Hassan Piker. What a nut job. I just heard some of his radical extreme comments. Wow.

[El Luchador]

 

 

 

[El Luchador]

 

 

 

[El Luchador]

 

 

 

 

[Doublehalf]

38 minutes ago, El Luchador said:

I'm familiar with most of those, and the context is everything. You are intellectually dishonest. 

You are just dishonest.

[JimmySpeaks]

11 hours ago, Caveira said:

Show me that gas price meme again that was so far off from reality it’s more Snow White than real 

Ya that meme was priceless. Showed what Double Dribble is all about. 

[JimmySpeaks]

1 hour ago, Doublehalf said:

You are just dishonest.

Coming from you bahahahahahhaah. Go post another gas meme. 

Edited September 4 by JimmySpeaks

[Offthemat]

13 hours ago, Doublehalf said:

"It's worth it to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year, so that we can have the Second Amendment" - Don't know why everyone lost their minds after his death if he himself said it's totally worth it...

He’s not saying that it’s okay to shoot people because we have the right to bear arms.  He’s saying that you can expect some unfortunate deaths due to misuse and accidents.  Just like we do for automobiles.  Some automobile deaths are accidental and some are from misuse.  He was emphatically in favor of teaching that the misuse of firearms, and automobiles, was wrong and that it should be aggressively policed and prosecuted.  He didn’t say it was okay, he said it could be expected.  That is where you, and not @El Luchador is being dishonest.

Edited September 4 by Offthemat

[Doublehalf]

Just now, Offthemat said:

He’s not saying that it’s okay to shoot people because we have the right to bear arms.  He’s saying that you can expect that some unfortunate deaths due to misuse and accidents.  Just like we do for automobiles.  Some automobile deaths are accidental and some are from misuse.  He was emphatically in favor of teaching that the misuse of firearms, and automobiles, was wrong and that it should be aggressively policed and prosecuted.  He didn’t say it was okay, he said it could be expected.  That is where you, and not @El Luchador is being dishonest.

A gun death is a gun death- he did not specify which. You can try to glaze over and re-contextualize all you want. I quoted what he said, you're giving your opinion which is only that, an opinion. 

[JimmySpeaks]

7 minutes ago, Doublehalf said:

A gun death is a gun death- he did not specify which. You can try to glaze over and re-contextualize all you want. I quoted what he said, you're giving your opinion which is only that, an opinion. 

Now give the facts on where most of our gun deaths come from.  Then do it with illegal guns vs legal guns. You just might learn something. 

Edited September 4 by JimmySpeaks

[Offthemat]

1 minute ago, Doublehalf said:

A gun death is a gun death- he did not specify which. You can try to glaze over and re-contextualize all you want. I quoted what he said, you're giving your opinion which is only that, an opinion. 

You don’t know what you’re talking about, Charlie made the gun and automobile comparison, himself.  It’s not my opinion, it’s Charlie’s words, but you didn’t listen to Charlie, so you don’t know what he said.  You don’t know what he meant when you read snippets of what he said.  You’re ignorant, making ignorant comments, and defending them in front of everybody.  Loser. 

[Doublehalf]

1 minute ago, Offthemat said:

You don’t know what you’re talking about, Charlie made the gun and automobile comparison, himself.  It’s not my opinion, it’s Charlie’s words, but you didn’t listen to Charlie, so you don’t know what he said.  You don’t know what he meant when you read snippets of what he said.  You’re ignorant, making ignorant comments, and defending them in front of everybody.  Loser. 

Were you his secret lover or something? He said what he said and you're trying to rationalize it in a way that makes you feel better. 
 

he said gun deaths were worth it and he just happened to become one of the statistics he spoke of. 

[Bigbrog]

16 minutes ago, Doublehalf said:

Were you his secret lover or something? He said what he said and you're trying to rationalize it in a way that makes you feel better. 
 

he said gun deaths were worth it and he just happened to become one of the statistics he spoke of. 

You are being so intellectually dishonest it's funny. Not to mention extremely immature and uninformed 

[Doublehalf]

4 minutes ago, Bigbrog said:

You are being so intellectually dishonest it's funny. Not to mention extremely immature and uninformed 

Do you guys all get the same talking points every morning??

As Charlie would say - Prove me wrong

Edited September 4 by Doublehalf

[Bigbrog]

4 minutes ago, Doublehalf said:

Do you guys all get the same talking points every morning??

As Charlie would say - Prove me wrong

What does this even mean?  

