All Activity

Explain this.

They do have a say in the country. Voting blocks don't follow state size. It's not 1790. Texas and California don't vote together because they're big. Wyoming and Rhode Island don't vote together because they're small. The House *actually* accomplishes what you think the Senate is supposed to accomplish. Rural districts elect candidates to represent them. Urban districts represent candidates to represent them. There are Republican House members from the most liberal states in the country and Democrat House members from the most conservative, each elected to represent their local constituencies.

yes, you are right. i should pay more attention to what the people who want to destroy us are thinking. based on your last post... let me guess, most of the policies are far left that have merit

OK still but has PSU really been weak at Heavyweight since Cael took over? Honest question. Weak compared to the PSU standard I guess.

What is really wild about the Wyomung situation is that the wrestler's inability to make weight did not impact him significantly ( he is still an AA) but it did impact the team (they lost 10 points). It seems like you would want the opposite impact.

People can move if they care that much about the electoral college, they can't change their ethnicity. (Unless you're Zohan or Liz Warren)

Well I’m off to the homeless shelter to help out. See you guys later this afternoon.

For those of us that worked for companies that have used it know for a fact that it’s mainly about diversity in the organization. A certain number must be hired and moved thru the system. It’s a fact.

I like the popular vote because I believe in 1 man - 1 vote. That's the spirit of elections. Everybody is equal, regardless of race, gender, or creed.

But you don’t need states if they don’t have ANY equal say in what happens in the country. You’re for open borders for the nation why keep them for the states?? Not necessary but can be useful if used correctly. You can say it’s not a quota but it is. It needs to be done organically

Ribbit.

@Interviewed_at_Weehawken good example of someone who actually just "copies and pastes" in the sense you accused me of. @JimmySpeaks believes these things because that's he was told to believe. He doesn't know why he believes them. He's never thought them through logically. That's why it's so easy to back him into a corner where he has to admit DEI is good and necessary because he can't abandon the belief that the Senate is absolutely necessary.

Every voter should be equal. People that live in less populated states have orders of magnitude more representation. It's bs and a,slap in the face to democratic principles.

The idiot wingers think that DEi is all about going out of your way to hire minorities. That's not what it typically is.

The left likes the popular vote because statistically they win it more. I also believe that’s core to the let all illegals in and let those here illegally become citizens strategy as well - as they should win a higher % of that vote as well. It’s just a numbers game.

No, states can still legislate local issues like they already do. The Senate is part of the federal government. The legislative branch should be concerned with governing the country, based on the total population, not artificially drawn lines on a map. Okay, so what do checks and balances for DEI look like in corporate America? You concede that some DEI is necessary?

I would be concerned about being late for Thanksgiving Dinner.

Are you advocating we get rid of states?

Wrong. The house and senate balance each other. The other two balance them. Other wise why have any states at all ????? Wow.

DEI needs checks and balances or it will never work. Which is what corporate America just found out.

He’s affirming a system of checks and balance of which both the house and senate are a part of. Neither works the way it does without the other. Wow.

The House is already checked and balanced by the Executive and Judiciary. Checks and balances would still exist without the Senate.

Great! Now that we've established that DEI is not inherently bad, you can address the hole in Charlie's argument. Answer this question: Why is DEI good in the case of the Senate and bad in the case of Affirmative Action?

I support checks and balances which is what the house and senate are set up for.

*interim champ Parris was going to take his RS in 2023 if Gable wrestled.