quiet about it?  
 

I mean they had time to go censor Facebook and Twitter and stuff.   They didn’t have time to mention the preponderance of kiddie rape in the docs ?    To the man who they literally think is the worst man ever to run the country.    
 

to prevent the second coming of Hitler.  And the whole Trump was king for a day and all of this.  
 

your not mad at them for this?

"dozens and dozens and dozens?" Who? 

Obviously, based on what's been released thus far, it would have hurt Trump. We've seen how bad it is for him, and that's only whats already been released. 

[Caveira]

3 minutes ago, red viking said:

"dozens and dozens and dozens?" Who? 

Obviously, based on what's been released thus far, it would have hurt Trump. We've seen how bad it is for him, and that's only whats already been released. 

He has to consult his cabinet the doj the fbi and others to see if the evidence was good enough to charge.   All of them kept their lips shut ….   Some of them just spent their time censoring Twitter instead.  
 

during Biden’s presidency (2021–2025), and suppose the FBI uncovered genuinely damning evidence that Trump had raped someone, the normal chain would not be “Biden personally decides whether there’s enough evidence to charge Trump.”

It would generally look like this:

1. FBI agents/investigators would investigate the allegation and gather evidence.
2. The case would be presented to federal prosecutors at the appropriate U.S. Attorney’s Office or DOJ.
3. Career federal prosecutors would evaluate whether the evidence supported charges.
4. If it were a federal felony requiring an indictment, prosecutors could present the evidence to a grand jury, which decides whether there is probable cause to indict. 
5. The Attorney General, who during Biden's presidency was Merrick Garland, was the head of DOJ, but he would not ordinarily personally make the evidentiary determination in an individual rape case.

[red viking]

1 minute ago, Caveira said:

He has to consult his cabinet the doj the fbi and others to see if the evidence was good enough to charge.   All of them kept their lips shut ….   Some of them just spent their time censoring Twitter instead.  
 

 

during Biden’s presidency (2021–2025), and suppose the FBI uncovered genuinely damning evidence that Trump had raped someone, the normal chain would not be “Biden personally decides whether there’s enough evidence to charge Trump.”

It would generally look like this:

1. FBI agents/investigators would investigate the allegation and gather evidence.
2. The case would be presented to federal prosecutors at the appropriate U.S. Attorney’s Office or DOJ.
3. Career federal prosecutors would evaluate whether the evidence supported charges.
4. If it were a federal felony requiring an indictment, prosecutors could present the evidence to a grand jury, which decides whether there is probable cause to indict. 
5. The Attorney General, who during Biden's presidency was Merrick Garland, was the head of DOJ, but he would not ordinarily personally make the evidentiary determination in an individual rape case.

And those were ALL Democrats, you idiot? 

Either way, as I've also said for the 10th time or so now, YES they should have exposed that MFer. We've seen the evidence, or at least some of it, and how bad it makes that pedo look. 

Edited August 27 by red viking

[Caveira]

17 minutes ago, red viking said:

And those were ALL Democrats, you idiot? 

Either way, as I've also said for the 10th time or so now, YES they should have exposed that MFer. We've seen the evidence, or at least some of it, and how bad it makes that pedo look. 

What evidence have we seen?

[red viking]

8 minutes ago, Caveira said:

What evidence have we seen?

Again, its been provided here ad nauseum. NOt gonna keep re-posting the same stuff, as the list is VERY long. 

[Caveira]

17 minutes ago, red viking said:

Again, its been provided here ad nauseum. NOt gonna keep re-posting the same stuff, as the list is VERY long. 

I don’t think any was provided.   

[wrestlingguy]

1 hour ago, red viking said:

"dozens and dozens and dozens?" Who? 

Obviously, based on what's been released thus far, it would have hurt Trump. We've seen how bad it is for him, and that's only whats already been released. 

So bad that he's still President? Are you saying you have seen things that the DOJ hasn't?

When they release the full files and he still isn't implicated in anything criminal will you please start a thread on here apologizing for constantly calling him a pedo?

Just because you want to believe something really bad because it justifies your abnormal rage, doesn't mean it's true.

[red viking]

4 minutes ago, wrestlingguy said:

So bad that he's still President? Are you saying you have seen things that the DOJ hasn't?

When they release the full files and he still isn't implicated in anything criminal will you please start a thread on here apologizing for constantly calling him a pedo?

Just because you want to believe something really bad because it justifies your abnormal rage, doesn't mean it's true.

So bad that he basically has the lowest approval rating in history. Winger majority in Congress/Senate is what's keeping that P.O.S. in office. 

Yes, he's a 34-time felon and would have had many more convictions had the election not saved him. 

Yes, he's 110% a pedo. 

Edited August 27 by red viking

[red viking]

11 minutes ago, wrestlingguy said:

So bad that he's still President? Are you saying you have seen things that the DOJ hasn't?

When they release the full files and he still isn't implicated in anything criminal will you please start a thread on here apologizing for constantly calling him a pedo?

Just because you want to believe something really bad because it justifies your abnormal rage, doesn't mean it's true.

Do you understand the difference between preponderance of the evidence and "beyond a reasonable doubt." He's a pedo per the preponderance of the evidence. 

[Scouts Honor]

2 hours ago, red viking said:

Dems need to go for the throat this time, like the wingers always do. No more being nice. Like I said. Lock all those MFers up!!! 

lol

thats what they did last time.

and it was all undone.

rightfully so.

feelings dont make facts.

[Scouts Honor]

1 hour ago, red viking said:

Again, its been provided here ad nauseum. NOt gonna keep re-posting the same stuff, as the list is VERY long. 

wait you showed evidence trump is in the epstein files?