Prove you wrong about Charlie is pretty easy as you clearly haven't listened to the full conversations of his for the quotes you so conveniently choose only the pertinent words you wanted to to try and make him look bad for some weird reason. I didn't agree with everything Charlie believed but overall what he did and his overall message and intent, was extremely admirable. I just don't understand the hate towards him. And another thing, your very weak attempt at trying to compare him to anyone on the left is hilarious...there are zero people on the left doing what he did and in the way he did it.  

[JimmySpeaks]

13 minutes ago, Doublehalf said:

Do you guys all get the same talking points every morning??

As Charlie would say - Prove me wrong

Gun deaths only matter to people like you when they’re outside the inner city.  If the left truly cared about gun violence they’d start there.  

[Doublehalf]

6 minutes ago, Bigbrog said:

What does this even mean?  

Prove you wrong about Charlie is pretty easy as you clearly haven't listened to the full conversations of his for the quotes you so conveniently choose only the pertinent words you wanted to to try and make him look bad for some weird reason. I didn't agree with everything Charlie believed but overall what he did and his overall message and intent, was extremely admirable. I just don't understand the hate towards him. And another thing, your very weak attempt at trying to compare him to anyone on the left is hilarious...there are zero people on the left doing what he did and in the way he did it.  

Just because MAGA was infatuated by him doesn't mean everyone else has to be. He had an agenda and wasn't debating people out of the kindness of his heart. He grifted like all these other guys do, he just had an audience far more gullible. 
 

He said offensive shit constantly. Maybe you want women to be chained to their house with their only purpose to support a husband- many don't. 
 

Get over yourselves and this revisionist history of Charlie Kirk. You act like he should be a saint. 

Edited September 4 by Doublehalf

[Doublehalf]

2 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

Gun deaths only matter to people like you when they’re outside the inner city.  If the left truly cared about gun violence they’d start there.  

I don't entirely disagree, but by tackling background checks and strict registration, it will help both inside and outside of the inner city. 

[Caveira]

7 minutes ago, Doublehalf said:

I don't entirely disagree, but by tackling background checks and strict registration, it will help both inside and outside of the inner city. 

Maybe police your inner cities.   Democrats give zero shits about black on black crime.   Won’t even prosecute attempted murders sometimes. 
 

 

 

[Doublehalf]

2 minutes ago, Caveira said:

Maybe police your inner cities.   Democrats give zero shits about black on black crime.   Won’t even prosecute attempted murders sometimes. 
 

 

After that random website you sent that didn't prove anything, I don't trust a single thing you send. You are literally the poster boy of fake news on this message board haha.

Edited September 4 by Doublehalf

[JimmySpeaks]

16 minutes ago, Doublehalf said:

Just because MAGA was infatuated by him doesn't mean everyone else has to be. He had an agenda and wasn't debating people out of the kindness of his heart. He grifted like all these other guys do, he just had an audience far more gullible. 
 

He said offensive shit constantly. Maybe you want women to be chained to their house with their only purpose to support a husband- many don't. 
 

Get over yourselves and this revisionist history of Charlie Kirk. You act like he should be a saint. 

But you said piker wasn’t a grifter. Now he is?   Pick a side. 

[JimmySpeaks]

4 minutes ago, Doublehalf said:

After that random website you sent that didn't prove anything, I don't trust a single thing you send. You are literally the poster boy of fake news on this message board haha.

Ya your gas meme was spot on. We all trust what you post because of it.

[JimmySpeaks]

17 minutes ago, Doublehalf said:

I don't entirely disagree, but by tackling background checks and strict registration, it will help both inside and outside of the inner city. 

Where are these no background check and strict registration free zones you speak of?  I’ve purchased guns in two different states.  One red, one blue.  I received a background check in both. The red state even took longer.  And believe me it took more than five minutes to register. 

[Doublehalf]

10 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

But you said piker wasn’t a grifter. Now he is?   Pick a side. 

I never said he wasn't a grifter- if you read more carefully I said "minus the levels of grifting" 

- there are certainly levels to how much one grifts, Charlie was far ahead of where Piker is.

Edited September 4 by Doublehalf

[JimmySpeaks]

5 minutes ago, Doublehalf said:

I never said he wasn't a grifter- if you read more carefully I said "minis the levels of grifting" 

- there are certainly levels to how much one grifts, Charlie was far ahead of where Piker is.

So you never said piker is Charlie Kirk without the grifting???  Nice job on the edit.  

Edited September 4 by JimmySpeaks

[Scouts Honor]

15 hours ago, Doublehalf said:

 

 

"It's worth it to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year, so that we can have the Second Amendment" - Don't know why everyone lost their minds after his death if he himself said it's totally worth it...

 

 

 

 

did any of those quotes say blood in the streets? kill them mfers?

no. so i got rid of those parts of your post

but as to the quote i left up:

tell me you don't understand the founders, without telling me